Among other safeguards, I would add that a crowd should never be allowed to frame its own questions, and its answers should never be more complicated than a single number or multiple choice answer. More recently, Nassim Nicholas Taleb has argued that applications of statistics, such as crowd wisdom schemes, should be divided into four quadrants. He defines the dangerous “Fourth Quadrant” as comprising problems that have both complex outcomes and unknown distributions of outcomes. He suggests making that quadrant taboo for crowds. Maybe if you combined all our approaches you? get a practical set of rules for avoiding crowd failures. Then again, maybe we are all on the wrong track. The problem is that there? s been inadequate focus on the testing of such ideas. There? s an odd lack of curiosity about the limits of crowd wisdom. This is an indication of the faith-based motivations behind such schemes. Numerous projects have looked at how to improve specific markets and other crowd wisdom systems, but too few projects have framed the question in more general terms or tested general hypotheses about how crowd systems work.
Trolls “Troll” is a term for an anonymous person who is abusive in an online environment. It would be nice to believe that there is a only a minute troll population living among us. But in fact, a great many people have experienced being drawn into nasty exchanges online. Everyone who has experienced that has been introduced to his or her inner troll. I have tried to learn to be aware of the troll within myself. I notice that I can suddenly become relieved when someone else in an online exchange is getting pounded or humiliated, because that means I? m safe for the moment. If someone else? video is being ridiculed on YouTube, then mine is temporarily protected. But that also means I? m complicit in a mob dynamic. Have I ever planted a seed of mob-beckoning ridicule in order to guide the mob to a target other than myself? Yes, I have, though I shouldn? t have. I observe others doing that very thing routinely in anonymous online meeting places. I? ve also found that I can be drawn into ridiculous pissing matches online in ways that just wouldn? t happen otherwise, and I? ve never noticed any benefit. There is never a lesson learned, or a catharsis of victory or defeat.
The Term Paper on Love Online
THE BIRTH OF A NEW SOCIETY It is not often that one gets to witness the birth of a new society. Yet, the birth of a new society is exactly what is happening on the Internet today. The society is growing quickly. Numbering 40 million people in 1996, it reached 375 million in 2000. It grew to more than 700 million in 2005. In 2005, only China and India were bigger than the society of the Internet. ...
If you win anonymously, no one knows, and if you lose, you just change your pseudonym and start over, without having modified your point of view one bit. If the troll is anonymous and the target is known, then the dynamic is even worse than an encounter between anonymous fragmentary pseudo-people. That? s when the hive turns against personhood. For instance, in 2007 a series of “Scarlet Letter” postings in China incited online throngs to hunt down accused adulterers. In 2008, the focus shifted to Tibet sympathizers. Korea has one of the most intense online cultures in the world, so it has also suffered some of the most extreme trolling.
Korean movie star Choi Jin-sil, sometimes described as the “Nation? s Actress,” committed suicide in 2008 after being hounded online by trolls, but she was only the most famous of a series of similar suicides. In the United States, anonymous internet users have ganged up on targets like Lori Drew, the woman who created a fake boy persona on the internet in order to break the heart of a classmate of her daughter? s, which caused the girl to commit suicide. But more often the targets are chosen randomly, following the pattern described in the short story “The Lottery” by Shirley Jackson.
In the story, residents of a placid small town draw lots to decide which individual will be stoned to death each year. It is as if a measure of human cruelty must be released, and to do so in a contained yet random way limits the damage by using the fairest possible method. Some of the better-known random victims of troll mobs include the blogger Kathy Sierra. She was suddenly targeted in a multitude of ways, such as having images of her as a sexually mutilated corpse posted prominently, apparently in the hopes that her children would see them.
The Research paper on Web based applications for an online dictionary
We are rapidly constructing a broad network infrastructure for moving information across national boundaries through internet, but there is much to be done before linguistic barriers can be surmounted as effectively with cross language translation web based online dictionary. Users seeking information from a digital library could benefit from the ability to query large collections once with a ...
There was no discernible reason Sierra was targeted. Her number was somehow drawn from the lot. Another famous example is the tormenting of the parents of Mitchell Henderson, a boy who committed suicide. They were subjected to gruesome audio-video creations and other tools at the disposal of virtual sadists. Another occurence is the targeting of epileptic people with flashing web designs in the hope of inducing seizures. There is a vast online flood of videos of humiliating assaults on helpless victims. The culture of sadism online has its own vocabulary and has gone mainstream.
