Phone use in Cars The use of cell phones in cars remains a topic of ongoing discussion between those who think that it is fully justifiable and those whore strongly opposed against it. Just like any social issue, it prompts people to draw conclusions that very rarely have anything to do with the essence of the problem, in the first place. The promoters of safety are using the same set of arguments that are applicable, when they want to analyze just about anything. They say that use of mobile phones in cars often become the cause of road accidents, therefore it should be banned. But if we apply the same logic to riding bicycles, for example, itll also appear that it is a subject of banning, since many people receive injuries, while doing this. It is quite understandable why Police Departments in many states also support the ban on cell phones in cars.
One doesnt have to be a genius to figure out that itll allow police officers easier promotions, since the statistics of their effectiveness will improve drastically, showing them as being able to prevent more traffic violations. Basically, there is no a single valid argument, on the part of safety watchers, against cell phones in cars. Their claim that this is an unsafe practice is just too vague and can be interpreted differently. What does the accident statistics tell us? It shows that only 300 deaths are associated with calling and driving annually in USA, while it is estimated that more then 600 deaths come as a result of people changing CDs or putting on a make up in cars, while driving. Even if death toll was much higher, public would still be willing to go along with it, as mobile phones in cars allow people to stay in touch, which is especially important for those who heavily rely on it in their everyday lives. There is one question, which effectively shuts up hysterical spokesmen for safety has anyone ever came up with statistics, which shows how many lives have been saved, because people were able to call ambulance from the road, upon encountering road accident? Sometimes cars do break down, it often happens on deserted roads, when there is only one way to get help to call for it on the phone. Those who promote ban on cell phones in cars cannot understand one simple thing there is no example in history when legislative acts were able to slow down technical progress. The governments regulative function cannot be effective, if social dynamics are not taken into consideration.
... lives have been lost on the roads due to people driving too fast, in cars that can't stand up to ... which restricts the use of cars on any and all roads in the US. These people do not understand the underlying ... need to find somewhere else to wreck their cars because other people have jobs to be at. As much as ... in other activities, like eating or talking on a phone. The new trucks would be designed by the ...
While this issue is being discussed in states legislatures, many people already use cell phones that allow them to talk, without keeping their hands busy. As matter of fact, people simply shouldnt pay any attention to those who never get tired of trying to increase public safety by implying absurd notions. It is nothing but a sign of intellectual retardation, on their part. We live in a free country, therefore our right to use mobile phones in cars, should be thought of as the civil right. It is a true that it affects others, but now its practically impossible to find a single social activity that wouldnt affect other people, in one way or another, since American society is becoming increasingly complex. Nevertheless, none takes the right of choice from safety hawks. It is up to them to permanently stay at home, if theyre so terrified of getting in car accident, caused by use of sell phone Everything good in this life come at certain price, including the convenience of being able to talk on the phone, while in car.
There is some risk attached to it, yet people should be allowed to do this, as long as they realize that this can be dangerous. I think its intolerable to distract public attention from issues that really matter, onto imaginary ones. The best way to close this discussion would be elevating mobile phones in cars to the status of compulsory items. This would make every driver being at the same risk of getting in car accident, thus eliminating the legal grounds to have arguments about this problem. Its time to realize that the process of living is dangerous. The ultimate mean of reducing all the dangers, related to living, would be death.
... zones,’ have evidently been a crucial part of a car’s safety features. They are designed so that they will crumple upon ... acts upon the object. By applying this aspect on a car’s safety systems, we are able to either reduce the risks ... control the car, it will also reduce the dangers of a collision, if it is utilised. In most cases, people survive or ...
Maybe those safety supporters should consider this, instead of continuously poisoning the lives of others with their whining.
Cell Phones and Driving. (2002).
Safety Site. Retrieved Feb. 24, 2005 from //www.safety.com/articles/cell-phones-and-dri ving.html Gray, W.
and Scholz, T. Does regulatory enforcement work?. 1993. Law & Society Review,. 27(1): p.177-213. Hahn, R., Tetlock, P., and Burnett, J. Ban Cell Phones In Cars? (Dec.
Gato Institute. Retrieved Feb. 24, 2005 from //www.cato.org/dailys/12-29-00.html.