Ozone Depletion Case for ” Ignoring the Facts” Ozone forms a layer of the earth’s atmosphere that protects us from the sun’s deadly ultraviolet rays. During the last decade there has been a scare set forth by environmental enthusiasts that Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) destroy the ozone layer. Although there has been no evidence of any CFC destruction of the ozone layer there is an international stoppage on using CFCs, as well as an executive order set forth by Clinton to limit the sell and use of CFCs in the United States. These bans are unnecessary, since they are merely based on fear and politics. Basing the ban on evidence can not be possible, because there is no factual evidence.
This executive order is not only futile, but ridiculous. Facts are the ozone layer is not depleting due to CFCs or any other manmade chemical. Qualified scientists have proven the whole notion of the ozone layer is not something fixed and finite to be destroyed faster and slower rates. It is simply not a resource like a fossil fuel. The process by which CFCs are supposed to deplete it is highly speculative and has never been observed to take place, and even if it did, the effect would be small compared to what happens naturally. Ozone is dynamic.
It is constantly being created and destroyed, and as long as the sun emits rays the process will continue. Ozone is the Trioxide molecule (O 3), which is created by photons radiated from the sun. A normal oxygen molecule (O 2) consists of two oxygen atoms, in diatomic form. High energy ultraviolet radiation known as UV-C can split one of these molecules, through a process known as photo dissociation, into two free oxygen atoms.
The Essay on Recovery And Recycling Ozone Cfcs Cfc
ChloroflourocarbonsChloroflourocarbons were discovered in the 1920's by Thomas Midgley, an organic chemist at General Motors Corporation. He was looking for inert, non-toxic, non-flammable compounds with low boiling points that could be used as refrigerants. He found what he was looking for in the form of two compounds: dichlorodifluoromethane (CFC-12) and (CFC-11). In both compounds, different ...
These atoms then join with a third oxygen and form ozone. Some ozone is found at ground level, but most occurs in the “Ozone Layer,” a concentration of O 3 approximately 30 miles above the Earth’s surface. Most ozone is produced in the tropics where ultraviolet flux is the strongest. Ozone is destroyed by chemical reactions that convert the O 3 molecule into O 2.
The reaction that causes this is mostly nitrogen dioxide (produced in part by high altitude cosmic rays), through ultraviolet dissociation by the same UV-C that creates ozone, and also by a less energetic band know as UV-B, which is absorbed in the higher regions of the atmosphere. Every incoming UV-B photon dissociates an oxygen molecule, which is what gives the ozone its ultraviolet screening ability. The height and thickness of the ozone layer are not always the same, but rather it adjusts automatically to compensate for the moderate incoming ultraviolet flux. That is when ultraviolet flux is greater, it penetrates deeper in turn creating more ozone which in turn blocks more of the incoming photons. Even if the ozone layer suddenly vanished there would still be 20 to 25 miles of oxygen rich atmosphere which would become available for ozone creation. In 1974 two overly energetic chemists, Rowland and Molina, theorized the same chemical inertness that prevents CFCs from causing corrosion and makes them nontoxic, also would allow the molecules to remain intact as they diffuse throughout the atmosphere.
High energy ultraviolet radiation would soon dissociate these particles into free chlorine particles which in turn would react with the ozone molecule to form chlorine monoxide and a normal oxygen molecule, and as a result ozone would be destroyed. This theory becomes more guileful by stating the chlorine monoxide molecule would dissociate and thus a single chlorine molecule can then run amuck in the atmosphere, destroying all ozone molecules. The theory also overlooks the fact most CFCs released from the surface will never reach the stratosphere. In other words, CFCs do not rise in significant amounts to altitude where UV-C photons can break them apart. Because ozone absorbs the heat directly from the sun’s rays, the stratosphere exhibits a thermal inversion effect. That is, as one rises in altitude the air cools until a point is reached where the stratosphere begins and the air begins to warm from this heat absorption.
The Term Paper on The Ozone Layer Chlorine Oxygen Cfc
... hits a CFC molecule it causes one chlorine atom to break away. The chlorine atom then hits an ozone molecule consisting of three oxygen atoms and ... they are in the troposphere with high-powered infrared lasers located on mountainsides. CFC molecules can absorb up to 30 infrared ... radiation has been able to penetrate the atmosphere with a higher intensity. Already, on the base of the Antarctica food ...
It is at this point a thermal barrier (Tropopause) prevents vertical air movements and the interchange of gases (including CFCs) from reaching the stratosphere. One can see this fact with a typical thunderstorm. The cloud raises rapidly until it reaches the Tropopause where at once it flattens and spreads to form an anvil head. Thus very little air is exchanged across the Tropopause from connective currents. Because of this, CFCs in the stratosphere rapidly decline to only two percent of their surface value.
At the same time, less than two percent of UV-C penetrate below the Tropopause. As a result the number of CFC splitting possibly is drastically lower than the hypothesis assumes. If UV photons make it through the Tropopause, there are over 136 million oxygen molecules for it to collide with for every CFC in the Troposphere. Even here, when the UV photons hit oxygen molecules, the reaction will create ozone not destroy it. So even if the big CFC molecule has three times the chance of a small oxygen molecule of being hit, there would be approximately 45 million ozone molecules created for every CFC that is broken down.
High concentrations of chlorine have been found over the Anartic, but there is nothing to link those chlorine concentrations with CFC from the other side of the world. The reporting of the high chlorine levels failed to note the readings were taken at McMurdo Sound which is located 15 kilometers downwind from Mount Erebus, an active volcano venting 100 to 200 tons of chlorine a day, and in 1993 it averaged 1000 tons per day. It could be that the volcano might have a little more to do with the high chlorine levels over the Anartic than refrigerators in New York or air conditioners in Los Angles. The world produces 1.
The Report on Ozone Layer – Paper
The ozone layer is a layer in Earth's atmosphere which contains relatively high concentrations of ozone (O3). This layer absorbs 97–99% of the Sun's high frequency ultraviolet light, which is damaging to life on Earth.[1] It is mainly located in the lower portion of the stratosphere from approximately 13 km to 40 km above Earth, though the thickness varies seasonally and geographically.[2] The ...
1 million tons of CFC annually, 750, 000 tons of which is chlorine. Twenty times as much comes from the passive out gassing of volcanoes. This can rise by the factor of ten with a single large eruption. For example the one in Tambor a in 1815, pumped 211 million tons of chlorine into the atmosphere. Why didn’t this natural event destroy the ozone layer? On a larger scale, 300 million tons of chlorine are contained in the ocean spray blown into the atmosphere every year. A single thunderstorm in the Amazon regions can transport 200 million tons of air per hour, containing 3 million tons of water vapor.
On average, 44, 000 thunderstorms occur daily, most of which are in the tropics. If the depletion theory was true, the chlorine that mankind produces is nothing compared with what is thrown into the atmosphere by nature. While government grants for research of the negative effects of CFCs are in the tens of thousands, there are no grants to study the positive effects of ultraviolet flux. It is curious that all the grant proposals written by scientists concerning the other side of the CFC issue are being turned down. Is ozone depletion created by political / economical issues? It has not been proven by facts-just ignoring the facts.
All this while the media plays on the fears of the general public. As Bob Holz knecht, a CFC engineer for twenty years observes, “Nobody’s interested in reality. Everyone who knows anything stands to gain. The public will end up paying through the nose, as always, but the public is unorganized and uniformed. Bibliography Begley, Shannon, “Is the Ozone Hole in Our Heads?” Newsweek, 122, October 11, 1993. Bush, David A.
, ” Ozone Anxiety: It’s a White Thing,” Harpers Magazine, 287, December 1993. Kerr, Richard A. , “Stratospheric Injection by Volcanic Eruptions,” Science, 260, May 21, 1993 Zur er, Pamela S. , “Researchers Lack Data on Trends in UV Radiation at Earth’s Surface,” Chemical and Engineering News, 71, July 26, 1993.
