In the novel Crime and Punishment, some of the most significant events are mental or psychological, for example; awakenings, discoveries, changes in consciousness. In this essay, I will describe how the author manages to give these internal events the sense of excitement, suspense, and climax usually associated with external action.
In the novel, Raskolnikov conceives of himself as being an “extraordinary man”, and then formulates a theory whereby an extraordinary man has the right to commit any crime. Raskolnikov’s theory goes as follows. All men are divided into two categories. “Ordinary” and “extraordinary.” While the “extraordinary” man has the right to commit any crime and to transgress the law in any way, the “ordinary” man has to live in submission and has no right to transgress the law. The justification for these “extraordinary” men to have the right to transgress the law is because if they are not held to a greater standard, they will cease to be great. To be great means that one is able to break free from common laws. The most obvious example of when Raskolnikov applies his theory to the world is when he commits the two murders. Raskolnikov feels this is an acceptable thing for him to do because he is an “extraordinary” man.
Another time in the novel when Raskolnikov’s subconscious event is climactic is in his dreams. In one dream, Raskolnikov is in his childhood and he is walking with his father. He sees a peasant trying to make a horse pull a wagon, but the horse will not move. His father then begins to laugh at the man because he finds the situation of the peasant trying to make a horse move humorous. The peasant then begins to severely beat the horse, so severely that the horse dies. Raskolnikov then, feeling great compassion for the now dead horse, falls to the ground and begins hugging and kissing it. The dreams Raskolnikov has in the novel are usually symbolic in some way. This dream is symbolic because it is disturbing for Raskolnikov to see the horse beaten to death, and then in turn makes him wonder if he can kill the pawnbroker as he has planned. This brings out a much different side of Raskolnikov that is one of compassion and mercy. It seems that Raskolnikov has a dual personality. The two different sides of his personality are shown based on the situation he is in during his daily life. When something happens that makes him think of hate or dissatisfaction, such as his first experience at the pawnshop, his personality reflects those actions and he is a disturbed, murderous man. When the situation in his daily life is one of caring or compassion, he is a good and positive man who can care about others. An example of this is when Marmeladov is killed, and Raskolnikov carries him home and gives all of his money to Marmeladov’s family, even though Raskolnikov needs the money himself to pay his rent.
The Essay on Does Breaking a Law Makes a Criminal?
To judge whether breaking a law makes a criminal, first we must define the terms law and crime. Every society makes and enforces laws that govern the conduct of the individuals. Without law we cannot live. Laws maximizes our individual right, facilitate the orders of our society, and it keeps peace in our civilization. The violation of those duties that he or she owes to society and for the breach ...
In conclusion, not only are Raskolnikov’s thoughts an important aspect of the novel, but arguably his thoughts are the most important part of the novel because it is in his thoughts that he does the some of the most important things like formulate his “superman” theory, plans out the murders, and he then questions his own motives and doesn’t know if he can actually carry them out.
