1. What is the custom-based standard of care for this case? A guide for standards of care is a way that can evaluate performances. Physicians practice defensive medicine as a way to avoid being considered negligent. This method elevates the reasonable standard even higher. After careful examination of this case I concur, that custom-based standard of care was established. The emergency room staff all seem to follow proper protocol with the examination of the patient to determine the severity of his wounds and stabilizing the patient before the patient was transferred to the operating room. Protocol was met in the OR since it seems all the different kinds of surgeons needed where there performing their duty.
2. What is the reasonable physician standard of care in this case? The reasonable standard a physician would have to perform is evaluating the extent of the injuries and to keep the patient alive while in the ER. Consulting with other physicians and surgeons to determine if surgery is necessary. If possible get the consent of the patient if he is conscious to proceed with the surgery, which is hard to determine since it doesn’t state whether or not the patient was conscious or not. It does state whether or not the physician made an attempt to contact a family member to give consent, which is a matter that should be investigated.
3. What effect would EMTALA have on this case? EMTALA (Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act) requires hospitals to treat anyone needing emergency treatment without regard of the patient’s status or the patient’s ability to pay for the cost. However, a patient may be discharged if the patient chooses to leave after informed consent has been given. This patient seems to not be able to give consent and since the hospital is a Level 1 which is more than capable of treating these type of traumas. I would say EMTALA would not have any effect since it did not turn the patient away for treatment which the patiently direly needed.
The Research paper on Electronic Medical Records a Cure for Health Care Case Study
1.) Identify and describe the problem in this case. The problem in this case is medical record keeping. About 12 percent of healthcare spending goes towards medical recordkeeping. Medical records have been kept in files and folders, which causes difficulty in accessing and sharing information. This problem could be maintained with electronic medical systems. 2.) What people organization and ...
4. What informed consent issues might have occurred? When giving informed consent the patient must first be conscious and have the ability to make a decsion, the patient must be able to understand the information, provide the patient information on the treatment he will receive and the risks involved with those treatments, and get the okay from the patient to proceed with the treatment plan. Some exemptions to that rule are if the patient is unable to give consent or if care is needed immediately to prevent more harm. If he was married and his wife was not immediately contacted to make a decision for him, that might be an issue that may cause problems.
5. Does the doctrine of res ipsa loquitor apply here? Res Ipsa Loquitor means “the thing speaks for itself.” Stating that it can be assumed that the action of the negligent party is what caused the harm to the. With that being said res ipsa loquitor does not apply here since there is not anything the doctors or the surgeons did that could have caused more harm than good and all protocols that goes on in a ER seem to be met.
6. What questions would you ask in determining whether the physicians used best judgment in this case? – Was all the information about the patient noted in his charts? – Were you by any extent impaired during the procedures?
The Essay on Confidentiality & Information Sharing
Much has been written about both the importance of confidentiality and information sharing, and people are often confused by what is meant. It can also be confusing trying to decided what it is ok to share and in what circumstances. Starting right It is helpful to start any professional relationship by telling people what you mean by confidentiality, and in what circumstance you might need to ...
-Was there an attempt to get the patients history such as past injuries or allergies? – Was there any attempt at all to contact the patient’s family members? – Were there any other safer approaches that could have saved the patient?
7. What other questions can you think to ask regarding this case? – If the physician was found negligent, how liable will the hospital be? – When it comes to medical malpractice, what laws to the state apply? – What is the survival rate with patients being treated in this ER?
