Introduction:
An accurate understanding of the economics of the computer and Internet industry is a crucial foundation for following the logic of the Microsoft Anti Trust Case. Microsoft’s attempts to avoid competition by suppressing new technologies were based on the particular way in which competition works in the computer industry. The harm to consumers and society flows from the consumers’ choice lost as a result of the suppression.
With powerful forces for both competition and monopoly in place, it is no surprise that many observers are drawn to one of the two false extreme positions. Some think that the industry is already at perfect competition that even a product at the center of network effects like windows would be quickly replaced if a superior alternative come along. Others think that the user’s and the developer’s sunk cost and network effects surrounding windows are so strong that it could not be displaced. The truth lies somewhere in between. Network effects do indeed allow monopolies like windows to have high entry barriers, but these barriers can fall under the right circumstances such as when specialized firms advance key, complementary technologies, used by the same applications, disruptive technical and market change. This creates a powerful incentive for incumbent monopolists to block focus, which might lower entry barriers.
The relationship between positive economics and the antitrust is direct. If either extreme position had been true, the basis for antitrust case would have vanished. If windows were not a monopoly, Microsoft’s efforts to suppress innovation by other firms could not have harmed competition, since operating system competition would not have existed either way. As in any monopolization case, the government needed to show that there was a monopoly but that it could have ended, was it not for abuse of monopoly power via anticompetitive actions. The government met this burden in Microsoft’s case by showing that widespread distribution of internet-based technologies outside Microsoft’s control such as Netscape’s browser or Sun’s Java, would have established Divided Technical Leadership and thereby lowered the entry barrier were it not for Microsoft’s anticompetitive behavior.
The Essay on Microsoft A Monopoly
The potential breakup of the Microsoft Corporation is presently one of the most consuming issues in our society. The government has declared Microsoft a monopoly, and could possibly be broken up into three pieces. This has come as a shock to most everyone, because Microsoft Windows is usually the first thing that pops up on almost everyones computer when you first turn it on. The government says ...
Microsoft is a very effective marketer of software, and the antitrust case is overwhelmingly about marketing practices. Any new technology in the computer business needs the collaboration of dozens if not hundreds of third party complements. Microsoft sought, by bullying where they had the bargaining power and by bribes where they did not, to prevent third parties from collaborating with the independent browser and cross platform Java. This undercut effective distribution of those technologies and inhibited their use by developers and their end users. The point of all this was to prevent divided technical leadership and the resulting lowering of windows entry barriers. Microsoft’s pattern of anticompetitive acts, which went beyond the browser and Java to a number of other technologies, reveals a consistent and ongoing effort by the firm to block widespread distribution of technologies it finds competitively threatening.
This is a vertical foreclosure case in two ways. Microsoft sought to avoid divided technical leadership because it thought that widely distributed Internet-based technologies outside its own control, while complementary to windows, would lower entry barriers into the windows monopoly. Second, Microsoft sought to block third parties from acting as complementary collaborators with the innovative technologies. In many industries, either the anticompetitive acts would be ineffective because vertical relationships between producers of complements are not so important. In the computer business, the mechanism and the goals of vertical anticompetitive behavior follow directly from the way the industry works.
The Essay on Computing Industry Computers Computer Time
Computer Technology and the Effects on S Computer Technology and the Effect on Society Computer technology has had a great effect on society as a whole throughout history. It has modified our behavior greatly as we have become accustomed to the technological advancements of yesterday. We are so dependent sometimes we do not even have a concept of what life would be like without computers. When we ...
Since we have the constraint of space, I will limit my paper to identifying how competition in the computer industry works, explain how Microsoft sought to suppress that competition and finally, examine the impacts of these acts on competition and consumers in the computer and Internet industry. I will limit my analysis to the outline of the story; thorough analysis of legal and economic evidence is left to other papers.
