Most candidates coped reasonably well with part (ii) by describing circumstances such as insecure and unstable loads, manoeuvring with the load elevated, colliding with kerbs and other obstructions, cornering at speed, braking harshly, driving on uneven or soft ground, and mechanical failure. Those who gained high marks for this part tended to be those who adopted a structured approach and considered the load, the environment and the vehicle itself. Part (iii) was generally well answered with candidates outlining methods of segregating pedestrians from vehicles by the use of barriers, defined traffic routes and one-way systems. They also took into account training and supervision of the drivers and visibility issues, such as the need for good lighting, mirrors and high visibility clothing. Section 2 Question 2
The question was generally answered well, with the majority of candidates outlining a hierarchy of measures beginning with attempts to prevent entry by the use of fencing and signs, and monitoring by the use of security patrols or closed-circuit television. This was followed by reference to the need, should entry be gained, to make the site itself safe by isolating services, reducing heights of materials, covering or fencing excavations, as well as removing ladders and denying access to scaffolding. Better candidates also considered further precautions such as securing tools, chemicals, equipment and vehicles. Question 3 For part (a), candidates were expected to identify symptoms such as reddening, blistering and cracking of the skin. The majority achieved this although few considered the further possibility of infection or ulceration.
The Essay on Commie Dearest Communism And Momism In The Manchurian Candidate part 1
Commie Dearest: Communism and Momism in the Manchurian Candidate Introduction The Manchurian Candidate (1962) is a movie, which we can clearly define as psychological thriller. But at the same time, unlike most of the movies that belong to this genre, Manchurian Candidate promotes a certain philosophical worldview, which can hardly be considered as politically correct in our time. It shows the ...
In part (b), marks were available initially for recognising that the nature of the agent, concentration levels and the duration and frequency of exposure were some of the factors that might influence the likelihood of dermatitis occurring when dermatitic substances are handled. Additional factors that could increase the risk include cuts and abrasions, which would allow chemicals to be absorbed more readily, existing skin conditions, the type of skin and its sensitivity, the specific site of skin contact, poor personal hygiene, and the misuse or non-use of protective measures. Some candidates, instead of addressing the risk factors, detailed the precautions that should be taken to prevent dermatitis. While many of these were undoubtedly correct, and the lack of such precautions would affect risk, they were not directly relevant to the question that had been asked. Question 4
