Plato was a philosopher in the time of the distinguished Greek philosophers. He wrote a book entitled The Republic in which he explains some of his philosophy on subjects ranging from education to government. Plato constructed a model by which he proposed all governments evolve. He called it the Five Stages of Government. He suggested that there are five forms of government, which evolve out of one another; Timocracy, Oligarchy, Democracy, Tyranny, and Aristocracy. A Timocracy is a government of the military and of honor.
An Oligarchy is a government of money and of the rich. Democracy is a government of liberty by and for the people, and it coincidentally happens to be the government which we have right now. A Tyranny is a government of absolute power and dictation. And finally an Aristocracy is a government of philosopher kings.
Each form of government arises out of another, and so they go about in a cycle. Timocracy, Oligarchy, Democracy, Tyranny, Aristocracy, Timocracy, etc. We can compare our government of liberty by and for the people, Democracy, to Plato’s model of the five stages of government. However, we must first discuss the reasons for each of the government’s evolution and how Democracy comes about. Plato submitted that all governments, no matter how good, would out of necessity progress into other forms of government. He said that this decay was due to corruption in the form of government.
This corruption resulted in the demise of that form of government and out of its ashes arose the next form of government in the cycle. Plato proposed that most new governments begin as Timocracy; governments of the military and of honor. There are always exceptions to every proposal, so this was not absolute. Since a Timocracy is a government of honor, one would think that there would not be any corruption. To the contrary, the Timocratic man quests for power and has a fondness for money These weaknesses eventually lead to the collapse of Timocracy and the creation of the next form of government, Oligarchy.
Democracy Or Oligarchy A Comparative Essay
During the Classical Age of Greece, two powerful city-states emerged, each governed by a different system. Athens was run by democracy, whereas, Sparta, a military state, was governed by oligarchy. Athens' democracy served its people better. Since all had a say in the government and everyone was included in a state was ruled by many. In Sparta, the state was controlled by a select few, kings and ...
The Timocratic man’s fondness for money carries over into the Oligarchal state; for an Oligarchy is a government of the rich and of money. Man’s fondness of money leads him to seek out profits and to strive to be better than his brothers. Soon one man has majority of power in the Oligarchy and the people cry out. This leads to the Oligarchy’s ruin. This outcry for liberty brings about Democracy, the system in which we are involved right now. When we talk about Democracy, we have to be careful; there are many subsets of Democracy.
When Democracy first begins, there is strict representation, like that of Parliament; where a few make the decisions for the many, considering the good of the common people. This then progresses to a more sensitive representation, were the representatives ask their constituents their opinions and make decisions based on that and the good of everyone. Today we are a more sensitive representative Democracy. Our elected officials obtain the opinions of their constituents but still weigh decisions considering the entire country. After this sensitized representation comes a direct Democracy, where there is no electoral college and public officials are elected purely by the people. With the help of technology, some advocate the founding of a direct democracy in America.
“They bandy about the term tele democracy as a catchword for the establishment of direct democracy through the use of communications media.” (Arterton 14) “if one questions the American people today for their opinions as to desired political reforms, large majorities support further ‘democratization’s uch as direct election of presidents or a simple national presidential primary.” (Arterton 195) “The belief that technology may provide a needed antidote to the problems created by a representative system is the latest manifestation of a long tradition of American political thought that deplores the usurpation by political elites of power justly residing among the citizenry.” (Arterton 69) These feelings of stolen power cause for a cry for more freedom and liberty. Plato suggests that this is the downfall of Democracy; the unending thirst for more liberty. The people demand more and more freedom, eventually spiraling down into anarchy; which is the extreme form of liberty. Out of this anarchy arises a tyrant, and Plato’s cycle continues on. Our present form of government is of course a Democracy. We are in transition between a representative, republican Democracy and a direct Democracy.
The Term Paper on Police Battalion Men Jews People
Society's Influence on Morals The atrocities of the Holocaust have prompted much inquiry by researchers to understand how humans can behave so cruelly toward their fellowman. Theories have been formed that cite the men of Battalion 101 as "exceptions" or men with "faulty personalities," when, in fact, they were ordinary men. The people who attempted to perform a genocide were the same people as ...
How this affects both us and our descendants is of immense importance. Perhaps a direct Democracy will be instituted, with technology being the catalyst, and the notion of voting at home will not be such a fanciful idea. Then again, if Plato’s Five Stages of Government cycle holds true, there is every possibility that from there America will succumb to anarchy. Perhaps by that time we may have found a way to stop the progression around the cycle. Information technology influences everything. And with more information than ever, more consequences are sure to come.
Hobbes Chapter XVII I. OF THE CAUSES, GENERATION, AND DEFINITION OF A COMMONWEALTH A. Why put together a commonwealth 1. Self preservation 2. Getting out of the condition of war 3. To observe natural laws 4.
To keep the covenants they make B. Why do we need a commonwealth 1. Men compete for honor and glory, leading to war 2. People are selfish and look for the personal good rather than the common good 3. Men think that they ” re smarter than whoever is ruling them and that they can do a better job 4.
Men can warp ideas of good and evil and influence others 5. Men can’t let things lie-even when things are going well they complain 6. The covenant of men below a leader is artificial-they need something to tie them to their promises C. How do you erect a commonwealth 1. Channel the opinions of many into the voice of one or a few men 2. This results in true unity rather than just consent or concord of the people D.
The Essay on Is Man Inherently Good Bad Both
By: Alan Eugene Sims, Jr. Is Man Inherently Good, Bad, Both Psychologists often struggle with the question does man have inherently good characteristics, or do they lead to the negative. Families struggle with this question because their son has turned into a murderer, and I am also struggling with this question right now. What makes a man act the way he does Is it nature, hormone imbalances, or ...
Definition: One person, of whose acts a great multitude by mutual covenants one with another, have made themselves every one the author, to the end he may use the strength and means of them all as he shall think expedient for their peace and common defense 1. Commonwealth by institution: when the men form the commonwealth voluntarily 2. Commonwealth by acquisition: when the men are forced to enter the commonwealth 312.
