Resistance to change has been renowned as an organizational challenge; however, a comprehensive understanding of the different ways that resistance can be manifested is commonly practiced and highly beneficial to companies. A U. S. mining company, Ajax Minerals realized just how beneficial it is to understand the components of how changes affect all branches of their company. Ajax Minerals recognized their organization was operating at full capacity and in the next couple years were going to have major competitive threats from another company.
If the matters of the future challenges that Ajax Minerals were anticipating weren’t addressed and handled appropriately, the organization would be expecting to experience grave danger. What it all boils down to are the issues concerning how Ajax Mineral organization would react regarding resistance of changes that would ensure competitiveness and livelihood for the company. If this subject matter about how employees and management adapt to change weren’t predicted and then addressed, Ajax Minerals future looked bleak.
Ajax Minerals introduced a couple of sources relative to ensure the lively-hood and growth for the company by addressing the situations that come along with changes being made. Ajax Minerals concerned about the company’s future; not wanting to lose business and perhaps go under, took a close look into aspects concerning resistance to change and how going through this metamorphism will affect their employees, supervisors, and management. Recognition of how employees and management react to change is an essential step in the development and implementation of effective, targeted change.
The Research paper on Ajax Minerals And Perriers Change Manage
... As global change forces organizations to change, many of them are subject to experience those resistance and failures. Ajax Minerals and Perrier are two companies that ... productivity and performance (Palmer et al. 2009, pg180). Ajax realized this and was concerned in listening to the demands of the staff ...
Reason for why there is resistance to change, whether being positive or negative, is because people seek stability and the fear of the unknown. Past experiences with change resulted in revealing that employees and supervisors only do enough work to just get by or produce minimum compliance. The leadership team of Ajax Minerals decided to approach undergoing the necessary and much needed changes by incorporating the knowledge they had on the matter at hand. One source of resistance to change that Ajax Minerals decided to implement, was by establishing an interactive meeting involving both supervisors and managers.
Another source of resistance to change they decided to implement was adopting an “open-book” approach in which employees were given unprecedented access to data on Ajax’s financial performance (McGraw-Hill 2009).
One thing that can be noted is management may not agree with the changes because of the unfamiliarity and lack of knowledge based on the real issues. “Managers, at least as much as any other category of employee, are likely to have within their ranks a range of opinions as to whether a proposed change is a good idea.
