‘No two men are alike in the way they act, the way they think, or the way they look. However, every man has a little something from the other. Although Oedipus and Gilgamesh are entirely different people, they are still very similar. Each one, in their own way, is exceptionally brave, heroically tragic, and both encompass diverse strengths and weaknesses. One is strictly a victim of fate and the other is entirely responsible for his own plight.
Out of the two men, Gilgamesh was far braver than Oedipus. He risked his life a number of times when he was in the company of his friend Enkidu. In addition, he risked his life following Enkidu’s death whilst he went to uncover the secret of life and death to save Enkidu. Gilgamesh believed that he could do anything, ‘Gilgamesh, who feared nothing, might have been expected to say, ‘then it’s I who will go out and subdue him [Enkidu] and bring him captive to the city” (Bryson, 5).
Gilgamesh would have fought any monster or conquered any feat that stood in his way. Following the death of Enkidu, Gilgamesh was determined to unearth the secret of life and death to bring his friend back from the afterlife. He had to cross many dangerous paths which ‘no one who [was] alive [could] cross… .’ however, he never gave up and finally reached Enkidu. Both men had tragic outcomes; however, Oedipus’ ending was by far the most heartrending. The tragedy of him being a ‘son, And a husband, to the woman who bore him; father-killer, And father-supplanter’ (Sophocles, 38) is by far inferior to Gilgamesh loosing a friend to the afterlife.
The Essay on Bull Of Heaven Gilgamesh Enkidu Man
... committed with Gilgamesh. Soon after the dream Enkidu gets very sick and dies. Gilgamesh is heart broken by the death of his friend, he ... to go civilize him, the priest shows the wild man named Enkidu the ... very displeased with him. Soon Gilgamesh starts to hear rumors of a wild man who lives with animals; Gilgamesh sends out a priest ...
Oedipus was a victim of fate; he wasn’t able to control what his conclusion was. Oedipus’ tragedy led him, not to want to die, but to live in total emptiness. ‘I would not rest Till I had poisoned up this body of shame In total blankness. For the mind to dwell Beyond the reach of pain, were peace indeed (Sophocles, 64).’ His pain was so immense that even death was too superior for him. He chose to remove his eyesight because he felt that he was too undeserving of death, that a life of blindness would be a more superior form of punishment for him. Oedipus demonstrated great strengths while he lived in the city of Thebes.
He was a very caring man; when his people needed aid ‘[he] willingly would do anything to help [them]’ (Sophocles, 26).
When the people of Thebes asked Oedipus to bring their land back to normal, he did everything he could to find out who was polluting the earth. Oedipus was also a very prosperous and successful man. He was the.’ … Greatest of men; he held the key to the deepest mysteries; [and] Was envied by all his fellow-men for his great prosperity… .’ (Sophocles, 68).
People from distant lands knew the name of Oedipus; he who conquered the Sphinx and helped Thebes become a flourishing city once again. However, King Oedipus also had his weaknesses. When Teiresias came to Thebes, he tried to save Oedipus from the agony of what he was asked to tell him, ‘I mean to spare you, and myself. Ask me No more.
It is useless. I will tell you nothing’ (Sophocles, 35).
Nevertheless, Oedipus did not believe Teiresias or take his warning and threatened the old man to tell him everything. If he had left well enough alone, then he would not have discovered his misfortune. Oedipus also blames his best friend, Creon, for making Teiresias say the things that he did ‘Have you the face to stand before my door, Proved plotter against my life, thief of my crown’ (Sophocles, 40).
Oedipus accused Creon of wanting the crown; yet, Creon had no notion of taking it from Oedipus.
He was too imperceptive to see that what the prophet had said was true and his best friend was not plotting against him. Gilgamesh, like Oedipus, had many strong points amid his lifetime of heroic battles and dangerous journeys. He showed vast devotion to his great friend Enkidu, ‘If they took you, I would sit by the gate of the underworld and never move until they released you and brought you back!’ (Bryson, 21).
The Essay on Oedipus Rex Man Life Sophocles
Oedipus Rex Throughout history, writers and philosophers have expressed their views about how the life of man is ultimately defined in their works. The Greeks have played their part in this quest. One of the great plays of the ancient Greek world that led the way for others was Sophocles' Oedipus Rex. In this play, Sophocles shows us a chapter from the life of man. Throughout the book, he hints at ...
Gilgamesh loved his friend and would do anything for him; he would even go to the underworld for Enkidu. In addition, Gilgamesh showed great determination on his journey, ‘Even if my heart fails, I will go on! In heat or cold I will go on! Sighing or weeping I will go on! (Bryson, 24).
He was told that he would not make it to his destination by all the gods that he conversed with; although, he kept going and believed that he could make it.
Gilgamesh’s main weakness was that he did not heed the Gods warnings to him. He was told, before going to the underworld that when goes toward the gate of the underworld, he must discard his clean garments lest he arouse the envy of the dead. He must not wear sandals lest their noise arouse the sleeping. He must not carry a staff or a spear lest he offend those who trembled before the staff, and anger those who fell before the spear.
(Bryson, 36) However, ‘dressed in his royal tunic and golden sandals, with his spear on his back and his staff in his hand’ (Bryson, 36) he left for the underworld. Gilgamesh was specifically told that he mustn’t wear those clothes for he would anger the inhabitants of the underworld. With this warning in mind, he still approached the gate fully clothed with spear and staff. Gilgamesh was completely responsible for his plight, for he chose to join Enkidu when he finally found him. Each man, Gilgamesh and Oedipus, had their own attributes and each had certain weaknesses that brought about their downfall. Oedipus was merely a victim of fate which made him a much more tragic character than Gilgamesh who chose his ending.’.
