Social Responsibilities: 1. Health Aspect a. Find better ways to cut down on fat and calories Is Starbucks adding to the growing weight problem with American society? You be the judge. I personally was shocked at the nutritional facts on their products (Figure 1).
Some fast food places offer healthier products than some of the Starbucks products (Figure 2).
The nutritional facts circled in red in figure 1 and figure 2 shows that one cup of Starbucks Pumpkin Spice Cr’e me with whip is less nutritional than an entire meal at McDonalds.
Imagine what the nutritional facts would look like if you included a Classic Coffee Cake with your coffee beverage! (Figure 1. 2) The Starbucks nutritional values listed below are not completely accurate as shown in the following statement: “The nutrition information for beverages is based on Starbucks (R) standardized beverage recipes. Because each of our beverages is handcrafted and may be customized, some variation can be expected. The data is calculated using ESHA Research’s Genesis (R) R&D software. All data is rounded to meet current United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) packaged foods labeling regulations.” Works cited: (web info. asp) This means that depending on your taste, the fat content and calories could be more than what is shown in the chart.
Figure 1 – Starbucks Nutritional Facts (Beverages) (web info. asp) Figure 1. 2 – Starbucks Nutritional Facts (Food Items) (web fresh food detail. asp) Figure 2 – McDonalds Nutritional Facts (web) What is Starbucks planning to do to lower fat and calories in their products? Starbucks is offering non-fat milk and soy to help trim down the fat and calories. The alternative ingredients do alter the flavor a bit, so it may not be the choice of most customers. b.
The Review on Affect of Fast Food
Finally, this work will investigate the major factors that affect customer’s choice in fast food and to understand the relationship between food consumptions and health. This study has made a qualitative examination of fast food consumption among individuals of various nationalities and ethnicities in various countries specifically as related to consumption of fast food through an extensive review ...
Advertise to public about fat content of their products It seems like Starbucks doesn’t want the general public to really know how bad the nutritional facts are right up front in their stores. If you walk into a Starbucks store you see mostly pictures of some of their least nutritional coffee beverages because they look the most appetizing. I think if more people knew how bad Starbucks products were they would see a significant reduction in revenue. This would be especially true with today’s low care, low fat health trends.
Starbucks does however provide a nice nutritional facts chart on their website, but who is looking at the website while ordering anyway? So as far as I can tell Starbucks plans on feeding America’s sweet tooth and will continue to fatten them up. 2. Store design impacts environment Starbucks seems to be environmentally conscious about their stores. They look for better ways to build a store to be more environmentally conservative.
Some of the things that Starbucks look at when building a new store are the following (Figure 3): Paints with lower amounts of volatile organic chemicals; Reduced flow water fixtures that conserve water; Efficient lighting; Design store to capture available natural daylight; Cabinetry made from 90% post-industrial material; Wood flooring made from FSC-Certified products Figure 3 – Starbucks Store Design (web design pop. htm) In addition, Starbucks is helping to establish environmental scorecards for the retail industry as shown in the statement below.” For the last two years, Starbucks has played a leading role on the Retail Development Committee of the U. S. Green Building Council (USGBC).
Our involvement has been focused on developing a scorecard for retailers, based on USGBC’s Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) standards. Originally intended to pilot in 2003, the project is now expected to be introduced in 2004.” (web).
