Assis ng Product Line Additions: Managers must identify the situations in which variety is an important competitive variable, examine the relationship between variety and cost, understand the underlying determinants of cannibalization and complementary, and asses the consequences of not responding to competitive innovations. Conjoint analysis is useful for managers who evaluate new product line components. By allowing managers to identify the mix of attributes that is most likely to achieve market acceptance, these techniques provide good estimates of the probabilities for success of new items. When a product line expansion is considered, it is important to realize the significant financial investments or incremental recurring costs. Decision Model: New products are treated as capital budgeting exercises where financial worth is evaluated by calculating the stream of future earnings from the new product. When a new product represents an addition to a firms product line, two other elements are considered: Will the new product be a partial substitute for an existing product (cannibalization) or is this new product complementary to mine to realize cross-elasticities with the other products.
The 5 Key Elements in this model are: 1. The sales benefits from offering greater variety through product line extension 2. the fixed costs associated with extending the line 3. the cannibalization effects 4. the anticipated lost sales from inaction (ie failure to upgrade or extend the line) 5.
Created by two avid surfers, Billabong is a brand designed by surfers, for surfers. In 1973, Billabong offered little more than a small range of surf wear: mainly surfboards and board shorts. But today, Billabong is a brand that encompasses the Australian surf culture by offering products that cater not only for the surfer inside many of us, but for fashion and lifestyle needs. 1.2 CURRENT TARGET ...
the positive effects of complimentary Factors that Influence the 5 key elements A. Sales Benefits from greater variety a. Product line expansion should be considered when buyers purchase a mix of substitute products and brands over time; mixed brand purchases mean multiple needs due to differences across segments. b. Product line extensions may be necessary to reach buyers who do not normally purchase from the product category.
c. Successful early entrants have a major influence on how attributes are valued by consumers and on their ideal attribute combination d. Late entrants must succeed on differentiation e. Meaningful variety depends on the differentiability of the product line, differentiability increases with: # attributes, range of variation, difficulty in making attribute comparisons. Firms are motivated to expand the product line when greater variety: 1.
allows firms to better meet buyers’ needs for variety 2. more precisely meets the needs of those use substitute categories 3. eliminates major gaps in price-performance offerings 4. helps differentiate the firms product from that of the first mover Fixed costs of Product-Line expansion Traditional it was thought that with more variety less economy of scope and higher inventories. But economies of scope can come from the joint utilization of inputs (ie raw material, expanding product line permits fuller utilization of a fixed factor of production and through networking arrangements, if an input is not consumed in the production process so it can be reused in a second product and from the sharing of intangible skills, activities or know how. For consumer goods, the most SIGNIFICANT economy of scope opportunity with respect to product line expansion is the savings and leveraging of brand equity.
Increased market share from broader product lines can not only outweigh any increased manufacturing and inventory costs, but may even lead to reduced costs. The extent to which economies of scope grow relative to economies of scale, then we anticipate increased product -line development activity. The cannibalization problem: The effects of cannibalization are compounded if the new addition to a line supplants sales from higher margin products (or it could be reverse).
1. How would you characterize the branded and packaged Indian hair care category in 2010? In 2010, with Lotus & Bamboo soap bar was introduced by Mary Kay in India, May Kay was approved a customized product for a specific country or region market for the first time. Moreover, the branded and packaged Indian care category of Mary Kay was growing up and expanding its product to attract more ...
The extent of cannibalization will be greater if: 1. The new product offers measurably better performance at a price similar to existing offerings 2. The new item carries the same brand name: those loyal to a brand are more likely to try a new item carrying that label 3.
the attributes of new and existing products are highly similar 4. the usage content of new and existing products is similar eg may noise light mayo When assortments are expanded for brands that already have high market share, the line extension is hampered by two forces: 1. If the new product involves major new quality level or attribute combination, then the brand’s equity may not be transferred 2. If the new product involves minor variation then the same segment may result in cannibalization Lost Sales from Inaction: 1. New competitive offerings may draw away part of our existing customer base by offering improved or additional benefits 2. Opportunity costs for lost sales growth Defensive strategies: 1.
Pricing 2. Advertising 3. Continual product improvement If new technology is relatively easy to match then a large number of potential entrants reduces the likely prf ots from innovation Just because you have a new product does not mean your customers will not switch. Opportunity costs for inaction are greater when: 1. customer switching costs are low 2. new competing products offer benefits that are valued highly by all segments 3.
competitors posses substantial promotion and distribution resources so they are not easily dislodged from their position The Development Risks of attempting to meet or pre-empt competition are lower when: Our technological approach is likely to meet with customer acceptance There is minimal likelihood that our position will be leapfrogged by new technology Our technology is not easily copied so that it will not be easy for competitors Complentary relationships in line additions: 1. Goods / services that are compliments are those that enhance the customers levels of satisfaction with and the utility of other products 2. are compliments because of search economies the time and efforts savings of purchasing together 3. that enhance the overall image of the seller so that products are valued more highly…
1. Introduction: The retail industry plays a significant role in the development and growth of overall economy of a nation. In countries such as UK, retailers have positioned themselves in such a way that they are able to cater all types of customers’ needs and wants. (Economic Survey, 2012). The major retailers of UK are Tesco, Sainsburys, Asda, John Lewis, Marks and Spencer etc. Even when the ...
The immediate complimentary effect is likely to be greatest in the case where the new product enhances the desirability of a specific existing complimentary product to non-buyers. (addition of sensor from electric people will use foamy cream now) IMPLICATIONS for PRODUCT LINE STRATEGY Assortment additions: cherry coke Derivative Models: new models for slightly different functional needs Classic improvements: greater quality offered Quality level expansions: Lexus Major reformulations: Stain master carpets New SubCategories: major innovations that create new usage opportunities.