Supreme Court Justice Nominations According to Floyd G. Cullop, The Supreme Court is responsible for “interpreting a federal, state, and local law and deciding whether or not it is constitutional,” making The Supreme Court of the United States perhaps the most powerful branch of the Federal Government. Although the Supreme Court does not make the laws, the justices do review the laws and decide if they are Constitutional. In fact, over the course of a justice’s tenure on The Supreme Court, he or she will have many opportunities to review laws and his or her decisions could affect the lives of many Americans. Furthermore, Supreme Court justices serve life terms, meaning that they hopefully do not have to make decisions in the hopes of getting re-elected. Although politics plays a heavy role in the nomination and subsequent confirmation of justices to the Supreme Court, hopefully after being confirmed, justices will follow the Constitution and make decisions fairly and justly.
The qualifications to become a justice of the Supreme Court are the most lenient of the three branches of government. Actually, there are no formal requirements to be a justice. However, MSN Encarta says, “justices have all been lawyers, and most pursued legal and political careers before serving on the Court.” And since most have had political careers prior to their term on the Supreme Court, justices undoubtedly have had an affiliation with a political party. In fact, it was a President who initially nominated the individual for the position of justice and the Senate who confirmed them. The President and members of the Senate are very much influenced by their party, which makes it unlikely that they would nominate or confirm someone for the Supreme Court who would go against their party’s agenda.
The Essay on Does Breaking a Law Makes a Criminal?
To judge whether breaking a law makes a criminal, first we must define the terms law and crime. Every society makes and enforces laws that govern the conduct of the individuals. Without law we cannot live. Laws maximizes our individual right, facilitate the orders of our society, and it keeps peace in our civilization. The violation of those duties that he or she owes to society and for the breach ...
Idealistically, the President will nominate the best person to reside on the Supreme Court, and since the office in question has to due with allocating justice, the individual should be both fair and honest. Unfortunately, the process is more political than idealistic. According to MSN Encarta, “Presidents often try to secure Senate support by balancing the Court’s geographic and regional background. Many 20 th-century presidents have also tried to balance the Court’s religious, racial, ethnic, and gender makeup.” So, rather than nominate the most qualified candidate, the President will put forth the nominee most likely to remain loyal and who is most likely to be confirmed. Confirmation of a candidate by the Senate is also political.
MSN Encarta asserts that “on average, the Senate rejects about 20 percent of all nominees to the Supreme Court. The president’s choice must face questioning by the Senate Judiciary Committee, which then makes a recommendation to the Senate as a whole.” A majority vote in the Senate is required for a nominee to be confirmed to the Supreme Court. Once a justice has been confirmed, theoretically he or she will not be affected by outside forces. However, the position is typically attained by an individual after years of service to one political party or the other, begging the question, is it possible for a judge to act apolitically, free from the influence of interfering sources? The answer is: he or she cannot help but be affected by these forces After all, it was politics that initiated the individual into the fraternity of the Supreme Court.
It is my opinion that the current system of nominating and confirming Supreme Court justices is outdated. Although the method now is an excellent example of checks and balances because the Senate can reject the President’s candidate, a better method would be one that includes the opinions of the people. Of all the branches of the Federal government, justices have the longest terms: life. It seems unfathomable that the people of the United States have no say in who will interpret their laws. My suggestion to improve the process of selecting justices would be to have an election, whenever necessary, like that of a presidential election. This way the people will have the ultimate check on the government.
The Term Paper on District Court Senate House Speaker
Approval of the Journal 1. The Speaker shall take the Chair on every legislative day precisely at the hour to which the House last adjourned and immediately call the House to order. Having examined and approved the Journal of the last day's proceedings, the Speaker shall announce to the House his approval thereof. The Speaker's approval of the Journal shall be deemed agreed to unless a Member, ...
Works Cited Cullop, Floyd G… The The Constitution of the United States: an Introduction. New York: Penguin Books, 1999 Supreme Court of the United States, Microsoft (R) Encarta (R) Online Encyclopedia 2005 web (c) 1997-2005 Microsoft Corporation. All Rights Reserved.
