statutory rape Laws The term “statutory rape” is used when the government considers people under a certain age to be unable to give consent to sex and therefore consider sexual contact with them to be a rape. The age at which individuals are considered to give consent is called the age of consent. The age of consent can ranging from thirteen to twenty-one, depending on the limits set by each state in accordance with local standards of morality. Even sex that violates the age-of-consent laws but is neither violent nor physically forced is described as statutory rape. In most jurisdictions, the expressions “under-age sex” or “sex with a minor” are more commonly used.
After many years of prosecuting statutory rape laws, some people are being to question whether or not these laws when concerning non-violent “sex with a minor” are actually appropriate and effective in protecting the rights of minors. The people who support statutory rape laws would argue that in any relationship where one legal aged partner is significantly older than the other, the older of the two has a greater power advantage over the younger. Thus even if a person under the age of consent agrees to sexual activity, it is still considered lawfully to be rape, because that person is not mature enough to make a well thought-out decision. Adults fear that the younger person in the relationship may be unconsciously forced emotionally, if not physically, into engaging in sexual acts with their partner. According to the Taking Sides (Issue 17), “Statutory rape laws are designed, in part, to keep these types of unequal relationships from becoming human nature.” Others who disagree with statutory rape laws claim that the problem arises when young legal aged men, are sentenced to jail for statutory rape based solely on the age difference between him and his partner. These convicted young men state that once the parents of their younger partner find out about the two having sex, the parents just wanted to punish the men.
The Term Paper on Rape Shield Law Sexual Victim Women
In the 1970's, under pressure from feminist activists, lawyers, and legislators, most states changed their rape laws to ease the emotional burden of rape victims who testified in court. They had found that, for many women, going through the legal process was as painful as the rape itself. No longer did a woman have to show up in the court with broken bones and missing teeth to be taken seriously. ...
The argument for the opponents of statutory rape laws declared that some teenagers mature faster than others. Consequently, people no matter the age should able to make their own decisions regarding sex, so long as sex remains consensual by both parties. But then again, how can one prove that the younger teenager is more mature than that of their average age? Personally, I support the United States prosecuting statutory rape laws, however I believe that the lines of what qualifies as statutory rape seem to have gotten blurrier as time passed. Therefore, the government should create a clear differentiation between the two types of statutory rapes and then a set of clear guidelines should be constructed. The first form of statutory rape occurs when a person violently rapes an unwilling child under the age of consent, whether that person is a stranger or family member (incest).
This form is defined and in some cases more serious, deserving harsher punishment than the other. The second kind of statutory rape is when a person of legally age is accused of rape, by reason of committing sexual activities with their significantly younger partner. Under this circumstance, “sex with a minor”, is when things are no longer only black and white. Violent rape is rape; no matter how old the victim; on the other hand “under age sex” gets tricky. I suppose what is problematic about the second situation is that different states have different ages of consent. For instance, in California an eighteen-year-old boy could technically be put in jail for having sex with his seventeen-year-old girlfriend, because the age of consent in California is eighteen.
The Dissertation on Comparing Freedom of Expression in the Statutory Law and the Sharia Law
Getting in touch with media law during the first semester of my Masters gave me a sense of the importance of law in general because it consists of acts and articles which organise most issues in the human’s life in a way that protects ethics and morals. Regardless of the hypocrisy and double-standards of the countries which raise high the slogan of Human Rights, I liked the Human Rights ...
However, this situation would be fine if the two “love birds” lived in Hawaii, where the age of consent is fourteen. Is it fair that depending on the state we reside in, determines who we date? Also, is it right that an eighteen-year-old is wrong for having a sexual relationship with a girl who is only one year younger than him, but may not be of the age of legal consent? Then is it okay for a seventeen-year-old to have intercourse with a sixteen-year-old, since both are under the age of consent? So can one see where the perspectives get foggy and the laws need to be adjusted consequently. Not all these questions can be easily resolved, however could be if the following occurred. In my opinion, all US states should have one uniform age of consent, sixteen. My own experience is that many sixteen and seventeen-year-old teens know the emotions and consequences of having sex, just as much as teens of eighteen and nineteen. I also believe that a three-year range of difference in age suitable, with a guideline constructed stating this.
Hence, anyone older than nineteen-years who is having intercourse with a sixteen-year-old can be persecuted as the law regulates. I understand the legal age is eighteen, but dating someone three years older is common. I would not make the age of consent fifteen, because I don’t believe it is appropriate to for teenagers to not be having sex much earlier than the age of sixteen (if at all) in any case. Why should American enforce statutory rape laws anyways? At one time, the primary purpose was to guard the virginity of young maidens against seduction by deceitful men. The main objective of statutory rape laws has become to protect young girls from sexually abused relationships. According to one study stated in Taking Sides (Issue 17), “seventy-four percent of women who had intercourse before age fourteen and sixty percent of women who had sex before fifteen report having had a forced sexual experience.” Another hope is that with statutory rape laws, society will decrease the teen pregnancy rate and the number of young families who are fatherless.
The Essay on The Drinking Age Year Legal College
Underage drinking has always been a major problem in society. The immaturity of teenagers contributes to their inability in understanding the dangerous effects that drinking has on their families and themselves. All they think about is how much fun they will have on Friday nights, bingeing beer. They don t think about what could happen while they re too drunk to know what they are doing, or the ...
Statutory rape laws are valuable in protecting the rights of minors. Possibly, if the laws were revamped to suit the changing attitudes’ of modern society, the law would be more effective. In place of worrying about the misinterpreted claims of statutory rape, prosecutors can focus on the more crucial cases. With more defined modern guidelines, society would be aware of the laws regarding statutory rape and some more pleased. Statutory rape laws are no longer used to prohibit teenagers from having sex.
Instead, the regulations are to make certain that the teenagers who are having sexual intercourse are not unknowingly being emotionally forced into it by their significantly older partner’s power. Ideally, statutory rape laws can only improved the lives of teenagers.
