Should the law treat kids and adults differently?
Before Victorian times there were no age district for young offenders and all who got in trouble with the law were send to adult prisons. In our days crime is everywhere, children and young people are constantly making crimes starting from drugs and gangs all the way to murder. For most children and young people, getting into trouble is part of the normal business of growing up, testing the boundaries and finding one’s place in the world. We always hear that people know right from wrong, minor or not. However, couldn’t young offenders still have time to learn the error of their ways and become productive members of society? Should we kill all source of hope, all second chances, and banish our youths to lifetime imprisonment with no turning back? After all, a child has no rights in our society, should he be punished the same way a responsible adult would? Or, should law treat kids and adults differently?
All of it depends on many, many circumstances. However, children do not go to bed as a child and wake up as an adult. Their frontal temporal lobes, the think tank, does not begin to completely develop until the late teens, early twenties; depending on male and female development. Therefore, the 14-year-old does not have the level of maturity, thought process, decision-making, experience, or wisdom that a 24-year-old presumably has, because mentally, children cannot make decisions as well as adults. One of the best way to distinguish the maturity of a child is within his purpose to commit actions. An 11 years old child, like Jordan Brown, could quite easily be pushed by jealousy, and commit murder. However jealousy is childish, we have all been confronted to it earlier in our lives: whether a classmate had better marks, was more popular, whether a father had replaced a loved mother with a new enemy wife. There is reason for us to consider children differently than adults. There is a reason for society to consider children like adults only from the age of 18. There is a reason for us to let our children grow up into responsible and mature adults. In fact, before the age of 18, a child is under his parents’ responsibility. It is of their duty to educate a future, serious adult.
The Essay on Understand Children And Young Persons Development
The instant comfort from their mother or fathers smell or sounds they are aware of who is who already. Babies know how to communicate right from the time of birth through crying. Crying is often due to hunger, tired, dirty soiled nappy or illness. Skin to skin when born is known to help the bond between a mother and baby. Also close contact with parents and baby during caring times Eg Feeding, ...
Education as well as background is another issue. There are many reasons why children and young persons start committing crimes: violence at home, money problems, boredom, learning problems, availability of alcohol and drugs, poor housing… As you might notice, a terrible amount of these reasons are directly linked with the parents’ responsibility. A child who has been brought to become unstable because of a lack of attention or else, can quickly be vulnerable. We must consider the parenting when it comes to sentence young children. Of course, a child who has been guilty of a second-degree murder does not immediately appeal as innocent as any other children of his age. However, it is convenient to note that all of us were born neutral, and it is society who has formed each one of us to become what we are. I believe that if society has brought us to be educated by two people, our parents, they have a huge part of responsibility regarding us. Therefore, justice should not immediately destroy the innocent image of a young vulnerable child, and look back at the people who have introduced him to life; after all, they are the true adults! And in some case it is these same “responsible adults”, who provide their children with guns, pushing them towards violence. We sometimes hear that we learn from our mistakes. Can young murderers learn from theirs?
The Essay on Should Children Be Tried as Adults
There is a saying “If you do the crime, you must do the time”. But does that apply to children. Should children be tried as adults?. While some people praise this as a means of stopping young offenders before they start on a “career” of crime, others find it very inappropriate and unjust. This paper will examine questions, pros and cons of whether children should be tried as adults. Discussion I ...
I believe the community understands, or should understand, that the younger a person is, the more likely it is that they can change. The problem is that we’re taking 14 year-olds, 15 year-olds, 16 year-olds, and we are giving up on them. We are throwing away these kids. I have found, in my own experience, that there are salvageable young people who have committed some very horrible kinds of offences, who are able to get their lives together and be productive members of society. I think it is a mistake to just carte blanche give up on these young people just because of the nature of the conduct, when there is so much more that goes into why that person got there at that point in time so young in their lives. What is the right punishment to save these delinquents?
In the United States each year, children as young as 13 are sentenced to spend the rest of their lives in prison without any opportunity for release. Approximately 2,570 children are sentenced to juvenile life without parole. “In the USA, people under 18 years old cannot vote, buy alcohol, lottery tickets or consent to most forms of medical treatment but they can be sentenced to die in prison for their actions. This needs to change,” said Natacha Mension, Campaigner on the USA at Amnesty International. Once more, these words might help up reconsider a lifetime imprisonment without parole for a young child. Simply locking them behind bars is not seen as the best way to rehabilitate them, especially if they are to live with adult murders who have committed the most horrendous crimes, intentionally. However, other issues exist! The juvenile prison system can help children turn their lives around. And rehabilitation gives kids a second chance. Very young children between the ages of 12-16 can be sent to a secure children’s home. Local authorities run these institutions. Young Offenders Institutions are for offenders between the ages of 15 and 21. The prison service runs these institutions that have a focus on education. They offer vocational training and education. Statistically, a young person released from juvenile prison is far less likely to commit a crime than someone coming out of an adult facility.
The Essay on Adult prisons
... the lever, or inject the needle. Putting young offenders in adult prisons leads to more crime, higher prison costs, and increased violence, not to ... to encourage the youngsters to plea to life without parole. For a 14-15-16 year old, the thought of being strapped ... serious psychiatric problems. All had suffered severe head injuries as children. Only a psychiatrist before trial had even examined five of ...
Overall, children haven’t been always treated all that differently from adults. Adolescence is the period in which young people appear to engage in anti – social activities including crime. For the majority there is a marked fall in criminal behaviour during early adult life, though a minority continues to persist in their offending ‘carrees’. In many ways, therefore, in relation to controlling crime, the aim has been the management of this ‘problem population’. For the whole of the last century and into this, children and young offenders have also been seen as a group necessitating an approach different from that employed with adults. As children are different than adults, they therefore should be treated differently. A child has a long life in front of him, an adult who has committed a crime had his chance, and simply blew it away.
