Shakespeare and Similarity of Gender Roles #2 Shakespeare, although historically gender biased, can be charged with giving both males and females similar characteristic traits within his plays. This can best be proven using the comparison of Portia from the “Merchant of Venice” to King Henry from “Henry V.” These two characters, barring gender, show common traits throughout both of these plays. They are also set into similar situations, such as marital issues, prank playing, and the use of disguises. As audiences are introduced to each of these characters, they are shown both their wealth and intelligence. In “Henry V”, the audience is quickly given King Henry’s “free-spirited” background, but then is told of his miraculous change in demeanor after his father’s death. The Bishop of Canterbury explains it as “But that his wildness, mortified in him, /Seemed to die too; yea, at that very moment/ Consideration like an angel came/ And whipped th ” offending Adam out of him, / Leaving his body as a paradise/…
Never was such a sudden scholar made” (1. 1 27-33).
Portia’s intelligence is explained best by the literary critic Mrs. [Anna Brownell] Jameson when she states that Portia is “distinguished by her mental superiority. [In Portia] intellect is kindled into romance by a poetical imagination” (38-39).
Portia’s sense of humor and spirited ness makes itself known almost immediately when she is first introduced in “The Merchant of Venice” with her waiting woman, Nerissa. In this speech, which concerns the terms of her future marriage according to her deceased fathers’ will, Portia artfully and impertinently describes the suitors who have vied for her hand thus far (1. 2).
The Essay on Gender Roles In Shakespeare
It is a peculiar feature of Shakespeare's plays that they both participate in and reflect the ideas of gender roles in Western society. To the extent that they reflect existing notions about the 'proper' roles of men and women, they can be said to be a product of their society. However, since they have been studied, performed, and taught for five hundred years, they may be seen as formative of ...
Forced marriage is a common bond that Portia shares with King Henry.
According to her deceased fathers’ wishes, Portia must marry the man who chooses the correct casket from a choice of three. She has no say in the matter. Henry, also, has no say in whom he must marry. As King, he must cement England’s bonds with France, and thus make his marriage to Katharine a condition of Frances’s ur render. Portia, happily, ends up marrying the gentleman that she wishes. Henry decides to “woo” the Lady Katharine, supposedly falling in love with her.
According to Desmond Seward, ” The King… was enchanted by the girl. He regarded her as the only possible bride for him, if contemporaries are to be believed” (130-131).
A strong parallel that Shakespeare creates between these two characters is their use of disguises. While their reasons for adopting their individual disguises are different (Portia to help another; King Henry to ultimately help himself), they both find it necessary to accomplish their goals. Portia, because of her strong love for her husband Bassanio, disguises herself as a “young civil doctor of Rome.” In this guise, she successfully defends Bassanio’s best friend, Antonio, in court against Shylock.
Although William Hazlitt stated that Portia has a “certain degree of affectation and pedantry” about her, he felt that she “undertook and executed the role quite successfully” (168).
King Henry, the night before the Battle of Agincourt, disguises himself as a common soldier in order to move among his men undetected. It is his desire to learn his men’s thoughts and feelings about “the great battle in which they have been swept up” that leads to his use of a disguise. Upon later reflection, he finds that he is “troubled by the weight of kingly responsibility” and laments the “lonely isolation of power.” Ironically, the only consolation Henry can find in being king is the pomp and ceremony, and elaborate costuming (Quennell 124).
The Essay on Was King Henry VIII A Good Or A Bad King?
“His majesty is 29 years old and is very handsome.” How the Venetian Ambassador described Henry between 1515-1519. “A youngster who cares for nothing but girls and wasting the money his father left.” How the French Ambassador described Henry between 1509-1511. The French Ambassador’s answer is not surprising as he and Henry were enemies and later they went to war. ...
While in disguise, both of our characters can yet again be found in similar situations. Mischievously, they both decide to play pranks on those around them. In the guise of the “civil doctor”, Portia demands from her husband, Bassanio, the ring she had given him upon their marriage as payment for saving Antonio’s life. Although Bassanio has sworn to Portia that he would never part with the ring, he ultimately agrees and hands it over to his disguised wife as payment. The audience is assured that Portia does this as a lighthearted prank, and not out of spitefulness, when she confides to Nerissa that “we shall have old swearing/ That they did give the rings away to men; / But we ” ll outface them, and out swear them too. -” (4.
2 15-17).
King Henry, while dressed as a commoner, hears from three soldiers that they doubt the motives and courage of the king. Upon defending ‘himself”, Henry becomes embroiled in a quarrel with a soldier known as Michael Williams. When Williams will not back down, Henry exchanges gloves, and agrees to fight him if they both live through the battle (4.
1).
Later, after the battle, the king furthers his prank when he asks Fluellen, one of his officers, to wear the glove in his stead, and apprehend anyone that challenges said glove (4. 7).
When Williams ultimately challenges Fluellen, he is taken directly to the King.
After explaining to the King that he feels the dispute was not his fault because he did not know who he was speaking to, the King fills the glove with gold, saying “Keep it, fellow, / And wear it for an honor in they cap/ Till I do challenge it” (4. 8 58-60).
One last, but important trait that both of these characters have in common is their rhetorical skill. As David Bevington comments, “Skill in rhetoric is a key to Henry’s success – in defying the French Dauphin, in preparing troops for battle, or in wooing the French princess for his queen” (413).
Shakespeare even has the Bishop of Canterbury comment approvingly on Henry’s skill when he declares that Henry can “reason in divinity,”debate of commonwealth affairs,”discourse of war,” handle “any cause of policy,” and in all such matters speak in “sweet and honeyed sentences” (1. 1 39-51).
The Essay on The Death of Cordelia in William Shkespeares King Lear
The Death of Cordelia in William Shakespeare's King Lear King Lear is a tragedy unlike any other written by William Shakespeare. It focuses on the psychological downfall of a powerful King. It proves that as long as a nation has a king on the throne all is well, but as soon as a king steps off the throne nothing but chaos transpires. The downfall of the king results in the downfall of the ...
Portia’s rhetorical skill is best demonstrated by her speeches during the trial. Mrs. [Anna Brownell] Jameson stated “the wit of Portia is like attar of roses, rich and concentrated.” Mrs. Jameson, during an in-depth essay of Portia’s character, referred to Portia’s speeches as “matchless pieces of eloquence” and went on to say that “the suspense in which she keeps the whole court…
verges upon agony (43).
Even William Hazlitt, who stated that “Portia is not a very great favourite with us”, continued on to say “The whole of the trial-scene, is a master-piece of dramatic skill. The legal acuteness, the passionate declamations, the sound maxims of jurisprudence, the wit and irony interspersed in it… cannot be surpassed” (166).
In conclusion, one cannot help but see that Shakespeare has treated the character of Portia in a similar manner as the character of Henry V. This, considering the year that these plays were written, is an important factor to contemplate.
He has given each of these characters many common traits, and has placed them in more than one similar situation. Whether it is marital issues, prank playing, or the use of disguise, one must acknowledge the similarities that he has chosen to give them. Works CitedBevington, David. The Necessary Shakespeare. 2 nd. Ed.
New York: Pearson/Longman, 2005. Hazlitt, William. “The Merchant of Venice.” Characters of Shakespeare’s Plays & Lectures on the English Poets. The Macmillan Company: 1903. Jameson, Mrs. [Anna Brownell], Shakespeare’s Heroines: Characteristics of Women, Moral, Poetical, & Historical.
2 nd Ed. George News, Limited. 1897. Quennell, Peter, and Hamish Johnson. Who’s Who in Shakespeare.
New York: William Morrow & Co. Inc. , 1973. Seward, Desmond. Henry V as Warlord.
London: Sedgwick & Jackson, 1987. Shakespeare, William. “The Merchant of Venice.” The Necessary Shakespeare. 2 nd Ed. David Bevington. New York: Pearson/Longman, 2005.
— -. “Henry V.” The Necessary Shakespeare. 2 nd Ed. David Bevington.
The Term Paper on William Henry Gates Iii
William Henry Gates III Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Microsoft Corporatio William (Bill) H. Gates is chairman and chief executive officer of Microsoft Corporation, the leading provider, worldwide, of software for the personal computer. Microsoft had revenues of $8. 6 billion for the fiscal year ending June 1996, and employs more than 20, 000 people in 48 countries. Background on Bill Born ...
New York: Pearson/Longman, 2005.
