Aristotle and Sarte bath have two different views on ownership. Aristotle’s view of ownership is tangible, to own something does not always mean to have a physical object, like a book. However, Sarte’s view of ownership is intangible, to own an inedible object, such as a theory of idea. Ownership is both tangible and intangible. Sarte’s view of ownership appeals to ethics, a branch of knowledge that deals with morals and principles. Since Sarte’s perspective of ownership is intangible, and to own something does not necessarily mean to physically own something, but to realize something as apart of us, like a thought.
Sarte appeals to ethics, because he thinks that we can own something with or through our minds. Aristotle’s view is tangible: he believes that an object has to be physical if it is going to be owned. An example would be reading a biography- I am reading someone’s life, but I do not have the credit for writing the book, because it would be inhumane to take credit of someone’s work. But I own it, because I remember the story, in my thoughts. However, I do not own the initial meaning of ownership, but I own my opinion of ownership.
We own the things we know, because we comprehend them, which turns to ownership. The line between sense of self and ownership is very fine; fine as string, ownership and sense of self become one at a point in life. I own every characteristics of myself, I own up to all my beliefs, and I flaunt them. I own my Christianity?? yes, others believe in Christianity, but I interpret it in different ways, therefore, the ownership is different. Christianity goes back into the beginning of history, many ways of life have been traced back to Christianity.
The Essay on The Different Views Of The Buddha And The Mahavira On Reaching Nirvana
The Mahavira and the Buddha share the same fundamental beliefs in Karma and dharma, however, their philosophies on how to achieve Nirvana differ greatly. Self denial, meditation, and enlightenment are the three major ways these two individuals believed helped to reach Nirvana. The Mahavira believed that self denial and meditation were the ways to achieving Nirvana, when the Buddha believed that ...
Owning my beliefs is just as equal as owning a physical object. I own my mind, I control what goes on around me, as everyone else too; the mind is the same as owning one self, which ties into sense of self, owning all the flaws and characteristics of ourselves. My impression is to own what I know, and flaunt it! When I own my knowledge, and sense of self it gives me a feeling of happiness. I question many things in life, yet, I’ve never questioned ownership, because it seemed unimportant.
However, ownership is an important aspect in life, it gives me leadership and privilege of knowing different situations, When I look at ownership, I combine it with my sense of self, because everything I question has to do with me. When questioning ownership, I question all of my memories, which link back to myself. I am the owner of my memories, because they happened to me, and I choose to keep them. The memories I have chosen to keep give me things to look back on when I get confused or lost; they can lead me to my next journey. I own myself and my thoughts.
