Elizabeth Elizabeth I: Cate Blanchett Sir Francis Walsingham: Geoffrey Rush Duke of Norfolk: Christopher Eccleston Robert Dudley, Earl of Leicester: Joseph Fiennes Sir William Cecil: Richard Attenborough Mary of Guise: Fanny ArdantThe Pope: John Gielgud Directed by Shekhar Kapur. Written by Michael Hirst. Running time: 124 minutes. Rated R (for violence and sexuality).
BY ROGER EBERT The England of the first Elizabeth is a dark and sensuous place; the court lives intimately with treachery, and cloaks itself in shadows and rude luxury. As seen through the fresh eyes of an Indian director, Shekhar Kapur, “Elizabeth” is not a light “Masterpiece Theater” production, but one steeped in rich, saturated colors and emotions. The texture of the film is enough to recommend it, even apart from the story. Cate Blanchett stars as Elizabeth I, who in 1558, at the age of 25, took the throne of a Catholic country, declared it Protestant, fought off assassination by the French, the Spanish, her rivals and the pope, and ruled for 45 years. She succeeded, the film demonstrates, by learning on the job, growing from a na ” ive girl to a willful strategist who picked her advisers well and ignored them when they urgently advised her to marry: “I will have one mistress here! And no master!” She was known as the Virgin Queen. Virginity for her, as for so many, was something she grew into.
As the film opens, she frolics with her lover, Robert Dudley (Joseph Fiennes), and her ardor only subsides as she realizes no man loves the Queen of England only for herself. She is contemptuous of such other suitors as the Duke of Anjou (Vincent Cassel), who sees marriage as a social move, and is surprised while frolicking in a frock. And her eyes narrow as she listens to proposals couriered in by various rulers who want to marry her as a sort of mergers and acquisitions deal. The screenplay provides a series of hard-edged conversations in which Elizabeth’s enemies conspire against her, and her friends urgently counsel her while she teaches herself to tell true allies from false ones. She is much helped in the beginning by white-bearded old Sir William Cecil (Richard Attenborough), although there comes a time when he must be put to pasture, and Attenborough’s character accepts this news with humility that is truly touching. Then the lurking, sinister Sir Francis Walsingham (Geoffrey Rush) moves to her side and brilliantly helps guide her to triumph.
The Term Paper on Sir Hugo Film Spider One
Adventures in motion pictures The writer of prose fiction, when he first turns his hand to screenwriting, often does so with a condescending air. Surely this can't be so very difficult, he thinks; all that's required is to come up with the bare bones of a story. So he goes to work anticipating a quick job with easy money at the end of it, and possibly a bit of glory. He is soon disabused of these ...
He’s instrumental to the plot, even though his role is at first murky. After Elizabeth’s archrival Mary of Guise (Fanny Ardent) sends her a poisoned dress that luckily claims the life of another, it is Sir Francis who adroitly convinces Mary he will betray Elizabeth. Francis and Mary spend a night together, and in the morning, Mary is dead. It didn’t happen like that in history, but it should have.
The movie, indeed, compresses and rewrites history at its own convenience, which is the rule anyway with English historical romances. What it gets right is the performance by Cate Blanchett, who was so good as the poker-playing glass manufacturer in “Oscar and Lucinda” (1997) and here uncannily comes to resemble the great monarch. She is saucy and heedless at first, headstrong when she shouldn’t be, but smart, and able to learn. By the end she has outsmarted everyone and become one of the rare early female heads of state to rule successfully without an alliance with a man. Shekhar Kapur, who directed “The Bandit Queen” (1995) about a fierce modern Indian Robin Hood, here clothes Elizabeth, her court and her architecture in the colors and texture of medieval India. The film is largely set in vast, echoing halls, their pillars reaching up into the shadows.
He is attentive to the rustle of dresses and the clank of armor, gives us a barge on the Thames like a houseboat on a lake in Kashmir. Action is glimpsed through iron filigree screens, dresses are rich with embroidery, hairstyles are ornately elaborated, and yet there is the feeling that just out of sight of these riches are the rats in the kitchen and the slop-pots in the halls. This is not the Ye Olde approach, but a society still inventing gentility; sex is so linked with politics that old Sir William demands to inspect Elizabeth’s sheets every morning, to keep tabs on possibly alarming developments in her private life. At the end of the film, Elizabeth announces, “I have become a virgin.” And so she remained, ruling over and in some sense creating the England that gave us Shakespeare. Think what a play he might have written about her, if commoners had been allowed to create characters out of reigning monarchs. No doubt he retired in sheer frustration.
The Term Paper on Elizabeth Mary Movie Dudley
... film shows Elizabeth cutting off her long hair, painting herself white, and reluctantly becoming a "Virgin Queen," and "marrying England." This decision ... mother, badly. To avoid angering Mary, Elizabeth "conformed outwardly to Catholicism," ... film also shows that although Elizabeth was overall a successful ruler, she did have some drawbacks. After her first meetings with Parliament, Elizabeth questions ...
copyright @ The Sun-Times Company Question 1: This film depicts the political and social turmoil during the English Reformation, a reformation which eventually made England Protestant. Briefly describe Queen Mary’s position at the beginning of the film. What was her attitude toward her half-sister Elizabeth? What did you make of her strange behavior? What was your reaction to the terrible persecutions Mary set forth in order to keep England Catholic? Can you think of any modern examples of religious persecution? Question 2: Briefly describe Elizabeth’s decision to make England Protestant. What do you think were the motives behind her decision? (think about the scene where Elizabeth wins her way by locking up the dissenting “Catholic” bishops! ) Do you think her decision to make England Protestant was more a political decision, or did it come from some deep religious motive like Luther’s? What does this tell you about the relation of church and state at this time? Did the concept of religious freedom have meaning during Elizabeth’s era? Question 3: At the end of the film – and the terrible retributions Elizabeth set forth on her enemies – she looks at a statue of Mary, the Mother of Jesus, and asks, “what do I do now?” Walsingham replies, “all men need something bigger than themselves to look up to and worship.” What was the meaning of this conversation? Do you think Elizabeth sees herself as replacing Mary in the hearts of her people? Elaborate. Question 4: What was your overall reaction to this film? Be honest. exactly.
The Essay on Elizabeth England Queen Mary
In 1554, Queen Mary I attempted to restore Catholicism as a single faith in England. Under Mary's reign, Protestants were either executed or they fled abroad. Despite the fact that Elizabeth had supported Mary's accession and attended Catholic services, Mary believed Elizabeth was leading Protestant conspiracies to take the power. Before her death, Mary tried to convince Elizabeth to defend the ...
