For hundreds of years, writers have used religion as a fundamental issue and point of discussion in their novels. Joseph Conrad expressed his views in Heart of Darkness, George Orwell did the same in 1984 and in other writings, and even Ernest Hemingway used his writing to develop his own ideas concerning the church. This is fully evident in his novel A Farewell to Arms. Even in a book in which the large majority of the characters profess their atheism, the ideas of the church materialize repeatedly as both characters and as topics of conversations. Religion is presented through reflections of the protagonist “Lieutenant Henry’, and through a series of encounters involving Henry and a character simply identified as “the priest’. Hemingway uses the treatment of the priest by the soldiers and by Henry himself to illustrate ways of approaching religion in a situation in which God has no place, and employs these encounters between the priest and other characters as a means of expressing religious views of his own.
Most evident to the reader is the distinct difference between the priest’s relationship with Henry and that which he has with the other soldiers. Hemingway repeatedly emphasizes this in all sections of the book, even after Henry is injured, when he is completely isolated from the other soldiers. The first instance the reader sees of this is only six pages into the novel. Hemingway writes, “That night in the mess after the spaghetti course? the captain commenced picking on the priest’ (6-7).
The Term Paper on A Look At Ernest Hemingway’s “Soldier’s Home” Compared To WWI And Shell Shock
World War One (WWI) was arguably the most costly conflict in human history. With over “one third of men returning home” with serious mental ailments, this war had effects long after the armistice treaty (World War I Document Archive 18). This war lasted well past the signing of the treaty and went on to spark the beginning of the Second World War in 1939. Veterans were plagued with ...
The manner in which Hemingway frames this line is suggesting that not only do the soldiers start picking on the priest, but picking on him was the predinner entertainment.
Almost the same scenario is portrayed only a few pages later: “The meal was finished, and the argument went on. We two stopped talking and the captain shouted, Priest not happy. Priest not happy without girls.’ ‘ (14) The soldiers’ ridicule of the priest is again highlighted when Henry, bed-stricken with his injury, asks the priest “How is the mess?’ (69).
The priest replies “I am still a great joke’ (69).
The reader sees an obvious pattern in the relationship between the priest and the others.
More important, though, than the fact that the other soldiers ridicule the priest, is for what he is ridiculed. For one, they question his intelligence, with one soldier proclaiming that “all thinking men are atheists’ (8).
His religious celibacy also becomes an easy target: ‘ Today I see priest with girls.’ ‘ No,’ said the priest. The other officers were amused at the baiting. Priest not with girls,’ went on the captain. Priest never with girls.’ (7) The soldiers begin to call the priest’s masculinity into question.
The captain continues: “Priest every night five against one.’ Every one at the table laughed. ‘ You understand? Priest every night five against one. ? He made a gesture and laughed loudly’ (7).
In this way the question of faith becomes a question of manhood. An officer has pointed out in front of a large group of soldiers, all of whom resort to the whorehouse for entertainment, the fact that the priest does not have sex with women. In the eyes of the soldiers, the priest, who represents all things religious, is not a man.
His masculinity is called into question in a different way as well: Priest wants us never to attack. Don’t you want us never to attack? ‘ No. If there is a war I suppose we must attack.’ ‘ Must attack. Shall attack!’ (14) Here the priest indirectly states his opposition to the war, which later may become common among the soldiers, but at this point is in direct contrast to the macho proclamation that the army “shall attack’ (14).
The Essay on Soldier’s Home – Hemingway
Literary Analysis of Conflicts within “Soldier’s Home” Ernest Hemingway’s “Soldier’s Home” is a short story about one man’s struggle with returning home after war. Harold Krebs had just returned home, later than the majority of the soldiers, resulting in a dull welcoming from his town. In order to be heard, Krebs lies about his war experience through elaborated stories. Even though Krebs is home, ...
Again the differences between the priest and the soldiers are emphasized. Overall, the soldiers express a complete distrust of the church itself.
At one point a soldier says, “The Pope wants the Austrians to win the war’ (7).
Another soldier says “[The book ‘ Black Pig’] is very valuable … it tells you about those priests’ (8).
The priest and all the clergy are, to the soldiers, the enemy, no matter what. Rinaldi, Henry’s companion, expresses the sentiment of the soldiers well: “He is a good priest… but still a priest’ (173).
In other words, he is not to be trusted and not to be taken seriously.
For hundreds of years, writers have used religion as a fundamental issue and point of discussion in their novels. Joseph Conrad expressed his views in Heart of Darkness, George Orwell did the same in 1984 and in other writings, and even Ernest Hemingway used his writing to develop his own ideas concerning the church. This is fully evident in his novel A Farewell to Arms. Even in a book in which the large majority of the characters profess their atheism, the ideas of the church materialize repeatedly as both characters and as topics of conversations.
Religion is presented through reflections of the protagonist “Lieutenant Henry’, and through a series of encounters involving Henry and a character simply identified as “the priest’. Hemingway uses the treatment of the priest by the soldiers and by Henry himself to illustrate ways of approaching religion in a situation in which God has no place, and employs these encounters between the priest and other characters as a means of expressing religious views of his own. Most evident to the reader is the distinct difference between the priest’s relationship with Henry and that which he has with the other soldiers. Hemingway repeatedly emphasizes this in all sections of the book, even after Henry is injured, when he is completely isolated from the other soldiers. The first instance the reader sees of this is only six pages into the novel.
Hemingway writes, “That night in the mess after the spaghetti course? the captain commenced picking on the priest’ (6-7).
The Term Paper on Soldier S Home Krebs Hemingway Girls
He knew he could never get through it all again. "Soldier's Home"I don't want to go through that hell again." The Sun Also Rises In the works of Ernest Hemingway, that which is excluded is often as significant as that which is included; a hint is often as important and thought-provoking as an explicit statement. This is why we read and reread him. "Soldier's Home " is a prime example of this art ...
The manner in which Hemingway frames this line is suggesting that not only do the soldiers start picking on the priest, but picking on him was the predinner entertainment. Almost the same scenario is portrayed only a few pages later: “The meal was finished, and the argument went on. We two stopped talking and the captain shouted, Priest not happy. Priest not happy without girls.’ ‘ (14) The soldiers’ ridicule of the priest is again highlighted when Henry, bed-stricken with his injury, asks the priest “How is the mess?’ (69).
The priest replies “I am still a great joke’ (69).
The reader sees an obvious pattern in the relationship between the priest and the others. More important, though, than the fact that the other soldiers ridicule the priest, is for what he is ridiculed. For one, they question his intelligence, with one soldier proclaiming that “all thinking men are atheists’ (8).
His religious celibacy also becomes an easy target: ‘ Today I see priest with girls.’ ‘ No,’ said the priest. The other officers were amused at the baiting. Priest not with girls,’ went on the captain.
Priest never with girls.’ (7) The soldiers begin to call the priest’s masculinity into question. The captain continues: “Priest every night five against one.’ Every one at the table laughed. ‘ You understand? Priest every night five against one. ? He made a gesture and laughed loudly’ (7).
In this way the question of faith becomes a question of manhood. An officer has pointed out in front of a large group of soldiers, all of whom resort to the whorehouse for entertainment, the fact that the priest does not have sex with women.
In the eyes of the soldiers, the priest, who represents all things religious, is not a man. His masculinity is called into question in a different way as well: Priest wants us never to attack. Don’t you want us never to attack? ‘ No. If there is a war I suppose we must attack.’ ‘ Must attack. Shall attack!’ (14) Here the priest indirectly states his opposition to the war, which later may become common among the soldiers, but at this point is in direct contrast to the macho proclamation that the army “shall attack’ (14).
The Term Paper on A Long Way Gone Memoirs Of A Boy Soldier
A Long Way Gone: Memoirs of a Boy Soldier A Long Way Gone: Memoirs of a Boy Soldier is written by Ismael Beah. The author of the book was born in Sierra Leone in 1980, and then, eighteen years later, he moved to the United States. His biography doesn't remind the lives of ordinary writers, as, unlike them, his life wasn't very sweet. The book tells the story of his childhood, when in 1991 a civil ...
Again the differences between the priest and the soldiers are emphasized.
Overall, the soldiers express a complete distrust of the church itself. At one point a soldier says, “The Pope wants the Austrians to win the war’ (7).
Another soldier says “[The book ‘ Black Pig’] is very valuable … it tells you about those priests’ (8).
The priest and all the clergy are, to the soldiers, the enemy, no matter what. Rinaldi, Henry’s companion, expresses the sentiment of the soldiers well: “He is a good priest… but still a priest’ (173).
In other words, he is not to be trusted and not to be taken seriously.
