‘Mother Courage and her Children’, by Bert olt Brecht, is a play which can be seen from varying perspectives. Some consider it to be a comment on the socio-economic aspects of war, others as a criticism of bourgeois capitalism intended to encourage change in modern society. The somewhat tragic events of the play enable critics to consider it a ‘tragedy’, but one which, to some extent, diverges from the Aristotelian definition. Aristotle believed that tragedy must revolve around a central character: the ‘tragic hero’, on whom the plot focuses and who exhibits certain characteristics, which leads to his, though in this particular case, her, downfall. The role of such a figure is pivotal to the presentation of a play as a tragedy; yet it remains largely unclear with which character within the play this identity lies: Mother Courage herself, or her daughter, Kattrin. Perhaps the most obvious potential tragic figure is the lead character within the play: Mother Courage.
She demonstrates an ability to survive, through which the audience recognizes her strength of character and instinct of self-preservation. This links closely with her sense of capitalism, which she prioritizes over alternative, more virtuous qualities presented within the play, such as Swiss Cheese’s honesty and Kattrin’s selflessness. Mother Courage’s rigid capitalist stance can be interpreted as her ‘tragic flaw’, or ‘hamartia’, the term Aristotle uses to describe the mistake leading to the protagonist’s downfall. It is a flaw that Mother Courage consistently exhibits and a mistake which occurs thrice in the deaths of her children, as she is absent conducting business on all three occasions.
The Essay on Bertolt Brecht Mother Courage 2
In 1939, on the eve of the Nazi Holocaust, the great German playwright Bert olt Brecht wrote Mother Courage and Her Children. For the setting of his play, he chose the Thirty Years' War, the senseless 17 th century European conflict that pitted Protestants against Catholics and laid waste to whole lands and peoples. Spanning the years 1618-1648, it was the most destructive war in European history ...
However, despite her apparent detachment towards her children, it is evident that Mother Courage harbours genuine concern for the well-being of her children: in a discussion with Cook over future prospects, she states, ‘all I’m after is (to) get meself and children through all this with my cart’. In the juxtaposition created by the reluctant combination of the roles of the mother and the tradeswoman, it is perhaps foremost a tragic contradiction within Mother Courage’s character, rather than her role as a tragic heroine, that is emphasized. Alternatively, this contrast could be interpreted as an indication that Mother Courage is morally ‘neither all good nor all bad’, a quality which Aristotle states as necessary in a tragic hero. Her intention of and attempt at providing for and protecting her family by her existence as a ‘hyena of the battlefield’ is essentially good, yet it is in fact this very existence which brings about the deaths of her children and her own downfall. According to Aristotle, the audience must witness the tragic hero undeservedly suffer great misfortune. Although the audience disapproves of Mother Courage and her attitudes, we are not presented with a feasible alternative.
She is forced into living as a parasite of war by her socio-economic status: she is simply trying to provide for her family and the only crime she commits is the utilization of her gift of tradesman ship. Mother Courage’s misfortunes are presented as the deaths of her children, which are caused by each individual’s sole virtue, so are, in effect, undeserved by Mother Courage. An element of tragedy is removed from the play as Mother Courage does not appear to experience suffering as a result of these losses. However, this does not prevent the evocation of pity from the audience, a key factor of tragedy, as we still perceive her as a consequential victim of the social and economic context; though the magnitude of this pity is significantly reduced, and it is of a more detached quality, than if the play were presented in a more emotive style.
The Essay on Notes on mother courage and her children
Work used: Mother Courage and Her Children by Bertolt Brecht Reflective statement: how was your understanding of cultural and contextual considerations of the work developed through the interactive oral? In Mother Courage and Her Children the aspects of familial ties versus greed and the effect of war on humanity were explored using the technique of epic theater. In an attempt to further remove ...
The downfall of Mother Courage is far from orthodox in Aristotelian terms. Whereas a tragic hero would conventionally die as a result of a reversal of fortune, Mother Courage is the sole survivor of her unwavering exploits. In addition, Mother Courage’s actions in the final scene prove that she has learned nothing: she pays little attention to the death of her daughter and the play closes with her attitude of ‘Got to get back to business again’. The absence of catharsis is a direct result of Brecht’s alienation technique: rather than targeting the audience’s emotions, Brecht focuses on increasing the audience’s awareness of an aspect of society which is unjust in order to provoke change by appealing to their reasoning above their feelings and thus it would be uncharacteristic of Mother Courage to purge herself of emotion. Through her insouciance, it becomes clear that Mother Courage does not possess enough virtue to be considered even remotely heroic. This renders her distinctly dislike able.
Although many tragic heroes, such as Arthur Miller’s Willy Loman and Shakespeare’s Macbeth, may not always appear moral and righteous, there is a significant and permanent lack of compassion on the part of Mother Courage, which is displayed in Loman’s suicide to provide for his family and Macbeth’s relationship with his wife, which hinders her status as a tragic heroine. Loman also demonstrates that, due to the effect of time and social development upon Aristotle’s theory, the circumstances of the ‘common man’ can be tragic, a principle which certainly applies to Mother Courage, despite Aristotle’s favour towards ‘noble’ tragic heroes, such as Macbeth. By contrast, humanity and compassion are Kattrin’s upstanding qualities. This is poignantly demonstrated in Scene Five when Kattrin selflessly ‘dashes’ into the ruins of a house to rescue a baby, while her mother refuses to donate linen to help the injured peasants claiming ‘I! – got to think of meself’.
The Essay on Mother Courage Brecht Children Business
Mother Courage It's always important to be touched. Writers know and understand this idea. Whether the audience feels good or bad about whom or what you present is not as important as the fact that they feel something. Bert olt Brecht's Mother Courage and Her Children is a perfect example of a work that doesn't leave us in very high spirits but touches us in such a way that it becomes even more ...
Kattrin’s personality is antithetical to that of Mother Courage: she is self-sacrificing and generous, whereas Mother Courage repeatedly prioritizes the interests of herself and her business. These qualities are significantly more heroic than any which Mother Courage could possess; Kattrin is ‘generally good! – and fine’, which is specified by Aristotle. At the climax of the play, she becomes a martyr as a result of her death in an attempt at alerting others that their lives are in danger. This is Kattrin’s ‘noble and complete action’; a deed that we could never expect from Mother Courage. She dies for a cause that is worthy in her eyes, yet her goodness and generosity pass by largely unnoticed by anyone other than us, the mere observers. The audience is undoubtedly compelled to pity Kattrin above any other character in the play.
Pity and fear are key emotions that should be aroused in the audience by the tragic hero, and Kattrin acts as a contrast with other characters such as Eil if, whose actions we understand, but condemn. Kattrin’s muteness due to an unknown incident with a soldier during infant hood creates an empathetic feeling towards her character. Alternatively, Kattrin’s dumbness ‘from war’ can be interpreted as suffering, and it is certainly undeserved. Kattrin experiences further distress when she is assaulted while obtaining supplies from town for her mother. This induces a change in Kattrin, and possibly a reversal of her fortune, as is indicated by her sudden lack of interest in Yvette’s red boots. It appears that Kattrin accepts that she will now never be desirable to men and therefore will never be married and have a family of her own.
From this moment, she is dedicated to protecting others with a refreshed selflessness, and is highlighted in the following scene when she risks her life to save the child’s. With the exception of her final act, Kattrin does precisely as she is instructed, despite the consequences. This is demonstrated in her resistance to her assailant after Mother Courage warns her ‘don’t let them steal nowt’: Kattrin returns with the articles but has been assaulted as a consequence. This is the first glimpse of Kattrin’s sense of duty to others as a flaw that will lead to her downfall.
The Essay on Red Badge Of Courage Summary And Character Analysis
Stephen Crane has written many remarkable poems, short stories, and novels throughout his short life (He lived only to the age of 29). The Red Badge of Courage is a tale of war, life, responsibility, and duty. It has been considered the first "great modern novel of war"(Alfred Kazin). It traces the effects of war on Henry Fleming, a Union soldier, through his dreams of battle, his enlistment, and ...
Mother Courage’s ‘Song of Solomon’, relating the danger of the virtues of her and her family, foreshadows Kattrin’s death through ‘unselfishness’. A sharp contrast is made between the two women in Mother Courage’s notion that virtues are simply ‘wickedness es’ and the increasing effect of Kattrin’s strengthening morals on her actions. This builds up to the climax of the play, where Kattrin’s selflessness is realized as her tragic flaw. There is a clear obstacle in Kattrin’s position as a tragic heroine in that she is not the central character, making it difficult to envisage her as the true tragic heroine of the play. However, she could not realistically carry the lead role in such a play due to her muteness, as it would hinder characterization and plot development. Nevertheless, Kattrin is on stage for a considerable proportion of the play, suggesting that although she may not hold the most prominent position, she acts as a closely connected tragic antithesis to the lead role, Mother Courage.
In conclusion, it could be argued that either of these two women in ‘Mother Courage and her Children’ could be described loosely as a tragic heroine, but I believe that Kattrin displays the heroism and virtue that are required to be considered worthy of this title: Mother Courage is absorbed in a society where the possession of heroic qualities is not only impossible, but irrelevant. The combination of tragic circumstances with Brecht’s ‘Verfremdung’ technique prevents tragedy from overpowering other aspects of the play, which accounts for the difficulty in identifying a true Aristotelian tragic hero.
