Oedipus the King While reading classical literature one is bound to run into many types of heroes. The different types of heroes can range in their greatness, but above all, the tragic hero is viewed as being the most alluring of them all. A tragic hero, as defined by Aristotle, is a man who is great but also terribly flawed, who experiences a fall in misfortunes while still remaining admirable to the audience at the end of the play. One of Aristotle’s favorite works, Oedipus the King, a play by Sophocles, is a play that above all others, defines the meaning of what a true tragic hero really is. In the play, Oedipus the King, the story unfolds after Oedipus unintentionally kills his own father and goes on to marry his mother.
The events of the play are tragic, but it is the way that Oedipus handles the tragedies that make him a tragic hero. From the very beginning of the play, we can already see that Oedipus is a great but flawed man. He proves to us to be a great and courageous man because of his extreme intelligence and cleverness. At the opening of the play, the chorus attributes Oedipus with solving the tricky riddle of the Sphinx and saving the city of Thebes from the gruesome creature. Oedipus’ intelligence seems to come to him naturally yet he was “taught… nothing / no skill, no extra knowledge [from the Thebans], [yet] still [he] triumphed,” (46-47).
Oedipus also shows the audience his greatness by demonstrating the extreme amount of passion he has for the city of Thebes. At the beginning of the play, when the city of Thebes looks to Oedipus for an answer to the ruthless disease that is plaguing the city, he replies with a compassionate voice, “Your pain strikes each of you alone… but my spirit / grieves for the city, for myself and all of you” (74-76) and that “[he] would be blind to misery / not to pity [his] people kneeling at [his] feet” (14-15).
The Essay on A Hero Martin Luther King
A Hero: Martin Luther King Martin Luther continues even posthumously to remain a champion hero to the freedom loving people not only in America, but the world over. We can not imagine the world without a figure like him having graced our world and for providing a rudder to a world sailing without direction as far a human rights and freedom are concerned. In fact, whenever there is any talk or ...
However, in spite of all of his positive qualities, he is a man that is prone to arrogance and impulsive behaviors. At the opening of the play, when he addresses the city about the plague, he tells them not to worry for “Here I am myself… the world knows my fame: I am Oedipus” (7-8), implying that he can solve any problem simply because of who he is.
Oedipus also shows his arrogance by comparing himself to the gods. After hearing the chorus’ cries to the gods for help he tells the city of Thebes to “Let [him] grant [their] prayers… listen to [him]” (245-246).
Oedipus displays his quick temper after the prophet Tiresias declines to tell him who Laius’s murderer is; he hastily becomes infuriated at the prophet, telling him he is ‘scum of the earth…
[a man who] would enrage a heart of stone’ (381).
The heart of the story unravels when Oedipus apparently begins to suffer a reversal of fortunes. At the beginning of the play, Oedipus is referred to by the priest as the “king of the land, [the city of Thebes’] greatest power” (16).
Through all of Thebes he is thought of as a hero, a man who saved the city from the Sphinx and in his bravery has promised to find the killer of King Laius in order to save the city from doom and death. However, at the climax of the story Oedipus learns that he has been “cursed in [his] birth, cursed in marriage / and cursed in the lives [he] cut down with [his] hands” (1310-1311).
After learning that he has killed his father and married his own mother, he realizes that the prophecy has been fulfilled and that he is the one who has cursed the city that he so desperately loves with a plague that will soon destroy his city.
Despite Oedipus’s e ries of unfortunate events he somehow remains admirable to the audience at the end of the play. The audience sympathizes with the character in the fact that he cannot not help or prevent any of the things that happen to him. What makes Oedipus great is the selfless way in which he handles these problems. After learning the he is the one to blame for the horrible plague he takes full responsibility for his actions rather than trying to flee the punishment he so rightfully defined for the criminal. Oedipus could have taken the easy way out, like Jocasta, and taken his life but instead he takes Jocasta’s brooches and gouges out each one his eyes stating, “What good were [his] eyes to [him]? / Nothing [he] he could do could bring [him] joy” (1472-73).
The Essay on Hamartia with Respect to Oedipus in the Play ”Oedipus Rex”
Hamartia with respect to Oedipus in the play Oedipus Rex. The tragedy must not be a spectacle of a virtuous man brought from prosperity to adversity: for this moves neither pity nor fear; it merely shocks us; nor again, that of a bad man passing from adversity to prosperity…It must concern a man who is not eminently good and just, yet whose misfortune is brought about not by vice or depravity, but ...
Even after his excruciating punishment he insists on being “drive[n]/ out of the land…
where [he] can never hear a human voice again” (1572-73).
After facing up to his punishment, Oedipus seems to show compassion for everyone but himself.
