It seems odd to speak of “preventive journalism” and preventive democracy in the same breath when it is a known fact that the media anre more focused on conflict and controversy than peace. War has become defines as news while peace certainly has not. What is good for the world, in other words, is not necessarily good for the news business. News contimually generates hostile feelings in the people that it reaches. International relations have moved out from behind closed doors and onto television screens, moving public opinion into the center of policy making so that journalism and diplomact are more closely linked than ever before. An early warning approach to news coverage is essential to spread the mass of public knowledge and support required to inspire institutions to make decisions. Television, newspapers, magazinges, and new electronic devices are needed to detect and relay the first signs of trouble in order for people to take the necessary action for their own defense. What this electronic acceleration means is that troublesome new trends must be seen at a much earlier stage if there is to be any opportunity of altering their course and controlling outcomes.
Problems cannot be left to fester until they are turned into disasters and then uncontrollable violence. The only way to effetively carry out this crucial role is by “preventive journalism.” If journalism is able to catch a crisis before it erupts and appeal to the public, preventive diplomacy would be successful. There is an accurate case of where this technique has been successful and one where it has failed. Statesmen can be driven to act, sometimes against their own judgement, when televised scenes of human outrage and tragedy shape public opinion. A classic example were the Kurds following the Gulf War when TV screens were consumed with terrible images of woment and children screaming for scraps of food and calling out for help that did not come. The Kurds are the largest minority in the Middle East and have been subjected to national oppression in countries where they reside. The Kurdish struggle for autonomy has been an explosive element of the national liberation struggle in the Middle East. The Kurds have been fighting for autonomy in their respective countries of Turkey, Iraq, and Iran sice the First World War. Although the Kurds do not have an independent nation of their own, they have always longed for one.
The Essay on Objectivity In Journalism Journalists Public Internet
Merriam Webster defines objectivity as expressing or dealing with facts or conditions as perceived without distortion by personal feelings, prejudices, or interpretations. Objectivity, as defined by the school of media ethics, means standing so far from the community that you see all events and all viewpoints as equally distant and important, or unimportant for that matter. It is employed by ...
They thought their chance to break from the tyranny of Saddam Hussein had come soon after the cease-fire with the U.S.-led coalition forces hwas declared and Iraq was torn by civil violence. Kurdish resistance fighters in northern Iraq, accompanied by Shi’ite Muslim rebels in southern Iraq, began waging open warfare against Iraq troops loyal to Saddam. Saddam ordered what was left of his military to stop the rebellions. During the Persian Gulf War, the media had continually released information that President Bush would welcome the overthrow of Saddam. This contributed to the confidence of the rebels and caused them to believe that the United States would come to their aid. However, during the post-war insurrections Bush stressed that he had never promised to intervene in Iraq’s “internal affairs.” “We’re not going to get sucked into this by sending precious American lives into this battle,” Bush said April 4. “We have fulfilled our obligations.” But when the Iraqi army brutally suppressed the Kurdish and Shi’ite rebellions, huge numbers of Kurd and Shi’ite refugees were in danger. The Bush administration took limited measures aimed at preventing disaster.
The Essay on Iraq Bush Security Saddam
President George W. Bush urged the United Nations on Thursday to force Iraq to disarm and said action was inevitable if Baghdad failed to do so. In a dramatic day at the U. N. General Assembly, Secretary-General Kofi Annan questioned Bush's right to go to war against Iraq and said multilateral action was the only way to enforce U.N. resolutions. Iraq, which has refused to allow the return of U. N. ...
The Bush administration took limited measures aimed at preventing disaster. On April 5 the press announced that U.S. cargo planes would drop food and other relief supplies to Kurdish refugees thronging the mountains along Iraq’s border with Turkey. Several other actions toward aiding the refugees were implemented shortly after the first one. Tent cities, built and guarded by British, French, and U.S. forces, were developed for safety needs. Iraq denounced the U.S. plan April 18 as a clear interference in its affairs. But on the same day it agreed under pressure to a UN plan to conduct relief efferts inside Iraq. On April 25, the administration sent Congress a letter formally requesting a $150.5 million supplemental appropriation to underwrite “Operation Provide Comfort,” as the administration’s refugee relief effort was called. Facing no resistance from Iraqi forces, the allies created a safe haven for the refugees as they slowly began to return home. But the slow process was difficult because of the Kurds’ lingering fear that Saddam still threateded their survival. As the Kurds’ tragedy was paraded before milliions of viewers, public demands for action rose rapidly.
France’s foreign minister waid the world had to intervene. Britain’s prime minister, John Major, urged creation of a safe haven inside Iraq. President Bush resisted for days and Newsweek ran a headline that asked: “Where Was George This Time?” Then he finally buckled and rushed troops into Northern Iraq. Mistreatment of the Kurds was an old problem; what was new was the power of mass-media coverage to mobilize public opinion acress national borders and force a multilateral political response. The public was informed regularly on events and actions taking place. which was a positive factor in practicing “preventive journalism.” It is no longer enough for journalists to stand alongside history, merely recording the scenes as they occur because another unseen world cries out with warnings they do not hear. For example, where journalism is very accurate at covering riots, it is ill equipped to discover the causes of riots in enough time for society to avoid or prevent them. This sort of jourmalism would be an extreme force in preventive diplomacy and this was proven in the case of the Kurds. By reporting problems in their earliest stages, the media would bring public pressure on officials to move sooner rather than wait to find solutions.
The Term Paper on Refugee Problem Source War Refugees
The Palestinian refugee problem first started in 1948 during the 1948 Civil War. This war was between the Jewish Zionists and the Arab League and was a dispute over the UN partition plan. This war ended in Jewish victory and the refugee problem started because this war saw the end of the state of Palestine and the creation of Israel and small areas of occupied territory. There were then further ...
This way, both institutions can focus their attention on problems before they become crises and , with the aid of news coverage, mobilize public support for action. In these tumultuous times of problems and contradictions, technological challenge and rising competition, the concept of reforming the media to be an effective source of preventive journalism may seem remote. But what is remote when time has collapsed and taday is already yeaterday, and tomorrow is today, and the future is tomorrow? Many facts argue against the pssibility of preventive journalism, such as cost and resistance to change. However, we are living in an age when what seemed probable to experts never happened, and what seemed impossible became a daily surprise.
