Mercy v. Justice – Old Testament v. New Testament While the conflict between justice and mercy plays a key role in determining the outcome of The Merchant of Venice, this conflict is even more important because it provides a setting for the contrast between the rigid law and rules of the Old Testament and the concepts of mercy and forgiveness as taught by Christ in the New Testament. It is in the climactic trial scene that The Duke, hoping Shylock will excuse Antonio’s penalty, asks him, “How shall thou hope for mercy rend ” ring none?” He is referring to expectations of judgment in the afterlife.
However, so is Shylock, when he counters, “What judgment shall I dread doing no wrong?” This exchange perfectly presents this conflict between of the Old Testament and the New, in which the former is seen to emphasize strict obedience as mankind’s obligation to God while the latter stresses God’s grace and mercy. The laws and rules of the Old Testament insisted on strict justice, “An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth” (Exodus 21: 23, 24; also see: Leviticus 24: 19, 20; and Deuteronomy 19: 21) while the New Testament calls for mercy, “Blessed are the merciful: for they shall obtain mercy” (Matthew 5: 7) said Christ in the Sermon on the Mount. He later added “Ye have heard that it hath been said, ‘An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth’; but I say unto you, that ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.” (Matthew 5: 39).
The Essay on Justice vs mercy
In the case of Rukyo, he had two major ethical dilemmas that he was forced to face in his lifetime. The first was when he came into contact with the man that caused the burning of his home planet. He was fighting with the Leruican Army when he recognized the face of one of his opponents. Rukyo knew that he was a skilled fighter and could defeat and kill this man easily in combat but he also knew ...
Shakespeare’s version of “An eye for and eye” is found at the end of Shylock’s great speech in the trial scene of Act IV, “If a Jew wrong a Christian, what is his humility? Revenge. If a Christian wrong a Jew, what should his sufferance be by Christian example? Why, revenge.
The villainy you teach me I will execute, and it shall go hard but I will better the instruction.” His demand for vengeance is made more understandable in this famous speech as he lays open the years of pain and anger caused by the anti-Semitic treatment and abuse from the likes of Antonio and the rest of Venetian society. But, while he is more a victim than a villain, he’s not blameless. What turns Shylock into a ruthless avenger is his daughter’s elopement with a Christian and her rejection of the religion of her family. It is this betrayal by his own flesh and blood that renders Shylock seemingly merciless towards Antonio. At first, the others do not take Shylock seriously; they cannot believe that he will go through with his threat.
Shylock, for his part, has indeed become fierce in his desire to extract vengeance by forcing the death of Antonio. The trial scene is constructed from a Christian perspective, and it highlights the dichotomy of Old Testament legalism as opposed to the New Testament gospel of grace and forgiveness. The Duke, Bassanio and finally Portia, all plead with Shylock to show mercy, but Shylock’s hate has made him immune to reason, as he is totally absorbed by a passion for revenge. The Merchant of Venice draws upon laws and rules of Venice and those stipulated in contracts and wills. Two things are emphasized when the trial begins.
Firstly, it is clear that Shylock will not show any mercy and relinquish his right to a pound of Antonio’s flesh as stipulated in the bond, and secondly, that Shylock has the rule of law on his side. Antonio himself says, “The Duke cannot deny the course of law: For the commodities that strangers have / With us in Venice, if it be denied, Will much impeach the justice of the State, Since that the trade and profit of the city / Consist eth of all Nations.” Shylock demands the strict interpretation of those laws, and seeks justice in its most severe and un compromised form. He demands Antonio’s death for forfeiting his bond. ‘The pound of flesh which I demand of him / Is dearly bought, ’tis mine and I will have it’.
The Essay on Venetian Society Shylock Mercy Christian
True Christian Kindenss The word kind can be defined as sympathetic and generous or natural, following one s nature. The term mercy combines these ideas into a fitting idea in the play. Mercy can be defined as kind and considerate treatment that you show someone, especially when you forgive them or do not punish them. The idea of mercy in the Merchant of Venice is used to develop the ideas of ...
In response to Shylock’s Old Testament cry for bloody justice Portia answers with a speech that rivals Shylock’s in power and effect. Having just delivered one of the most moving speeches in any of Shakespeare’s plays, Shylock is nonetheless oblivious to Portia’s “quality of mercy” speech. “The quality of mercy is not strained. It as the gentle rain from heaven upon the place beneath / It is enthroned in the hearts of kings; It is an attribute to God himself, And earthly power doth then show likest God’s / When mercy seasons justice. Therefore, Jew, Though justice be thy plea, consider this: That in the course of justice none of us should see salvation. We do pray for mercy, And that same prayer doth teach us all to render the deeds of mercy.” The prayer Portia refers to is “The Lord’s Prayer”, specifically the words, ” Forgive us our trespasses as we forgive those who trespass against us.” Although eloquent and moving, Portia’s speech ignores the conflict between mercy and justice as a polarizing issue between the Old and New Testaments.
Her frequent references to God are clearly references to a Christian God, and mercy emerges as a quality of that God. It is not Shylock’s God. There is no understanding between the two. Shylock’s reply is simply, “My deeds upon my head! I crave the law.’ His God does not require him to deliver mercy, just obedience to the laws and rules of the Old Testament. Shylock is defeated by Portia’s clever manipulation of the law, holding that while he is entitled to his pound of flesh, not one drop of Antonio’s blood may be spilled in getting it.
Furthermore, his demand to what is legally his has left him in violation of another Venetian law. Portia tells Shylock that for threatening the life of Antonio, his goods are forfeited ‘And the offender’s life lies in the mercy / Of the Duke only… .’ Now that it is Shylock who is in need of the mercy of the court the line between mercy and revenge becomes blurred. Portia, after so eloquently extolling the virtue of mercy seems promptly to forget her own speech when it comes to her exercising of mercy. Once Portia turns the tables, The Duke, Bassanio, and Antonio are all willing to allow a defeated Shylock to walk away with his life and half his money.
The Essay on Antonio Shylock Agreement Portia
The Concepts of Peace and Justice in Shakespeares Merchant of Venice If you want peace, work for justice. Unknown In Shakespeares Merchant of Venice, Portia defense of Antonio is considered a wonderful, noble deed. She is not considered the villain (that distinction falls to Shylock), but her deed, which is considered right, proper, and good by her fellow Venetians, is actually more reflective of ...
It is Portia who demands that he be held to the strictest letter of the law, just as he had earlier himself insisted. Portia eloquently espouses the universal need for the grace of forgiveness but then fails to be gracious and forgiving herself. One of the great ironies of this play happens when Shylock calls Portia, ‘A Daniel come to judgment, yea, a Daniel!’ Daniel was the Old Testament judge of Susanna, a woman accused of being unchaste by the elders. The story is pointed because Daniel rules in Susanna’s favor, thus rescuing her from her fate. After freeing her, he then in turn convicts the elders.
Shylock’s mistake is that while he is right in calling Portia a Daniel, he fails to recognize that he is the one who represents the elders and Antonio is the rescued Susanna. In the end, Shylock is prevented from cutting a pound of Antonio’s flesh from very near the merchant’s heart, but in a sense it is the Christians who cut Shylock’s heart out of his body without shedding a drop of his blood. While the Christians preach mercy when Antonio is at risk, the Christian court is happy to opt for Old Testament vengeance itself in exacting a punishment which leaves Shylock feeling that he might as well be dead — “Nay, take my life and all, pardon not that, You take my house, when you do take the prop / That doth sustain my house: you take my life / When you do take the means whereby I live.”.
