Is morality Relative to culture? This argument’s foundation is the basic question on whether morality is relative to culture, or owns own desires. The pros of this argument are that we get to establish whether or not morality is a true sense of justice. As Melville J. Herskovitz indicates who is in favor of the cultural relativism notion, “Morality is a diverse unique variation of codes and ethics threat arises from culture to culture, belief to belief.” He argues that we cannot judge society based on its laws, and that we have to right to declare them inhumane. The pro’s of his argument supporting cultural relativism are that we as a superior society in the United States need to respect the laws and traditions as what is deemed acceptable in other third world nations. After all he eluded, it was by force that Europeans imposed themselves upon African cultures.
This serves as the basis for his argument. That we are in no right to judge simply because we live a different lifestyle and fear change. His opposition, Louis P. Pojman makes a great counter attack. He agrees with Herskovitz in that social morality does indeed differ from culture to culture, but that does not make them necessarily right. He continues his argument by accentuating that if conventional relativism is accepted, then racism genocide of unpopular minorities, oppression of the poor, slavery, and even the advocacy of war for its own sake are as equally moral as their opposites.
The Essay on Cultural Relativism Theory and Virtue ethics
... philosophical theory that speaks about the nature of morality. Cultural relativism theory claims that different cultures have different moral codes and nothing is ... just an opinion that varies from culture to culture. Also there is a general argument in which different cultures have different moral codes and ...
I believe this is where Pojman solidifies his argument. “Conventionalist relativism seems to reduce to subjectivism. And subjectivism leads, as we have seen, to the demise of morality altogether (Pojman).” I cannot pinpoint a con on Pojman’s argument because he acknowledges the importance of ethical diversity, and he strongly recommends that we scrutinize the cultural relativism argument to find the many loopholes that the naked eye can’t see. I believe most of morality comes as a result of selfishness in a sense where laws made were enacted to the make the strong stronger and the weak weaker. Since there will always be an inferior race, a homeless man, and a steady decline of the worlds natural resources, reformation and rebellion will always blockade any universal laws of morality because of human innate sense to compete.
