R, 2, 7, 3. Is justice for all possible? Justice is the abstract philosophical concept that connotes fair distribution of societys benefits and burdens among the members of the society. Once again one has to remember that there is no absolute justice in the world and the society, and its economic system each influence the principles of justice in the given society. Therefore, based on philosophical abstraction I can state that there can be no long-term justice for all, while the short term justice for all groups and strata in the society are possible. Based on the egalitarian principle of justice all benefits and burdens in the society should be distributed equally among the society members. This can technically be achieved by providing equal wages to all nuclear engineers, body guards, McDonalds waiters, and high school teachers (Thompson, 34).
On one hand this may appear fair and just to all society members yet on the other hand equality may reduce the motivation in people to take risky jobs that because of the equal pay would appear unattractive to the job-seekers.
People would stick to riskless jobs and would completely abandon the education that would not provide any monetary incentive in the society where every one would be paid similarly (Creek, 92).
Based on the Socialist principle of justice the benefits and burdens should be distributed based on the principle from each according to ones ability to each according to ones needs. This was the principle used in communist Russia (Soviet Union).
The Essay on Situations In Which Injustice Justice Society Interests
What Justice Can there be justice for all To answer this question I must first define what justice is. Justice is "the quality of being just, impartial or fair" in your dealings with others according to Merriam Webster's Collegiate Dictionary. Keeping that definition in mind, I now must turn to the Voices of Wisdom in order to find an example of a situation in which all parties feel that they are ...
Based on this principle, people should voluntary contribute as much as they could to the benefits of the society while expecting to receive everything according to their needs (Thompson, 37).
I should note that from the logical point of view this system appears rather egalitarian as well, while focusing more on the better workers contribution while distributing the benefits among the other society members. In other words, this system could only work when people are voluntarily are willing to contribute their best efforts at work, while also being able to precisely express their needs to receive the benefits (Creek, 95).
As a result the education should also become unnecessary because the years spent in school (that do not guarantee future best efforts) could be spent on the field planting potatoes-or do other things that measure best efforts (Thompson, 39).
To the best of my knowledge this principle of justice indeed worked in the USSR for a short period of time, providing justice for all.
Still, I should note that the Soviet Economy based on the Socialist principle of justice indeed did not work for a long period of time and the efficiency was much lower than that in the developed capitalist economies (Doberman, 284).
Based on the principles of capitalist justice the benefits and burdens should be distributed based on the principle from each according to his / her investment. This principle of justice states that the rich people should receive the greatest amount of benefits, as well as those who contribute the best/ largest amount of other investment (labor, financial or knowledge) to receive the largest benefits in the society. Therefore, this principle of justice is directly correlated with the personal or inherited input in the society to receive the best benefits. The injustice associated with the given principle of justice is that those unprivileged groups of people who do not possess the investment are not expected to receive any benefits from the society that lives according to the capitalist principles of justice (Thompson, 37).
The Essay on Importance Of Justice In A Society
The Importance of Justice in Society English: 250 Instructor: Dr. P. B. Mid delton. Author: Al-Has sar, Abdullah. One component of the definition of justice is the final outcome of the process of the law, whereby justice is distributed by the State. According to this definition, justice is the mechanical process of the structure of law - set in place and agreed to by the people of the State. ...
The blacks, latinos or immigrants that come to the capitalist country in search of a new life-are doomed to work for the initial accumulation of capital and only then are expected to receive the benefits the society has to offer (Perelman, 132).
In conclusion I would like to say that because there are at least three types of justices as expressed above one cannot objectively state whether or not the justice can be achieved for a long period of time for all.
In the Soviet Union the socialist justice was present for all, thus making everyone work to the best of their efforts while receiving only to their needs (not wants or whims!).
Yet the period of the existence of the Soviet Union was less than 80 years, thus making us think that maybe once the justice is achieved the society cannot exist. Therefore, I believe that to achieve justice for all a society has to create something perfect. Yet because humans that create this justice are not perfect, thus the creation of justice for all is impossible, or the created justice is not true justice for all. The capitalist justice is currently trying to employ the egalitarian elements of justice with the government creating safety nets for unemployed, unprivileged, minorities or physically disabled. Yet still the justice according to the true capitalist or egalitarian principles is not achieved anywhere and that in my opinion contributes to the creation of the efficiencies and innovations that various interest groups strive to create to assure justice for themselves (not for all) if not for a long than at least for a short term period.
Bibliography:
Thompson, Mark, Business Ethics, McGraw hill, 2002. Creek, Diana, The Principles of justice, Prentice hall, 2001.
Perelman, Andrew, Is there one justice?, Oxford University Press, 2002. Doberman, Ryan, The Ethics reviewed. Penguin Books, 2001..
