The dialogue Crito, by Plato, recounts the last days of Socrates, immediately before his execution was going to take place in Athens. In the dialogue, Socrates? friend, Crito, proposes that Socrates escape from prison. Socrates considers this proposal, trying to decide if escaping would be ?just? and ?morally justified.? Eventually, Socrates concludes that the act is considered ?unjust? and ?morally unjustified.? Socrates decides to accept his death penalty and execution. Socrates was a man who would pursuit truth in all matters (Kemerling 1999).
In his refusal to accept exile from Athens or a commitment to silence as a penalty, he takes the penalty While Socrates is awaiting his execution, many of his friends, including Crito, arrive with a foolproof plan for his escape from Athens to live in exile voluntarily. Socrates calmly debates with each friend over the moral value and justification of such an act. ?…people who do not know you and me will believe that I might have saved you if I had been willing to give money, but that I did Crito believed that by helping Socrates to escape, he could go on to fulfill his personal obligations. Also, if Socrates does not follow the plan, many people would assume that his friends did not care about him enough to help him escape or that his friends are not willing to give their time or money in order to help him. Therefore, Crito goes on to argue that Socrates ought After listening to Crito?s arguments, Socrates dismisses them as irrelevant to a decision ?Now you, Crito, are not going to die to-morrow-…-and therefore you are disinterested and not liable to be deceived by the circumstances In the arguments that Socrates makes, what other people think does not matter. The only opinions that should matter are the ones of the individuals that truly know. ?The truth alone deserves to be the basis for decisions about human action, so the only proper approach is to engage in the sort of careful moral reasoning by means of which one may hope to reveal it? (Kemerling 1999).
The Essay on Death Penalty 35
This paper will fallow the process of a capital trial from arrest to execution. It will discus the aspects of federal and state law, trial, appeal, and executions. It will go into further detail on arraignment and the trail details of defense and sentencing. The federal law on capital punishment begins with the constitution, which states in the eighth amendment of the bill of rights that, no ...
According to Socrates, the only opinion that he is willing to consider would ?…if you go forth, returning evil for evil, and injury for injury,…we shall be angry with you while you live, and our brethren, the laws in the world below, will receive you as an enemy; for they will know you have done Socrates? argument moves from one of a general moral decision to the morality of his -But it is always wrong to disobey the state, -Therefore, one ought never to disobey the state (Kemerling 1999) Since avoiding the sentence handed down by the jury would be disobeying the state, Socrates decides not to escape. Socrates chose to honor his commitment to truth and morality, even One of the main arguments made by Socrates, ?Think not of life and children first, and of justice afterwards, but of justice first…For neither will you nor any that belong to you be happier or holier or juster in this life, or happier in another, if you is one of the most important and crucial in the Crito dialogue. Socrates provides a very convincing argument of why he should not escape from the Athenian prison. He states that if he does as Crito suggests and escapes, it will not be justifiable nor true. Although his family and friends will be much happier if he escapes, he will not follow the justice or moral code of the state in which he was born and raised. Socrates also gives the idea that if he were to escape, his family and friends would be happy for him, but their fellow citizens and their state in which they reside would not. The government and citizens of the state may take their frustration of this injustice out on the friends In this argument, Socrates believes that the state would say, ?think not of life and children first, and of justice afterwards?(Plato 566).
The Essay on Adults Because Certain Childhood Life Person Child
Childhood history has a lot to do with how we live as adults because certain childhood events could trigger something that would last a life time. Take for example if a child fails at something and the parent does nothing to help the child, the child will grow up thinking that failing is alright and that he or she will have a hard time in life with their job or in school or life in general. Many ...
He says this as a counter-argument to statement made by Crito saying that he should think of the children that he would be abandoning by not escaping. Crito said that he should escape and raise and teach his children, instead of keeping his penalty. Socrates? statement instead comes from the other end, where he should not think of his children first, but of the truth and morality of the state in which his children will live and grow. If he does escape, the state will lose some of that morality, and his children will be looked down upon. Also, his children will not receive the same kind of justice that they may have gotten if he had not Justice seemed to be a very important factor to Socrates, and is part of his pursuit of truth for all matters. Justice and truth, in the Crito dialogue, go hand-in-hand. Without truth, justice cannot prevail over the wrongdoing in life.
Socrates believed that it is always wrong to break an agreement, and continuing to live his life voluntarily in the state of Athens, constitutes disobedience against the state. He argues that obeying the state is a requirement right up until death. He says that by not obeying the state that he was raised in, is like not obeying his parents that raised him. Socrates was a man who chose his commitment to truth, morality and philosophy over life. He had a great commitment to his state, therefore by disobeying it, he would be committing suicide in a sense. If Socrates had disobeyed his state, he would never be allowed to enter it again, nor would any other allow him to live peacefully.
His arguments throughout the whole dialogue were very strong and made sense. Socrates looked out for his state, while Crito?s arguments were based on himself and how others would view him. Socrates? conclusion to stay in the prison may have cost him his life, but saved the Kemerling, Garth. ?Socrates: Philosophical Life?. 29 May 2000 *http://people.delphi.com/gkemerling/2d.htm*. Stumpf, Samuel Enoch. ?Plato: The Problem of Intellectual and Moral Consistency?. Philosophy:History & Problems. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1994.
Bibliography:
Bibliography Kemerling, Garth. ?Socrates: Philosophical Life?. 29 May 2000 . Stumpf, Samuel Enoch. ?Plato: The Problem of Intellectual and Moral Consistency?. Philosophy:History & Problems. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1994.
The Essay on Tattoo State Health Children
Tattooing in Oklahoma. Tattooing is illegal in our state of Oklahoma. We are the last state in the union not to have this type of body art. I have read in the Daily Oklahoman about a bill has been introduced to Oklahoma legislation that would legalize tattooing in our state. Some citizens think this would be something we need in our state. If we would pass this bill our state would not receive the ...
