Sophocles uses a mixture of both visual and emotional imagery to create the morally questioning, Greek tragedy ‘Oedipus Tyrannos’. He presents the audience with an intense drama, which addresses the reality and importance of the gods that the Greeks fervently believed in. The play also forces the audience to ask themselves if there is such a concept as fate. From the very beginning of Oedipus, it is made clear “that his destiny be one of fate and worse.” The irony is that Oedipus unknowingly repeatedly predicts his own fate: “It was I who called down these curses on that man.” Oedipus has unconsciously married his mother and killed his father, just as the Oracle predicted. Fate is proven to be unavoidable to Oedipus as the play shows a devout belief in the Greek gods. The Gods are seen as both “protectors” and “punishes”, who can “turn fate back away.” The gods are shown to have power over everything and everyone, and whoever ignores them will be cursed by the “darts no one escapes.” Oedipus is one of these people who is seen to have ignored the gods’ warnings and therefore has brought a curse upon himself, and all those around him: “Nothing grows in the earth, nothing in the wombs of the women.” With the idea of fate comes the question of fairness.
Does Oedipus deserve his pitiful destiny and if it was so pre-decided then why? It was yet again the God’s powers. It may be difficult to avoid pitying Oedipus, as despite his obvious sins, he is shown to be a respectable and honest man: “I bear more pain for the people than for my own soul.” Sophocles uses irony to increase your growing pity for Oedipus as he searches for the ‘abomination’ that is soon to be revealed as none other than himself: “That man must reveal himself to me.” Oedipus is frantic to find the killer of Laos (his real father) so as to save the city from the “hateful plague” that the gods have brought upon them. When Oedipus gouges out his own eyes, the difference between visual sight and insight is clearly represented: “Light, let this be the last time I look on you.” Oedipus cannot bear to see the destruction that he has brought upon his family. “Would the sight of my children have been pleasant?” he asks himself, now left in the depths of shame.
The Essay on Milton's Paradise Lost And His Justification Of The Ways Of God To Man
When John Milton decided to write, he knew from the start he wanted his creation to be that of an epic. Paradise Lost is just that. It is Milton’s own take on the biblical story of Satan’s fall from grace as well as man’s fall. Milton was not only armed with an extensive knowledge on the Bible, but in everything a man of his time could learn. With his wisdom he emersed himself ...
Due to the severe punishment that Oedipus inflicts upon himself it makes it difficult for one not to have respect and sympathy for him, as we are constantly reminded that he is “ill fated.” There is an alternative expected reaction from the audience and that is to blame Oedipus, and to take little or no pity on him. He is given many warnings and he often chooses to ignore them. “Do I have to listen to any more?” He refuses to hear the truth or listen to the prophet’s warnings, stubbornly claiming to “have nothing to learn.” The prophet Tiresias rightly points out: “You look with your eyes but can’t even see where your going – what troubles lie ahead.” Oedipus is seen as “Shirking the oracles”, running away from his destiny, and in doing so somehow making his futures pain both greater and more certain. “But Poly bos takes these oracles down to Hades with him.
They are worth nothing.” Oedipus’ blatant disregard to hear the truth about himself could be seen to be both ignorant and arrogant, and his reactions to the prophet’s wise words are often ill-judged and hasty; as he passes them off as “moronic words.” Oedipus refuses to heed the prophet’s warnings and because of his inability to take heed of them, he is damned by those around him: “let a bad fate chew him to bits.” Due to the fact that ‘Oedipus Tyrannos’ is a typical Greek tragedy on which most other tragedies are based, the audience is prepared for the sorrowful ending that befalls upon Oedipus. They would have had a greater respect for him to begin with as he is a leader, and therefore of course their disappointment could be as equally great. When Sophocles wrote this play in 429 BC, the Greek audience to whom it would have been performed to would not have been shocked either, but their reactions to Oedipus’ behaviour would have been less sympathetic due to their belief that one should listen to the Gods. The Greeks believed greatly in the gods just as this play reflects, this enhances the feeling of being disappointed with Oedipus. He appears to have been “reckless”: after all, as Oedipus says himself, “only a bad man would ignore what the God says.” Yet he does: he blames Kroon and Tyressias who informed them of the truth and labels them liars. At every interval in the play, the characters pray to the gods for their help and blessings.
The Essay on Oedipus A Victim of Fate
In the play Kind Oedipus, by Sophocles, Oedipus is caught in a series of tragic circumstances. When only a few days old he is left on a mountainside to die because of an oracle telling that he will grow up to be the murderer of his father the king. However, the baby is found and taken to the nearby city of Corinth, where Oedipus is adopted as the son of the king and queen. He is never told about ...
This would be appropriate because this play was originally performed at a religious festival. It is only in the gods that the Greeks hold all their faith; they beg them to “defend us, give us strength to drive out the pollution.” Ironically, Oedipus is, in fact, this ‘pollution’ and Sophocles again informs the audience that Oedipus’ fate is irreversible, the god’s decisions “always there, around him, encircling, tightening.” Sophocles uses the chorus to represent the audience and reflect their thoughts and emotions. The chorus is shown to respect and admire Oedipus, saying “he was good to the city” and therefore they cannot believe that he is evil. It is perhaps because they respect Oedipus so much, and because of their refusal to believe that he has committed any crimes, that they are left so angry and let down by their ruler when they learn the truth: “We called you our king and we honoured you.” When they learn of his deeds, their disgust is apparent, and the chorus exclaims, “How I wish I’d never known you.” Oedipus represented both the idealistic lifestyle and the most commendable leadership qualities and so the chorus relays their obvious confusion on how to judge him: “I can’t agree, I can’t deny… I’d want more proof before I sided against Oedipus.” In the mist of all the confusion, the chorus also has the ability to bring calm and release the tension, especially when in worship; “you can turn fate back.” Both the language and the structure of Oedipus shows just how ironic Oedipus’ life is, and just how drastically his luck reversed. “Which of the Gods leapt on your fate with such a destructive force?” The chorus plays a major part in the overall structure of the play, controlling the general climax of it.
The Essay on Oedipus The King Escape His Fate
Oedipus the King by Sophocles is about Oedipus, a man doomed by his fate. Like most tragedies, 'Oedipus the King'; contains a tragic hero, a heroic figure unable to escape his / her own doom. This tragic hero usually has a hamartia or a tragic flaw which causes his / hers ' downfall. The tragic flaw that Sophocles gives Oedipus is hubris (exaggerated pride or self-confidence), which is what caused ...
Even when the play reaches its peak the chorus is used to conclude the play, summing up the moral essence of the story; that one can never escape from one’s fate. The audience is left puzzled by just how suddenly Oedipus’ luck runs out as he starts as “a man of power, few looked on him without envy” and ends up as a distraught man begging to be excommunicated from everyone that knows his sins: “Hide me, kill me, throw me into the sea.” Sophocles uses strong language to create the emotions that flood this play, and even the chorus asks: “Whose life has twisted more painfully” than Oedipus’, a man who had “luck, happiness and wealth.” This is what makes the Oedipus story so tragic, the fact that his doomed fate was so decided, so unavoidable, and Oedipus when trying to run away from the truth, ran straight into it. The cultural background of this play increases the overall sense of tragedy for the audience. Oedipus to begin with is shown as a respected, “all powerful” king. He is seen to have had the support of the gods previously when they “helped” him “to bring order back into” the lives of his followers. This is why the Gods turning on him is so alarming, “Can a God who brings these things to pass be called anything but a cruel God?” Oedipus’ original image of a man close to perfection is gradually diminished, as he becomes a broken and blind man.
In the end he uses his power one more time to pass judgement on himself by first gauging out his own eyes, “Ranting, they would not see what evil he was suffering, what evil he was doing”, and by then ordering his people to “Expel me from this land as quickly as you can.” Oedipus’s else of dignity also swiftly disappears toward the end of the play, but he manages to redeem himself by accepting all blame for his actions and does not even attempt to pass it on to someone else. He could have blamed anyone from his parents, the servant that saved him as a baby and even the Oracle, but he does not. He shows great courage when he says: “My evils are mine and will affect no one but me.” Oedipus goes from a man who has unquestionable and perhaps a dangerous amount of power to a man who himself relinquishes all rule of his land to live a life of misery that he feels he deserves. The gods and fate play a massive role in creating the tragedy, but Sophocles leaves it up to the audience to pass final judgement on Oedipus. There is a definite moral to this play and that is no one can ever know their decided fate until they die, for “How can we say anyone is happy until he has crossed to the other side without suffering?”.
The Essay on Personal Philosophy of Man , God and the World
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT First of all, I am grateful to the Almighty God for establishing me to complete this project. I wish to express my sincere thanks to SOTERO H. LAUREL Librarians, for providing me with all the necessary facilities and books that I need to be able to carefully analyze all the topics that have been discuss in philosophy of human existence. I also thank Professor Josefina C. Perez, one ...
