John Marshall means in his statement that the constitution does not allow the judiciary branch to rule in such a way that Marbury would like. Although Marbury did lose his job, the context in which he earned his job was unconstitutional. Marshall’s statement is referring to the inability of the judiciary branch to compensate Marbury for a job which was given in an unconstitutional way. Meriwether Lewis Journal (1805) 1. Native Americans and Lewis and Clark Expedition formed a relationship with each other.
Often times seeking help, the expedition went to the Native Americans seeking information on the geographic topography of the foreign westward lands in which they were traveling to. Other the hand, the expedition offer unique opportunities to the Indians that they couldn’t get otherwise, which explains why the offered help to the white men. One of these opportunities is the Indian’s belief that they could acquire guns from the Lewis and Clark Expedition.
The Native Americans reacted to this in a positive and supportive way as they realized that they could possibly acquire the guns and ammunition they desired from the expedition that they could not otherwise get from sources such as the Spanish. The reactions from the native Americans as Lewis describes them are on most cases mutually benevolent, each trading with one another fairly, and providing a good in exchange for another good. Henry Clay, Speech Opposing President Jackson’s Veto of the Bank Bill (1832) 1. Henry Clay compares Jackson’s veto to French Monarchy in such a way that makes the veto seem like an abuse of power.
The Essay on Lewis And Clark Expedition Americans American
"My response; they do matter!" Captain Meriwether Lewis and William Clark took the risk of life, limb, and liberty to bring back the precious and valuable information of the Pacific Northwest of the United States territory. Their accomplishments of surviving the trek and delivering the data to the U. S. government, have altered the course of history, but have some Historian's and author's stating, ...
Clay believes it doesn’t “reconcile,” with an representative government. He links the arrogance of the French Monarchy to a seeming arrogant, and tyrannical act of the president. I believe the argument is persuasive, any time when an American official is accused of perpetrating actions that resemble an Monarchy the American public typically listens. In this particular case Henry Clay compares the two to make Jackson appear irrational and abusive. Overall, I believe that Clay’s appeal to the pride of Americans is effective in his attempt to show the injustice of Jackson’s veto. . Jackson’s conservative views on the National Bank caused for much political animosity. Embodying an approach to economics similar to that of the Jeffersonians in years past, Jackson’s views on small, agricultural based business, lead to much dispute in an growing country. Northern elites feverishly disputed Jackson’s veto, as they were typically the ones investing in economics and trade; meanwhile, the commoners throughout the country supported Jackson in what they believed to be an act of protection from the president for the common man.
Much debate over Jackson’s economic views lead to sectionalism during his presidency. Overall, due the highly conservative nature of Jackson’s actions and views concerning the national bank, many conflicting and agreeing interests sparked controversy over Jackson’s veto of the Bank Bill. Memorial of The Cherokee Nation (1830) 1. The Cherokee have multiple reason as to why they believe the relocation of their people is not a good thing. First, the Cherokee believe they a “right to live on the land of their fathers,” and that many laws passed for American treaties protect them from the white “intruders. For example the author states, ” the treaties with us, and the laws of the united states in pursuance of other treaties, guarantee our residence and our privileges, and secure of from intruders. Our only request is that these treaties may be fulfilled, and these laws be executed. ” They also believe that the negative views towards the Cherokee are off and don’t apply to or justify the actions by the American government to exile the Cherokee. For example the author states, “we are certainly not rich; nor have we ever boasted of our knowledge, or our moral or intellectual elevation.
The Term Paper on Socialization Of Jewish People Into American Community
Socialization of Jewish people into American community Many different social and ethnic groups have migrated to America to start new lives. Certainly, each of these groups was unique and each group socialized differently. The purpose of this essay is to evaluate the dynamics of socialization of Jewish people that came from different communities all over the world. These people had to learn how to ...
But there is not a man within our limits so ignorant as not to know they have the right to live on the land of his fathers. ” Overall the Cherokee don’t believe the exile of their people is the morally correct thing to do. 2. The author declares that he expects to see “nothing but ruin before us in the country west of the Arkansas territory. ” Due to the fact that the Cherokee are unknowledgeable to the this new and foreign area, the Cherokee believe they will be unable to prosper in it.
The language barriers between the people of the area, combined with lack of plentiful food and water in the area, leads to grim expectations for the possible future life of the Cherokee, if they were to be forced to live there. The author also talks about the people whom he refers to as “savages,” that roam the “neighborhood,” basically looking to murder and kill. All of these factors lead to the inability to produce, in which the author believes will cause ruins, and leave only remnants of what used to be a powerful people.
