In the beginning, “The Bungalow craze did not arise in a cultural vacuum, but was one expression of a boarder artistic movement at the turn of the century known as Arts and Crafts” (110).
In the nineteenth century, the Progressive reform era promoted simple architectural styles. As the era progressed society changed living styles. But did they keep them conservative or radical? “The Bungalow’s appeal was also related to dramatic changes overtaking women in late nineteenth century” (111).
The supporters of the Bungalow style of architecture were radical because of the progression or era, and simplicity that proceeded throughout society.
Progression concerns how well we appreciate artifact and intend to uphold everything or architecture. In other words, keeping it nice and conservative. Gustav Stickley explains why tradition was not good enough, “To preserve these characteristics and to bring back to individuals life and work the vigorous constructive spirit which during the last half-century has spent its activities in commercial and industrial expansion, is, in a nut-shell, the Craftsmen idea” (123).
Tradition was not good enough. People in twentieth all had reputations to uphold. Stickley claims, “That the influence of the home is of the first importance in the shaping of character is a fact too well understood and too generally admitted to be offered here as a new” (123).
The Essay on Bungalows Bungalow House Style
Bungalows In the 20's the most common style house design was the Bungalow, it is ideal for the average Australian house because it has a basic style, instead of the usual complicated designs of the federation period. The bungalows brought simplicity to the average suburban home, no longer were the walls painted elaborate colours, they were stained, and plaster surfaces were painted white or pale ...
They needed to straighten out their standards and change their furniture and architectural home design.
Before the era had progressed, traditional home designs were very simple, but also too much. Because people held on to there traditions they could have been considered hoarders. Stickleys suggests, “We need to straighten out our standards and to get rid of a lot of rubbish that we have accumulated along with our wealth and commercial supremacy” (123).
Again he explains, “Therefore we regard it as at least a step in the direction of bringing about better conditions when we try to plan and build houses which will simplify the work of home life and add to its wholesome joy and comfort” (124).
In conclusion, because of times changing we are always influenced to have the new things and be up to date. “The Bungalow reflected the influence of a progressive ideology characterized by a belief in efficiency, faith in the power of the environment to transform people, and a distrust of concentrated wealth, class divisions, and busting, house reform” (134).
The supporters supported the drastic changes because they were influenced by the society.
