In America we value the freedom of the press. The press is the one place where most Americans go to get educated on issues facing their community, state, and most of all nation. Everyone knows that the media plays a major role in Americans lives; however their role of gatekeeper is not completely understood. The press decides which issues to report and how to report them. In order to improve the nation and world, the media should present their unbiased findings to allow people to make up their own minds. However, this is not the case. The media often shows its bias.
Their widespread exposure enables them to communicate their ideas to the public, regardless of the publics responsiveness. The elections of officials for the federal government during the late 20th century serve as prime examples of their bias. An analysis of surveys, media delivery, and reporters testimonies, I have found that the media is actually more out of touch with mainstream America than the politicians they cover. The media affects American interest towards politics by only showing the people what they want them to see. Even if there are many issues in a campaign, the media will focus on the ones they believe to be the most important. Other issues maybe completely ignored. Hence people become interested only in certain areas of politics since they hear about them very often.
There is usually a much greater turnout when voting for the president than voting for a Senator. This is mainly because the media covers a presidential race much more closely. Americans focus on what the media frequently shows us rather than the little heard of issues of greater importance. A large number of people do not follow local elections mainly because they do not hear about it on the six oclock news. I think that many Americans do not even know their Senators or House Representatives name. On the other hand, it would be very difficult to find someone who does not know anything about the recent presidential election.
The Term Paper on How the Media Affect What People
The standard assertion in most recent empirical studies is that "media affect what people think about, not what they think. " The findings here indicate the media make a significant contribution to what people think—to their political preferences and evaluations—precisely by affecting what they think about. A he belief that long dominated the scholarly community is that news messages have "minimal ...
Everyone knows about the Florida ballot disputes only because the media has placed so much emphasis on them. There is so much media coverage in politics today that in order to be elected one must be appealing to the public. Years ago the only way people could find out about candidates and the issues they stood for was by reading a newspaper or listening to the radio. Today, anyone can turn on the television or go to a web site on the Internet and see the candidates themselves talking about their issues. With almost all American homes having at least one television, a candidate must possess a good personality, plans and ideas. Now, more than ever Americans place excessive importance on appearance.
This means that a candidate has to appear successfully, competent and inspire confidence. When was the last time a president was elected based on appearances? It was probably in the 1800s with the election of Abe Lincoln. History shows what a great president he was. It sounds very superficial, but unfortunately this is true of our society. Candidates have to appeal to the public as much as possible, and appear comfortable on camera. However a candidates appearance is not the only thing that plays a major role in getting them elected.
In 1984, the nations economy was booming, most people were happy with their leader, and Ronald Reagan was up for reelection. Reagan had previously helped the nation cope with a recession, and had been in office when American hostages were released. With things going so well one wonders why anyone would oppose this popular conservative leader. However, former Vice President Walter Mondale disenchanted with the way things were going, ran for and received the Democratic nomination. Immediately, the press had found their new man. He was going to be the one to cut defense spending, to increase the reach of the government, and to make sure the government was there to consistently support the poor.
The Essay on How does Mass Media affect people in society?
So far, there’re various media for people to choose and access the information such as television, radio, Internet, or even mobile phone, consequently, media have a full capacity to set a social subject for mass audience to think and talk about. Often, media do not deliberately set the agenda and determine the pros and cons of that particular issue, so it repeatedly causes bad consequences ...
In order to do this, at the 1984 Democratic Convention, Walter Mondale announced that he would raise taxes on the American people. The people were outraged, conservatives went wild, and the press sat quiet, leaving their criticism to a minimum. They were not as bothered by this news as one would think. Perhaps they were supportive of Mondale because, they thought taxes needed to be raised in order to help with the debt caused by new government programs and the rising costs of current ones. If this were the case then one would expect them to praise a conservative such as George Bush when he raised taxes in response to pressure from a Democratic Congress. Instead, they only pointed out that he had gone back on a promise, and refused to admit that what he did was put the economy on the road to becoming the strong system it is today. As for Reagan, when Election Day finally came around, the president had been reelected with 59% of the popular vote, and carried 49 states.
He only lost Mondales home state, and even that by a small margin. Despite the large majority that Reagan won with, he received no help from the White House Correspondents. Out of ten of these correspondents surveyed, all ten voted for Mondale while zero voted for Reagan (US News & World Report).
At a time when the American people were clearly united, the media went against the mainstream and voted for the liberal. The American public was backing Reagans policies, but the media was not. Every morning and night, people turn on their televisions to be informed of what is going on in their country.
Instead of getting the simple facts in reporting, they receive the medias personal spin. Many Washington reporters do not simply come out and say they are in favor of a certain policy, yet they deliver information in a way which makes the alternative appear absurd. The new Republican majority in Congress took a big step today on its legislative agenda to demolish or damage government aid programs, many of them designed to help children and the poor, reports Dan Rather (Liberal Bias).
The Essay on Ronald Regan Reagan American People
Ronald Reagan Dinesh D'SousaAt the end of his two terms in office, Ronald Reagan viewed with satisfaction the achievements of his innovative program known as the Reagan Revolution, which aimed to reinvigorate the American people and reduce their reliance upon Government. He felt he had fulfilled his campaign pledge of 1980 to restore 'the great, confident roar of American progress and growth and ...
After hearing such words as demolish, the average American automatically believes that what the Republicans are doing is harmful to society. Instead of reporting that Congress repealed some government programs, or trimmed spending, the media insisted on sensationalizing the news and making it seem as if the Congress was evil. Not to mention when the public turns out to support a conservative view, the media then works to lessen its importance and appeal.
….
