This essay summarizes the key aspects of Rowlandson’s captivity story; the reasons behind her captivity; how she juxtaposes the bible and her experiences; the trials and tribulations that she had to confront in the hands of her captors; the type of succor that she received during her moments of crisis; her attitude towards her Native Americans captors; the culture, traditions and attitude of the her captors namely the Algokian Indians; the hardships the Indians had to endure at the hands the colonists; my thoughts on her narrative Rowlandson’s vivid and graphic description of her eleven week captivity by Algokian Indians has given rise to one of the finest literary genres of all times. The author has also used her traumatic experience to dictate a narrative that asserts her faith in puritan theology. The placidity between the colonists and the Native Americans was declining. The colonists were on a rampage of encroachment into lands owned by Native Americans. This triggers a 3 year war between King Philip, a Wampanoag chief, (referred to as Metacom by the Native Americans) and the colonists.
This war had a major impact on the author’s life, if not the Native Americans life as well. During the war the English colonists run out of food. In order to obtain food they drive Algonkians out of their own country and accumulate all their provisions and supplies. This shows the inhumane treatment meted out to the Native Americans at that time.
The Narrhagansets, a Native American tribe, who had formed allies with King Philip, were one such group who came under this tyranny of the colonists. Narrhagansets having run out of food, try to seek retribution by killing some of the colonists and holding some colonists captive as servants. In one of these battles, at Lancaster, Massachusetts, the author along with her children also gets captured in one such raid. Her brother-in-law and her sister die in the attack. The authors child Sarah gets wounded, and eventually dies a few days later. Her children get separated.
The Term Paper on Native Americans in “The Pearl” by John Steinbeck
Steinbeck’s The Pearl is one of his most intriguing pieces. Steinbeck manages to fit many different ideas into a short novella that is under a hundred pages. However, what makes The Pearl truly a great book is his critique of colonial society, and the interaction of Native Americans and colonists. Steinbeck emphasizes the differences between the colonists and the native Indians by using such ...
This portrays the revengeful attitude and nature of the Native Americans. This also indicates the fact that despite going hungry and homeless for days, the native Americans resist the domineering rule of the colonists. The author is held captive by the Native Americans for a ransom. She led a nomadic life and had to work in order to obtain food.
She goes starving for days. Whenever she tried resisting their orders, she is threatened that she would be killed and in one instance, one woman even hits her with a stick. She made clothes or hats for the papoose and got food in return. In spite of the hardships she had to face, the Amerindians were kind to her in many ways. When she offered the shillings that she got for the clothes she made to her master, the master did not accept it and asked her to keep it.
The Amerindians did not prevent her from seeing her son or reading the bible. Finally After the many months of arduous life, she is released for a ransom of 20 pounds. The author asserts that the success of the Amerindians was not due to their act but was an act of God. In spite of all her afflictions, she affirms and attests her faith in God and the bible and draws immense strength from it. She believes that her tribulations and experiences are gods ways of testing her faith. She thinks that puritans are instruments of god.
The following statement illustrates this fact.” For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are my ways your ways saith the lord.” (Pg 221 Para 1) The narrative also gives a vivid description of the author’s attitude towards her captors. She thinks of the Native Americans as savage and uncivilized. She also believes that Native Americans are Satans and diabolical creatures, whom the colonists had to fight. The author wanted to drive home the message that decimating the native American tribe was in the national interest. I think the author is prejudiced in this regard. How can one explain the barbaric acts of the colonists? Were the colonists viewed as Satans by the Native Americans? She often calls their acts barbaric.
The Term Paper on Use Of American Indian Images In The Boy Scouts And Camp Fire Girls
Use of American Indian Images in the Boy Scouts and Camp Fire Girls Taking into consideration such organizational movements as the Boy Scouts and Camp Fire Girls, we may focus our attention on these organizations usage of American Indian images. Boy Scouts and Camp Fire Girls use American Indian images pretty often in various kinds of activities and specific to the organizations staff. One of the ...
Throughout the narrative, she often expresses her dissension towards Native Americans. The author believes that the sorrows, hardships, hazards and perplexities that colonists had to face were Gods way of correcting the sinful ways of the colonists. She often asserts the fact that Native Americans were just objects created by God and they were not a reality. “For they are the vanities of vanities and vexation of spirit; that they are but a shadow, a blast, a bubble, and things of no continuance” From the narrative, one gets a clear idea about the culture, attitude and beliefs that Algokian had. They often told lies and made the least effort to tell the truth. For instance, when the author enquires about her son to one of the captors, he gives a graphic description of how the son was butchered and he himself had eaten his flesh.
The following statement illustrates this -” I made enquiry after him… he asked me that such a time his master roasted him and that he himself did eat a piece of him ” (pg 220 para 2) They were very audacious and did not fear resisting the colonists even if it meant death to them. They rejoiced and hoped to signal that the enemies were killed and captured in the battle but mourned for their own kith and kin. They considered begging a disgrace. They were not loyal to their wives; often slept with many women. However, in spite of their demoralizing values, they did not abuse the author through word or through action.
They respected the talents that the author had. I think this indicates a contradiction towards her attitude towards the Indians and her factual experience with them. In conclusion, this essay highlighted some of the key aspects of the narrative. In my opinion, the author has targeted this narrative to Puritans and to drive home the point that the native Americans had to be killed because it was in the national interest. I think that the author is prejudiced and biased towards the Puritans. In spite of the authors attempts to garner support against the native Americans, I am not persuaded.
The Essay on Public Policies Towards Native Americans
Public Policies Towards Native Americans Native American Policy is the set of laws and procedures developed and adapted in the United States to define the relationships between Native Americans and the federal government. Over the course of two hundred years, this policy has undergone many changes. At times, the federal government has recognized indigenous peoples as independent political ...
My heart goes out to the Native Americans. This narrative could be compared to the war that president bush is waging against Iraq.
