Attention Grabber: Statistic-“Secondhand smoke causes almost 50,000 deaths in adult nonsmokers in the United States each year, including approximately 3,400 from lung cancer and 22,700-69,600 from heart disease. (American Lung Association) 2. Although smokers are the one’s directly inhaling the smoke from their cigarettes, they put everyone’s life in jeopardy. Those around them are not given the choice as to whether they will inhale the toxic air. With the increasing evidence of the dangers of smoking and second-hand smoke, there is no longer a place for smoking in society.
Thesis-It is imperative that the federal government bans the sale of cigarettes to promote the safety of its citizens. Concession and Rebuttal: 1. Smokers believe they have the freedom to smoke as the U. S. provides freedom of choice; therefore, as citizens, they have the right to smoke if they so choose. 2. Nonetheless, their freedom to smoke impedes other citizens’ liberties as they do not get to choose whether or not to inhale air contaminated with second hand smoke that may be harmful to their health. 3. According to www. smoking-facts.net, 3,000 nonsmoking adults die of diseases caused by exposure to second hand smoke every year.
If given the freedom to choose, an individual would not put their health at risk and choose to breathe second hand smoke. 5- 8. Repeat process with a 2nd concession and rebuttal 9. In order to protect all citizens, the federal government must eliminate the sale of cigarettes within American society. Body Paragraphs: Paragraph #1-More importantly, smoking-related problems among children require they be protected by the law. 1. behavioral problems.
The Essay on Secondhand Smoke Calgary Air Smoking
Health is a very important issue to many people. Everywhere you look there are billboards, commerical's, or even television shows that encourage you to get, and most importantly, stay healthy and fit. Now, you may exercise everyday, eat right, and you may look like a contestant from the "Fitness USA Parent;" but inside, you are most likely just as bad, and if not worse than anyone else. "What ...
Karl Hill, a research associate professor at the University of Washington’s Social Development Research Group states, “If your parents were smokers it is a double whammy because you are more likely to use drugs in general and even more likely to smoke cigarettes. ” (http://www. medicalnewstoday. com/articles/49400. php) Hill and Jennifer Bailey, a UW research scientist, conducted a study exploring smoking, heavy drinking and marijuana use across three generations. Their findings indicate that the children of a parent who uses any of these substances are more likely to smoke, binge drink or use marijuana in adolescence and adulthood.
Children whose parents smoke in their presence are being set up to repeat the same behavior or even worse, turn to harder drugs. Consequently, a child’s behavior may be damaged by their parent’s smoking habit. c. The researchers also found a link to child behavior problems such as conduct disorder (getting into fights, stealing), attention deficit disorder (lack of focus, can’t sit still or maintain attention) and oppositional defiant disorder (problems with authority).
d. If the child does not end up acquiring their own smoking habit, their behavior in general is harmed.
They are at a disadvantage to succeed in life while their parents freely practice their personal freedom. 2. life-long health issues a. College students who were exposed to high levels of environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) as children maintained higher blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, and heart rate at rest and during psychological stress compared to students who grew up with low levels of ETS (http://www. scienceblog. com/community/older/1999/C/199902721. html) b. The tobacco smoke in the home environment has a lasting effect on the children who inhale it.
As adults they cannot escape the harm the second hand smoke causes. Life is full of challenges and obstacles, parents who smoke only create more problems for their children. If parents are incapable of modeling appropriate behavior, the government must intervene and not allow adults’ cigarette smoke to be a detriment to a child’s future. Paragraph #2- In addition to protecting the health of innocent children, the environment needs sheltering from the destructive smoke cigarettes produce.
The Term Paper on Divorced Parents Children Vs Married Parents Children part 1
Divorced parents' children vs. Married parents children Each year, more than 1 million children experience the divorce of their parents. In 1995, less than 60% of US children were living with both biologic parents, almost 25% were living with their mother only, approximately 4% were living with their father only, and the rest were living with step - families, adoptive families, or foster families ...
Pollution a. ETS has been shown to produce more particulate-matter (PM) pollution than an idling low-emission diesel engine. b. With the increasing depletion of air quality and the ozone, banning cigarettes can aid in safeguarding the environment for future generations. c. Aside from the emission of smoke, the packaging used for cigarettes defiles the ecosystem: 2 billion empty cigarette packs and 50 billion cigarette butts with non-biodegradable filters are disposed of each year.
The government’s prohibiting the sale of cigarettes will undoubtedly save resources that can be used to benefit society rather than wasting them to satiate individuals’ injurious addictions. Conclusion. Cigarettes are destructive to society. The government must intervene for the wellbeing of all of its citizens. Contact local elected officials Participate in local clean up days (beaches, city parks) to properly dispose of cigarette butts Contact the local health department to report public places that do not follow the law about smoking restrictions
