The relationship between death and freedom is a common thread throughout Sorrows of a Young Werther by Goethe and Crime and Punishment by Dostoevsky. The relationship illustrated in both works is that one cannot achieve true freedom until they are dead. Until death, Werther and Raskolnikov will always feel the restrictions that society places upon them. Werther feels restricted due to the unrequited love of Lotte and Raskolnikov feels restricted by the moral code that society establishes. In Sorrows of a Young Werther by Goethe and Crime and Punishment by Dostoevsky both characters’ exhibit their freedom through death. In Sorrows of a Young Werther, Werther views suicide as a human right and the ultimate expression of one’s power.
Death representing freedom is evident in Weather’s suicide because he feels that he cannot go on living in such torment. The only way to free him from this torment is to kill himself. In Crime and Punishment death representing freedom is evident in Raskolnikov’s justification for the pawnbroker’s murder. He justifies the murder first through it’s circumstances.
When Raskolnikov discovers that Lizaveta will be out of the house at seven, he views this information as a sign that the murder must be committed, “all liberty of action and free-will were gone.” Next Raskolnikov claims that the pawnbroker deserved to die and it was his duty to rid society of “the wretched little creature.” This mind set shows how murder is an expression of freedom for Raskolnikov because the murder is Raskolnikov’s way of showing his superiority to society. Both Raskolnikov and Werther view themselves as superior to society. Raskolnikov views himself as the Napoleonic great man and Werther views himself as the romantic egoistic. Raskolnikov believes that laws, restrictions, and a moral code only apply to the ignorant and na ” ive common man. Raskolnikov is very confident that the police will never be able to convict him of murder because he can outwit the common policeman.
The Essay on Freedom In This Society Prometheus Transgression Free
Prometheus says that "to be free, a man must be free of his brothers." By reference to the story, explain what Prometheus means by freedom and why he values it. In what significant ways is freedom non-existent in the society from which he escapes - and what are the consequences of that lack of freedom? In Ayn Rand's Anthem, Prometheus says that "to be free, a man must be free of his brothers." ...
Raskolnikov also thinks that he will feel no guilt in committing the murder because he is so powerful and so important that he has the right to decide who is worthy of life. Due to these beliefs he feels that murdering the pawnbroker will confirm his power. Not only will the murder confirm his power but Raskolnikov thinks that if he murders her and feels no guilt, then he will prove that he is truly free from morals. Werther represents the romantic egoists because he thinks that love can conquer all. The fact that Werther is romantic egoist causes him to become obsessed with Lotte. This obsession causes sever suffering because his love is not a returned.
It is not the fact that Werther cannot be with Lotte, but the fact that she does not love him and refuses to see him, that causes Werther to feel like he has no freedom. Werther views himself as a God like person and it is Lotte’s rejection that kills him. Weather’s suicide represents the ultimate expression of freedom because it takes death out of the hands of God or nature and puts it into the hands of Werther. In his final letter to Lotte, Werther expresses the notion that death is his only means for his salvation.
He continually talks about being “resolved to die.” This feeling about death being his only escape is repeated throughout the passage to show the immense suffering that Werther is experiencing. His suffering has come to a head because he final realizes that he cannot be with Lotte. No matter how much he loves Lotte, Werther knows that they cannot be together due to her marriage and devotion to Albert. Werther describes his suffering in a very powerful way when he says, .”..
The Essay on Death Penalty Life Murder States
I disagree with the author, the death penalty does not deter violent crimes. If anything it helps promote the United States as a violent nation. People know of the consequences and still commit murders, and this will not change there will always be deranged members of society no matter what we do. There is another option, life in prison. Life in prison is cheaper and the murders are taken out of ...
my senses were in tumult and disorder; my heart was oppresses, hope and pleasure had fled from me forever, and a petrifying cold had seized my wretched being.” The passage is in the past tense to emphasize a tone of remorse and remembrance. Werther continually recalls past moments of happiness with Lotte which only cause him further suffering. .”.. in his last moments of existence knew no pleasure so great as that of conversing with you!” Werther now realizes that these small moments he spent with Lotte are not enough to fulfill him anymore. None the less Werther writes that, .”.. the recollection of these scenes makes me weep like a child.” The most pogient part of this passage is when Werther realizes that death is something that he must due in order to end his suffering.
Werther is completely confident that death is truly the only option. “To die! It is not despair: it I conviction that I have filled up the measure of my sufferings, that I have reached my appointed term, and must sacrifice myself for thee.” In both novels the relationship between death and freedom is prevalent. For both Rasolnikov’s and Werther’s freedom is not achieved until death. Both characters spend the novels trapped in a universe that restricts them to the point of madness. These restrictions lead them to death, suicide in Werther’s case and murder in Rasolnikov’s case.
The restrictions that society placed upon these characters allowed them to view death as their ultimate expression of their freedom. Word Count: 915.
