Not one event can be said to cause a revolution, and many factors will accumulate to create the event of revolution. It cannot be accurately stated that the war with Germany was the only reason for revolution, and the destruction of the Romanov dynasty. World War I greatly affected on Russia’s economy, industry, agriculture, and transport, and in turn inflamed the populous and their opinion of their tsar, Nicholas II, plunged, however, the effects of war made the tsarism vulnerable. In 1913, Russian tsarism had survived three hundred years. Before 1917, and the abdication of Nicholas II, Russian tsarism was “virtually indestructible”, as Pipes interpreted from Russian and foreign press at the time, “for had not tsarism weathered all onslaughts and all crises, and emerged from them intact?” Pipes accuracy is questionable, as public outcry against the tsar was apparent, if only in the presence of political groups calling for the end of the monarchy. The rapid growth associated with industrialisation created a dense concentration of working-class proletariat, with poor living conditions, close to the ruling centre of the empire.
Because of this dense geographic concentration, the newly created and despondent proletariat possessed a great political strength, affiliating themselves with many radical and violent political parties, from the Socialist Revolutionary Party to the Liberal Constitutional-Democratic party. These parties were pushing for change and were backed by the popular discontent in both cities and regional areas. Tsar Nicholas refused to make use of the duma for political reform, the fourth Duma (1912-1916) being the most conservative, yet in November 1916, it gave Nicholas clear warning of impending revolution, if there remained no changes in the Russian regime. Nicholas refused to include the new emerging middle class Russia into the political system, which remained without the fundamental changes needed to secure the new and evolving society. Government remained unable to cope with the demands and the weakness and indecisiveness of tsar Nicholas II exacerbated the problems society was facing. Nicholas himself had become an “endemic weaknesses of the tsarist state” The death of five hundred Russian citizens on Bloody Sunday, January 22 1905, was a “death blow to the ancient legendary belief that tsar and the people were one.” Tsarism would continue to weather crisis after crisis, but the rift between societies groups would grow, until war became the crucial catalyst, and ultimately, the trigger for the fall of tsarist Russia.
The Term Paper on The Russian Revolution Of 1905 Was In Fact No Revolution At All
The revolution of 1905, in Russia, was not a complete revolution at all. To be able to respond to this statement accurately, it is firstly advisable, to look at what a revolution is. It is then best to observe what the Russian society was like before 1905, during 1905 and after 1905, to establish whether or not, a complete revolution had in fact taken place in the so called revolution of 1905. To ...
Ill prepared and cut off from its allies in the west, the country suffered serious reverses in the war at the hands of the Germans and Austrians. Inflation, food shortages and poor moral among the troops contributed to the outbreak of the February Revolution of 1917. War meant that the Cossacks that were left to quell any anti-tsar uprising were usually un-seasoned soldiers, and closer to their fellow people. Pre-1914 the Cossacks were able to receive orders from their tsar and carried them out by the use of force. With the outbreak of war, immense numbers of troops were sent to the front, leaving the inexperienced to deal with the troubles brewing at home. The troops were as discontented as the people they were trying to repress, and in refusing to fire on their own kind, were contributing to the removal of tsar Nicholas’ autocratic powers.
Repression and corruption in the government continued, and the country’s problems were exacerbated by the petty feuds that increasingly divided it. In the last 12 months of Nicholas’s rule there were four different prime ministers, three war ministers, and three foreign ministers. Discontent was continuously rehashed, and the Tsar was held directly responsible after assuming control of the army on the front, removing the people’s faith in their leader. The Russian people suffered under inflation, with the cost of living rising while wages fell. Blame was placed on the man that led the nation, tsar Nicholas II.
The Essay on The Depression Great Families People
The Great Depression began in October 1929, when the stock market in the United States dropped rapidly. Thousands of investors lost large sums of money and many were wiped out, lost everything. The crash led us into the Great Depression. This period was the longest and worst period of high unemployment and low business activity, people went along with only the bear necessities, and the families ...
Nicholas had, in 1904, pledged himself to improve the conditions of the population, but this promise was renounced not long after. In 1912 the tsar refused to answer pleas to abandon the war efforts, and sent more and more troops to the front, vying for victory. Pleas continued at home but Nicholas seemed indifferent to their needs. “It began when silent, long suffering bread ques suddenly erupted and people began breaking into bakeries. Workers, whose factories have closed for lack of coal, went on strike. Crowds took part in street demonstrations, banners saying ‘down with the German woman’ and ‘down with the war’ ” Marxists believe that all history is the history of class war, that all historical events are determined by social conflict.
For a Marxist historians view, many events must be ignored or manipulated for history to fit into their explanation of proceedings. They are able to predict the events of revolution only with the benefit of hindsight and manipulation. Nicholas was not the only member of the royal family under scrutiny. Tsarina Alexandra was distrusted as she was German and Rasputin was disliked.
Personal abuse became the weapon of propaganda against the imperial family and the so-called affair between her and the infamous Rasputin. .”.. And their relationship, while merely scandalous in peacetime, became a positive threat to the regime when it came under the stress of full-scale modern war” Shukman is stating obviously that even this humiliation would not cause the fall of the dynasty, and it was only in conjunction with war that forced the abdication of Nicholas and the fall of the Romanov dynasty. Rasputin was rumoured to have become the chief influence in the empire, controlling even military decisions.
By 1916 he was murdered, but not before the royal family became shamed. “Placing a wild and unpredictable wanderer from Siberia into the bosom of the royal family was to create a potential danger to the standing and image of the Romanov dynasty” Pipes only mentions Alexandria fleetingly ” and, as misfortune would want it, the wife of the tsar was German – a very patriotic lady, devoted to Russia, but nevertheless widely believed to be a spy who betrayed to her native land the military secrets of her acquired homeland” he seems indifferent to the part that the tsars wife may have played with her scandalous behaviour in the downfall of the Romanov dynasty Nicholas claimed to be an autocrat but his indecisive nature caused an unwillingness to delegate power and complete policies. His vacillating disposition forced the monarchy into disrepute, with no one willing to defend the family. The control his wife had over him was disgraceful, and “a good minister in Alexandra’s view was one who met with Rasputin approval and had no mind of his own.” Further naming her regent in 1915, while he himself took control of the armies at the front was disastrous. By personally taking responsibility for the Russian army’s loss, Nicholas gave the people reason to be angry and instead of blaming a general or far-distant royal relative, the head of the state was forced public interest, exacerbated by political uproar, manipulative propaganda mass unpopularity. In 1915 alone there was 2 million casualties The outbreak of World War I in 1914 put a temporary halt to the revolutionary activities of the radicals, creating a sense of national pride and unity, against a common enemy.
The Term Paper on Russian System Russia War Government
"Nothing short of war could have any impact of the Russian system of government." How accurate is this of the Tsarist system of government from 1800-1917. The Russian Tsarist system under the Romanov's was extremely resistant to change in all forms. Reforms were brought in only to preserve and little improvement resulted from these reforms. In this essay I will attempt to examine whether or not ...
But by the end of 1914 severe losses had been inflicted on the Russian army, the defeats began to assume the proportions of the Crimean and Japanese disasters. With 5. 5 million casualties throughout the war, increasing problems continuously faced Russia. Lack of supplies and transport, and the inefficiency of military leaders, further demoralized the troops. There was an inadequate transport system, placing pressure on manufacture and supply. Factories could not get raw materials, and in turn, people could not get food.
The war became unpopular throughout Russia. War brought pressure to an already struggling structure, and many events accumulated to break the old regime of Russia. The reasons for the demise of Russian tsarism were run much deeper than war; it was an accumulation of events that gradually built up to be toppled by war. It was not only the event of war that brought the monarchy of Russia to its knees, but an accretion of defamatory events forced the revolutionary change, and the fall of tsarism. Microsoft (R) Encarta (R) Encyclopaedia 2003 (c) 1993-2002 Microsoft Corporation. The Russian Revolution, H.
The Term Paper on Timelines Of The Great War And Russian Revolution Worksheet
... II and his family are executed| Yekaterinburg, Russia| During the Russian Civil War, the Bolsheviks decide they cannot risk losing the ... and London| Military timetables dictate events, and the mobilizations in Germany and Russia make war inevitable. German troops streaming toward France ... beneath it. 1914 Timeline June 28, 1914| The event that triggered World War I| Sarajevo| The heir to the Austro- ...
Shukman, Sutton publishing 1998 Three Whys of the Russian Revolution. Richard Pipes. Pimlico, London, 1995. Chronicle of the 20 th Century.
J. Ross, Viking, Australasia, 1999.
