The following were my limitations. * The person that was flinging the cork in a circular motion could never actually achieve the 90 degrees that were required to achieve perfect circular motion. * The person using the stopwatch is not accurate to the second; therefore the final experiment will result slightly altered. Analysis of procedure Unfortunately the random error on the procedure that we had to follow was too high, this caused the data to be very separated.
Because of this we had to record the data multiple times and extract the averages, with this, random error was reduced immensely. Suggestions for improvement If this experiment had to be done again, I would recommend to reduce the human factor as much as possible, in other words, If possible I would record all the data with automated machines to reduce random error. One good example of this is the angle at which the circular motion had to be spun being 90 degrees. With a machine this would have been achievable.
