Stunting Growth of the Severely Mentally Disabled Children Introduction While every one can argue and counter argue about every possible thing on the earth and when such an argument is related to a child who is mentally so severely disabled, perhaps the correct thing would be to let the parents or those loving individuals on whom such a child would have to completely be dependent on decide and act accordingly on the childs best interests. It has to be kept in mind that these difficult decisions are never made in a hurry and the future long-term aspects for the welfare and upkeep of such children are deliberated because any conclusive action is taken. The issues related to morality, religion, convention methods of viewing lives are very easy to argue over for the sake of making a point. If perhaps the people who advocate against the principles and practice of stunting the growth of severely disabled mental children for whom medically it has been confirmed that they would live permanently as a retarded person; should be asked to take full time care of such a child for a maximum two or three day period. It is only after experiencing the disturbing anguish and feeling of sorrow, while attending the every need of such children like bathing and cleaning them and this includes changing their soiled clothing, as such children can not even express themselves, the feeding times, sleeping times, playing times and even the minute detail of realizing if the child is comfortably postured or not has be taken into consideration. Very soon the people against the stunting of growth of such children are going to have second opinions and most would like change their stance of being anti to pro supporters to stunt the growth of such children.
The Essay on Children and Screen Time
Every parent wants nothing more then their child to succeed. They want their child to develop and learn with out struggle. In this day in age we have access to so many devices that can help contribute to a child’s success. Many will argue that a device such as a I-pad or mobile device will hinder ones learning. I feel the exact opposite will occur, and the child will gain knowledge. Children ...
Like the famous biblical saying goes; let only those who are not sinners cast the first stone, and similarly in a subject as controversial as this one, let people first experience the living and exist with a disabled child that is severely handicapped before passing their judgment on whether the stunting of their growth is in any way right or wrong. (Forever Young & Ronald Bailey, January 5, 2007, Stunting the Growth of a Mentally Disabled Child–Is It Moral?) Argument in Support of Stunting Growth in Children with Irreversible Mental Disability Before we take here the example of the child Ashley now made famous by the supporters and advocates of the anti-stunting methods being adopted through the media and other forums, we should with some sense of humanity in us try to realize the pain and anguish that there parents must have gone through to medically stunt her growth. Any decent person in this world would never try to harm any child or even an animal and if either of them were to get lost, they would go to great pains even if it was at the cost of their own time, money and efforts to make sure such a child or animal was united as soon as possible with their parents and with particularity with the mother.
With the natural human mentality being such how can anyone even for a moment think that Ashleys parents would not have thought of their blood childs best welfare and subjected their daughters growth without any reason? Even the expressing of such anti feelings towards their decision which definitely must have been done after deliberately discussing and considering all the options that little Ashley, born with brain damage that was irreversible had left her paralyzed as well as severely retarded. (Ronald Bailey, January 5, 2007, Stunting the Growth of a Mentally Disabled Child–Is It Moral?) Reasons to Support Stunting Growth in Children with Irreversible Mental Disability In this essay it has to be clarified that it is only the severely mentally disabled children who are to be taken into context the stunting of whose growth is supported by the writing because of following conviction filled reasons: In general severely mentally disabled children are unable to talk, walk or support themselves, clean and maintain themselves and at times even not able to maintain or make meaningful eye contact. Such children are perpetually stuck in infant age and their mental capabilities are frozen as such. By keeping such children smaller, they are easier to handle and take care of.
The Research paper on Child Growth and Development
I. Introduction This case study is about a child that was born premature, at the twenty-fifth week of pregnancy. With the complication of being born that early the baby girl had many problems her first couple of months of life. Being in the hospital for five months she was fighting for her life each and every day. The child was hooked up to numerous machines to keep her alive. Doctors gave her ...
Through the advances in medical science through surgical procedures the sexual organs specifically of such children can be altered or removed so that the risks related sexual abuse of such innocent and helpless children are reduced. Importantly, when such children are easier to be carried around they can be included in family gatherings and provided more with the loving care that they deserve. On the other hand, we can also imagine such children being allowed to become adults where naturally they would become too heavy to handle and take care of. Without medication that would stem their growth, there would also be the possibility that they would harm themselves and others by developing aggressive tendencies. Overall the point that is being made in this essay is of suggesting the best possible solution with regard to the long term caring and best welfare that severely mentally disabled children should deservedly be given. These methods are not a solution like putting them to sleep or removing them from our lives but handling them with the tender-most loving and merciful care that is possible.
And by stunting the growth of such children contrary to whatever people may be saying, mercy is being shown to such children and their parents and well-wishers as this remains the only correct option that can be taken in such circumstances. (Lindsay Beyerstein, 2007) Conclusion Sometimes it is a healthy attitude in human beings to argue about the issues of morality, religion, social and political correctness or otherwise through which positive results can be achieved. Opinions that we have are our god-given gifts and our rights to be expressed as we see them in our everyday world. But when opinions are imposed on the grounds or morality in cases where the mental distress and pain not only of suffering people but their near and close ones or when viewed with logic and reality wrong because they controversially harm more then do any good. Just like stunting the growth of severely mentally retarded with irreversible treatment confirmed as not possible the cases of patients who opt for euthanasia because of the excruciating pain, distress and humiliating they have to undergo while forcefully having to bear through and sometimes have live with different levels of indignity such as forced feeding, their bathing and changing of clothes who may be totally strange people performing their duties without any personal feelings etc.
The Term Paper on Children And The Internet
Although the U.S. created the Internet in the 1960s as a communications tool for the military, it was not until after the government opened it to the public in the late 1980s that the Internet became a unique communications phenomenon. Nobody could predict the speed by which people all over the world grabbed onto this new form of technological communication. In 1995, there were an estimated 56 ...
Laws therefore in such decisions should be enacted that would allow suffering people or in case of their incapacitated states where medically nothing more can be done; personal decisions should be recognized as a legal choice but under restricted control so that if such liberties are granted, they are not abused. (Jessica Steinmetz, Disabilities Site, Pillow Angel – Stunting Growth of a Physically Disabled, BellaOnline’s Disabilities Editor) Works Cited: Don Berkich, January 10, 2007, 9-year-old girl deliberately stunted, Professional Ethics (Accessed: May 2, 2007) http://ethics.tamucc.edu/article.pl?sid=07/01/10/2 153245 Forever Young (Accessed: May 2, 2007) http://blamebush.typepad.com/blamebush/science/ind ex.html Jessica Steinmetz, Disabilities Site, Pillow Angel – Stunting Growth of a Physically Disabled, BellaOnline’s Disabilities Editor (Accessed: May 2, 2007) http://www.bellaonline.com/articles/art48415.asp Lindsay Beyerstein, January 6, 2007, Parents stunt growth of profoundly disabled daughter, freelance journalist, Majikthise (Accessed: May 2, 2007) http://majikthise.typepad.com/majikthise_/2007/01/ parents_stunt_g.html Ronald Bailey, January 5, 2007, Stunting the Growth of a Mentally Disabled Child–Is It Moral? (Accessed: May 2, 2007) http://www.reason.com/blog/show/117687.html.
