The roles and norms of the participants barely varied at the start of the experiment. As time went on, everyone started falling into his roles. Thats when things started changing. For instance the role of the guard was to maintain order in the facility by means of physical or mental punishment. The further they went into the experiment the further they fell into their roles. The expected roles of the prisoners were that they obey the rules and sit in their cells calmly, but that was far from what happened. Once inside the prison, the prisoners started rebelling by placing their mattresses against their doors so the guards couldnt get into their cells or see what they were doing. The guards reaction to this was to take the fire extinguisher and spray it into the cell.
This made the prisoners back away from the doors and allowed the guards to reestablish order in the jail. Now I am going to talk about the norms. For the prisoners, the norms were that they had numbers instead of names, they had to put a stalking on their head to simulate being shaved, dresses had to be worn without undergarments, and the prisoners were put through severe de-individualization. The norms for the guards was that they wore mirrored sunglasses so prisoners couldnt read their emotions, khaki uniforms, whistles around their necks, and billy clubs. The thing that prevented the good guards from objecting to the bad guards was that the good guards didnt want to look weak in front of everyone else. Groupthink also played a big role in this because the guards didnt want any controversy between themselves.
The Essay on Group Roles and Norms
Norms are the expectations of a certain culture on how to behave in a particular situation. These norms are very important because it promotes order within a group. With norms, people know how to act and one will be able to predict outcomes of social interactions because of the consistent nature of these norms (Andersen and Taylor, 2005) Norms may be implicit or explicit. Explicit norms are ...
If this study were to have been done today, I think the results and outcomes would be very different. Back then, prison was a very bad thing and the crime rate was lower than it is today. Now days the prisons are filled with people. Even young kids are having problems with the law today. A lot of this is also because people care less about the government and arent raised with discipline in the households like they used to be, so being in a prison cell for two weeks would look like nothing to them, because they would treat it as a no good experiment and a waste of time. I think it was ethical to do this study because nobody knew what effects this experiment would have on individuals. Another reason I think it is ethical is because those people volunteered to do it.
I can see if they were forced to do it but they volunteered instead. Limiting the physical force allowed to be used on prisoners may change the study, and by reducing the length of time the experiment takes place. I think the U.S. has the highest rate of incarceration in the world because our laws are too lenient. If you look at other countries, their judicial system is a tooth for a tooth and an eye for an eye. In America, if you kill someone, you have to wait several years before receiving the capital punishment.
In other countries, this process only takes a few weeks. This means, not as much money is spent when keeping the person alive and well. To make our judicial system better, I think punishment should be harsher and death row should be a shorter process..
