“We know there will be problems in environmental terms, many serious problems, but it is a matter of economics. There won’t be any complete disaster, and what we cannot solve, well, that’s the price we have There is a constant war that is being fought in the rainforests of South America. The death toll is one that far surpasses any other war in history. Vietnam and World War II had minimal loss of life compared to this never ending battle. It is predicted that by the year 2020, the casualties will reach 150 per day. This total does not even include the loss of human life due to the lack of oxygen and the unsuitable living conditions. This horrible scenario would be the result of mankind’s failure to cooperate and live in harmony with the environment, especially the rainforest of South America.
In the end, the destruction of the rainforests will mean the The devastation of the rainforest may be compared to playing a game of Russian Roulette. One-forth of existing medicines are derived from tropical plants whose homes are in the rainforests of South America. For every acre that is lost in the burning season, there is one acre less that we have for possible life saving medicines. About 70 percent of plants used in anti-cancer drugs come from the rain forest. We are slowly destroying ourselves and the environment. Whether we realize it or not, the world could quickly come to an ecological halt.
Every day 144,000 acres of the rainforests are cut down, slashed and/or put up in flames. In 1974, Brazil started a forest fire of 20.6 million square feet (3,900 square miles).
After the emancipation of slaves in 1862, the status of African-Americans in post civil war America up until the beginning of the twentieth century did not go through a great deal of change. Much legislation was passed to help blacks in this period. The Civil Rights act of 1875 prohibited segregation in public facilities and various government amendments gave African-Americans even more guaranteed ...
The fire ragged out of control and was later marked the largest forest fire in Brazilian history. This 1974 fire is now considered small to others in the past recent years. On average the burning season lasts up to four months out of the whole year. During this period of time, it is not uncommon for the majority of South America to be covered in a thick blanket of smoke. The bulk of these fires, when combined, are equivalent to the great inferno of 1988 at Yellow Stone National Park.
Emitted from these devastating fires every year are billions of carcinogens and poisonous gases that end up in the atmosphere. The gases and pollution have been building for many years, and scientists believe that the atmosphere is due to reach its saturation point very soon. The greed for money and lust for land are just two flames at the heart of the fire. At the expense of innocent lives of rainforest dwelling animals and local environmentalists, large corporations can some how justify there murderous means. Rainforests cover only a mere seven percent of the earth’s land surface, yet they contain 50 percent of the world’s species. Along with the thousands of animals in these century old forests, there are many tribes of Indians who are subjected to torment and usually death from the large companies.
Heartless Corporations such as Endesa, Arboriente and PICOP ignore the blockades of the FPA, “Forest Peoples’ Alliance”, and the perpetual pleas of the Scientist’s who predict, “tropical species are disappearing at a rate that could conceivably reach as high as 150 species a day by the year 2020″ Landry, (5).
Unfortunately this battle comes down to economics versus environment, and so far the environment Chico Mendes’ death finally brought the much needed world wide attention to the rainforests. Until 1988 the astonishing figures produced by environmentalist and scientists never had much weight on the conscience of countries outside of the Amazon Rain Forest. The death of Mendes was the second death of a NCRT, National Council of Rubber Tappers, member in recent times. The fight, ” at first, was only about ecology, and defending the fishes, the animals, the forest, and the river. They didn’t realize that humans were also in the forest” Rodrigues, Revkin (1).
Afforestation is the process of establishing a forest on land that is not a forest, or has not been a forest for a long time by planting trees or their seeds. Afforestation is the establishment of a forest or stand of trees in an area where there was no forest. Reforestation is the reestablishment of forest cover, either naturally (by natural seeding, coppice, or root suckers) or artificially (by ...
Though Chico was a rubber tapper in the town of Xapuri, he spent most of the year traveling around the world trying to gain support in his fight against the destruction of the rainforest . Chico’s non-violent approach won him much favor from the United States and all of the other rubber tappers. Chico Mendes once said, “If a messenger came down from heaven and guaranteed that my death would strengthen our struggle, it would even be worth it. But experience teaches us the opposite. Public rallies and lots of funerals won’t save the Amazon” Revkin (1).
Mendes had recently returned home from a six week long visit and rally in the United States. Three days before Christmas he was shot dead in the doorway of his house.
Hundreds attended Chico’s funeral, and despite his asking for no flowers, since he knew they were going to be picked from the forest, someone left one bouquet on his coffin. Mendes gave his life for the rain forest. In essence, he was the first “Green Martyr” of the Amazon, and hopefully not the last. It is the ruthless logging companies along with the complete ignorance of the local peasants and governments that aid in the yearly loss of the hundreds of thousands of acres of essential rainforest. In Latin America cattle ranching for export trade is the chief culprit in rain forest The bullheaded ranchers fail to see the effects of their burning the land. After land is burned and raped of the minerals the land becomes dead. These are some of the problems but, ” Land degradation caused by grazing is by far the greatest challenge in Latin America” Caufield, (113).
There is a false illusion of an endless rainforest, so every couple of years, the ranchers move on an either try and sell the land or burn more of the rain forest and convert it to pastures. The U.S. does not offer much help, the destruction of the rain forests takes five cents off the price of an American hamburger. The United States buys up three quarters off all Central American beef exports. Perhaps after all there are more criminals than we think, the US is also directly responsible for the devastation of mankind. Maybe the South Americans just support our greediness and “necessity” for food, which the majority of goes to waste.
... the rain forests. "Worldwide boycotts are the most effective ways of stopping rain forest destruction." (Kristula 1997) The countries which hold the rain forests ... snares are mainly used to catch animals of the rainforest. Years ago, natural fibers were used in the construction ... dioxide is the major gas involved in the greenhouse effect, which causes global warming. "Human activities are altering ...
Maybe not, but we are to immersed in our own fervor to realize that we are digging our own grave. Despite all of the attacks on the ranchers in the past decade, “it is still good business to clear virgin forest in order to fatten cattle for say five to eight years and then abandon it” Caufield, (112).
The answer to our problem is already known, but we just do not want to listen. Science does not lie therefore sooner or later mankind will start to feel the major The long term effects from the deforestation of the Amazon are already showing worldwide. The one major effect is the earth’s climate. The “greenhouse effect” is caused by the rise in the level of CO2 in the atmosphere.
Eventually this could make the temperature rise five degrees every couple of years, and in theory cause London and New York to be The scientists of the world are not all in agreement on every issue but, “in some way shape or form there will be drastic changes in the climate as a direct result of rainforest destruction” Shiguango, (7).
The destruction of 40 million acres of rain- forest a year causes a major dent on the species living in these regions. Magnificent and beautiful creatures of God are being innocently killed by the destruction of their homes. In the last twenty years, four major damns have been built in Latin and South America. The most recent, The Tucurui Dam, is twelve miles long and when filled, the reservoir will destroy 800 square miles of virgin forest and put an end to over 10,000 different species, not including the 9,000 Indians who once lived at the bottom of the basin. What seems to be a small aspect in our life now will have a profound effect in the future. Simple items that we take for granted now, such as tropical woods, bananas, nuts and other materials such as rattan will soon be available in much smaller quantities. The effects of deforestation maybe still inconspicuous to many, but soon it will start to effect us all in one way or another.
Conclusion: due to the above listed points which strongly oppose divorce, there should be reforms to make it harder to get a divorce. PROPOSAL Divorce: should there be reforms to make divorce harder? Concerns of research: this paper is concerned with the effects of divorce and how it affects the society as a whole. It explains why divorce is rather negative thereby highlighting the adverse effects ...
Through our own imprudence and default we have let the innocent lives of billions of people and animals, around the world, fall into the hands of cattle ranchers, peasants and government officials. We have yet to learn that the environment will always promise us life and a future, and economics will only keep us happy for a while before it destroys us. Thus the war between the two has been going on for nearly 200 years, and it is not close to being over. The distant light at the end of the tunnel is faint. The spreading of knowledge is a slow process that takes many years. Hopefully, if we work together to save the rainforest we can make up for our own negligence and win the war against ourselves. 1. Andrew Revkin, The Burning Season (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2.
Robert M. McClung, Vanishing Wildlife of Latin America (New 3. Catherine Caufield, In the Rainforest (New York: Random House, 4. Jamie Shiguango, “An Experiment in Rainforest Conservation” Cultral Survival Quarterly Spring 1988: 56-59 5. Alexander Shankland, “Brazil’s BR-364 Highway: A Road To Nowhere” Ecologist July/Aug. 1993: 141-147 6.
Sue Landry, ” Saving the Rain Forest: A Patch of Hope” St. Petersburg Times 27 Feb. 1994, 1f+(1-14)