Adrienne Asch makes a valid point about prenatal diagnosis in Potok’s book, “A Matter of Dignity: Changing the World of the Disabled.” She states, “I dislike prenatal diagnosis because disability is only one characteristic of a person’s life, infant or not (169).” Although I agree with her, I still believe that this one characteristic is so time consuming, costly and emotionally draining that many couples simply cannot take on the burden. I believe prenatal testing and diagnosis should continue to be used in order to help parents make an informed decision about their future. When a couple starts thinking about having a baby they look at it from a financial and emotional point of view. Having a baby is a very costly matter, from doctor’s visits to preparing at home for the new arrival. A couple also needs to think about how a baby can strengthen their marriage or tear it apart due to the stresses a baby may cause emotionally.
Furthermore, if the couple already has children, what affect will this new baby have on the others? Now try adding the fact that the baby has a disability. The cost of having that child raises, the stress of an even more demanding child is higher, and the baby needs so much attention that the needs of the other children are ignored. Many couples would question if they could provide a proper environment for this child. The couple needs to revaluate their lifestyle and see if they could handle the extra responsibilities. Many couples’ lifestyles enable them to have this child, for others it is impossible.
The Term Paper on Prenatal Diagnosis Heredity Disorders Other Biochemical Diseases A
Prenatal Diagnosis: Heredity Disorders, Other Biochemical Diseases, and Disfiguring Birth Defects There are over 250 recognized sex-linked diseases, affecting every organ system. Of these, 95% affect males, (Emery, 1968). Despite these many sex-linked diseases, at present prenatal diagnosis can specifically be made in fewer than 40 diseases. (Emery, 1968). These sex-linked diseases are individual ...
Could a person call it ethical to bring a child into this world that isn’t going to be taken care of properly, have all of its needs met, and looked at as a person not a disability? Personally, I believe it is unethical to bring a child into a world where its needs will not be met and where it will not be loved unconditionally. I stand firmly that it is ethical to use prenatal testing and diagnosis in order to find out if the child may have a serious disability and find it unethical to abuse this technology in order to have a child of a certain sex. This I find appalling. There was an article in Newsweek recently that brought up the issue of using prenatal testing and diagnosis to determine the sex of the child. Originally this was done because of families at risk of conceiving children with fragile-X syndrome but it has become an industry of its own. Many couples who have conceived naturally children of the same sex now want to “make certain” they have a child of an opposite gender in order to “complete” their family.
When did children start becoming a fashion accessory? Prenatal testing and diagnosis should only be used in helping families know certain facts about the new baby in order to make the changes needed before its arrival. If a family cannot take on the emotional and financial responsibilities of having that child then it is unethical to bring that child into the world. But to abuse such wonderful technology for the sake of “completing” a family is a travesty. Although many of us say what we would do in a situation, it is not until we are in that situation that we decide what we have to do..
