National Defense: A Political Perspective The defense of our nation has always been a strong issue throughout America’s political history. Although our nation has not existed a long period of time, our country has had to take up arms to make the world safe for democracy many times. Liberals and conservatives are also constantly up in arms over the issue of the best way to defend the country. One of the foremost issues in the ongoing debate is that of a Ballistic missile defense program. The idea was first pitched during the tense period of the Cold War. Colin Powell, a prominent conservative, saw Missile Defense “at the time the time not as a Utopian dream but as a useful way of throwing a scare into the war planners of the Soviet Union” (Keller, 1).
Typically, Republicans as far back as Ronald Reagan have embraced the idea of a “Shield” against the hostile intentions of any nation with ballistic missiles, but many remain skeptical of a technological dependence that such a system would incur. George W. Bush believes in a limited Missile Defense program, but in order to institute advanced testing of the technology, a way around the A. B. M. treaty would have to be found.
This treaty was made in order to reduce the nuclear arsenal of both Russia and the United States. Conservatives generally embrace the program as a viable solution to one of the nation’s top priority’s in homeland defense. Liberals have viewed the idea of a Missile Defense program as being unrealistic and feel that the project should only be given minimal consideration in the defense budget. Concannon 2 The “Star Wars” space based program especially has met with strong criticism from liberals throughout the last two decades, cited as being to costly to ever be an option for Missile Defense. Some liberals feel that the program is not unreasonable and feel that advanced testing should be considered as technology gets better every day. The issue is still very much unsettled though as “Before the anti-terror campaign, the issue of missile defense was the single most important test of how the Bush administration would balance the new primacy of unfettered American self interest…
The Essay on Does Student Exchange Program Involve a Nation’s Identity?
There are 5 interviewees that have different backgrounds which are student, teacher, parent, and student exchange organizer. Most of them said that this kind of program is very beneficial and good for Indonesian’s youth characteristics. 2. 0 Introduction Student exchange in this case is a short term visit of students between two different schools and country to learn each other culture, and its be ...
.” (Keller 1).
Perhaps the most debated issue between Conservatives and Liberals in the area of national defense is that of the our defense budget. “Military spending overall, which fell after the Cold War, is now budgeted to start climbing over the next five years” (Pemberton 2).
Military spending was severely cut after the lack of necessity for it, but now the issue of military readiness comes into play. The budget of our nation’s military was designed to accommodate fighting and winning two major wars at once, but many conservatives feel that we are spread too thin to accomplish that. “The angry and frustrated Republican response to Kosovo is caused, in part, by the president’s refusal to pay the cost of his military commitments” (O’Beirne 1).
During the first six years of his administration, President Clinton deployed the military more times than in the past thirty years put together. This angered conservatives as many felt that our once proud armed forces were no longer capable of protecting the nation’s interest on the limited budget that they were given. “Our present defense budget does not adequately meet the requirements of today’s Marine Corps” (O’Beirne 2).
The Essay on Wilson The Liberal And Conservative
The main reason that the United States Senate failed to ratify the treaty of Versailles was the opposition forces, both liberal and conservative, formed an overwhelming body that enabled them to defeat any proposal that Wilson or his various collaborators could bring about. The body that opposed Wilson was composed of a huge variety of forces representing a huge section of the political spectrum. ...
Conservative members of the Congress still press for a more substantial budget for the Armed Forces.
Concannon 3 Liberals feel that the budget for the country’s military is substantial enough to adequately protect the nations interest from hostile intentions. After the Cold War, many Liberals called for a cap on defense spending as the United States no longer had a reason for such a sizable amount of money to be spent on weapons that were now no longer necessary; “Here was a chance to rethink U. S. defense policy in light of the demise of the Soviet Union: to identify cold war relics…
, to examine the opportunities for deep cuts in the nuclear stockpiles, and to scrutinize sharply the military budget in an age of balanced budgets” (Pemberton 1).
Liberals feel that the money that is freed up from budget cuts for the military would be better spent in areas that develop the country such as education or Medicare. Although the United States has committed to make the world safe for democracy, liberals still feel that U. S.
citizens should come first. All of the information presented for this paper war primarily written before the World Trade center bombing, as to give a better view of both political spectrum’s true beliefs on the issues involved with the defense of our nation. In closing, liberal and conservative viewpoints differ in many areas, but in National defense, some of these differences are easier to see. Which side has the right idea of the best thing for our country is unclear, but both present good, logical arguments about the way they feel things should be done. Concannon 4 Works Cited Keller, William.
“Colin Powell on Missile Defense.” 25 November 2001. Online. Available web O’Beirne, Kate. “Defenseless.” National Review. May 3, 1999 p. 18-19 web Miriam.
“Military Peer Review.” Nation. May 26, 1997 p. 24 web.
