Warfare During the Renaissance Warfare did not get invented during the Renaissance, but there were some significant innovations. Feudal cavalry lost its strength of the battlefield, infantry gained in stature, states learned how to field large armies for long periods of time. Most important of all, however, was the use of gunpowder. The chief result of these innovations was that warfare once and for all was taken out of the hands of private individuals (the nobility) and was taken over by the nation-state. Moreover, war became so expensive and destructive that it became ever more difficult and dangerous for small states to wage war, even at the local level.
Warfare became big business and the business of big players. Decline of feudal Cavalry Up until the 14 th century, the battlefield belonged to the medieval knight. The knight of 1300 was well armored. Plate mail was still in the future, but armor had developed to the point where most of a knight was covered in metal, and even his horse wore padded armor. The knight was adept at the use of the lance, the sword and the shield, and was every bit as effective on foot as he was on horseback. What happened in the 14 th century was that there emerged other forces on the field that could withstand the feudal cavalry charge and could even win battles.
The most notable of these were the English Long bowmen and the Swiss Pikemen. English Longbows The English longbow was much bigger than other bows. It was as tall as a man or taller and could fire with accuracy well over 200 yards. An English archer could fire accurately three arrows a minute and when pressed could double that rate. A hundred archers could launch a thousand arrows a minute, with withering results, due to the fact that there arrows were much lighter, and wind caused them to change direction after about 50 feet. The longbow is credited with the English victory at Cr& (1346) and Poitiers (1356).
The Term Paper on Origins of English
I was a lunatic to have dreamt of such thoughts. My mind was braising through every memory that lurked my mind at that very moment. As I looked out my bedroom window, the night -so magical, so mysterious. The moonlit sky encrusted with shimmering diamonds, and Luna the moon, a cosmic chandelier smiling down at me as she floats high overhead. The rustling of palm leaves, brushing the windowsills, ...
Because an arrow fired from a longbow could pierce chain mail armor, it gave to common foot soldiers a weapon that could withstand the nobility. Not surprisingly, the noble class despised both crossbows and longbows. A Longbow was reasonably cheap to make and Edward III was able to require all able-bodied Englishmen to become proficient in its use. Archers alone were not enough to win the day, but they modified battlefield tactics, serving as mobile field artillery. Pg.
1 Warfare Swiss Pikemen The Swiss pike was a nasty piece of work. Anywhere from 14 to 20 feet long, the pike was in effective the infantryman’s version of the lance. At its end it had a point for impaling, a hook for grabbing, and often a blade for cutting. There were many variations on these. As with the longbow, the real effectiveness of the pike was not so much the weapon itself but how it was used on the battlefield.
The Swiss became adept at fighting in formation. A solid square of Pikemen, with the front lines planting their pikes in the ground, presented a bristling wall that cavalry charges were generally unable to break. As with the English, too, the Swiss fought as traditional infantry once the cavalry charge was thoroughly disrupted. The Swiss Pikemen wore only light armor, for mobility was important and his real armor was his fellows in his unit. So long as they held together, they were protected, and it was long time before other armies learned how to break up a Swiss square.
WarfareGunpowderThe invention of guns, handguns, artillery, field artillery – changed warfare in ways that were unimaginable those days. Effective cannons meant that castles were no longer safe. Field artillery and handguns revolutionized battlefield tactics. And all of this made warfare far more expensive, so that governments were driven to heroics of taxation to pay for their wars. The old ways still became a natural way of life for the people for a long time. Castles continued to be built, and if it were on the edge on a high moat, even a traditional castle could rest securely out of range of most guns.
The Term Paper on Arguments on Gun Control
With the Second Amendment giving American citizens the right to bear arms, and approximately fifty percent of Americans owning some form of a firearm, issues involving the ownership and possession of guns have led to heated debates in American society. Most notably is the issue of gun control. Many feel that the some form of gun regulation is necessary in order to lower the level of gun related ...
But more and more castles had to be designed or re-designed with an eye of cautiousness for bombardment. This changed the status of knights. Even a relatively minor noble in the middle ages could retreat to his castle and be safe against all enemies. That refuge was less sure in the 15 th century. Moreover, new castles were significantly more expensive to build, putting them out of reach of the lesser nobility. Nor could many nobles afford their own artillery — cannons tended to be owned only by the very powerful.
Pg 2 A central part of specialists grew up around the gun business. Cannons required not only men and animals for transportation, but also technicians who knew how to dismantle and reassemble them, and fire them once they were in place. Amateurs, of course, could do these things. Cannons showed a tendency for exploding, which encouraged investors to use professionals. By the 16 th century, artillery officers were becoming specialists, with training in math and ballistics. The big cannons were useful for blockade and little else.
The huge bombardments of the 15 th century could fire only a few times an hour, with little accuracy. As the century progressed, the founders cast better, started making nice round metal cannon balls, the quality of the gunpowder improved, and artillery pieces became smaller, more accurate, and more effective. The smaller, more accurate guns could be transported more willingly, required smaller crews, and could be fired a lot quicker. By the late 15 th century, the French were using field artillery against infantry. The days of the Pikemen were closing in, and fast. Warfare Gunpowder: Handguns The earliest handguns were little more than very small cannons.
The gunner planted one end in the ground or simply held the thing while another fired it, rather like a bazooka. The harquebus (portable firearm) was the first to have a stock, but in our period harquebusier’s were never an important issue on the battlefield. The handgun really belongs to the next age. but, the way was clearly marked. When the individual soldier could wield the terrible power of the gun, a key ingredient of the modern army had been created. The most significant effect of gunpowder was that it required the resources of the nation-state to exploit.
The Essay on Gates of Fire 2
Why I chose this book: I have no particular reason why I chose this book. While searching through the commandant’s new reading list, the title of the book stood out to me. It did not seam like a boring documentary or and endless biography that goes on and on but rather an interesting read that would keep me interested. When I went to go check it out from training I read the summary on the back of ...
It took money, organization, and sustained effort to put into the field armies with cannons and harquebusier’s. To meet these demands, princes learned to tax their people annually and efficiently (or, at least, more efficiently than before).
In effect, the nation-state was always at war, or at least taxed its people as if that were so. This was due to the creation of standing armies, which had to be paid for continually. Princes took the control of armies out of the hands of their barons and put it in the hands of professionals paid by the royal fisc. City-states and small principalities lacked the ability to wage war at this level, and they began to surrender to the larger nation-states.
Pg. 3 Chris Poet.
