The Pardoner’s Tale is arguably the finest short narrative in Geoffrey Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales. The tale of three men that attempt to kill Death, but instead die themselves is a story of exceptional intellect, moral, and humour. These three qualities are quite unsurprising considering the actual author of these tales. What is surprising though is that the character that tells this fantastic story is the Pardoner. There have been many studies on Chaucer’s characterisation of the Pardoner, most of which have concentrated on his amoral attitude or on his sexuality. However, in this essay a different side of the Pardoner will be explored, his humour, his intellect, his skills, and even his morals. One work in particular stands out above from others in both its completeness and in the time of its publication. Chaucer’s Pardoner by George Lyman Kittredge, published in 1893, precludes the current outspoken, post-modernist academic paradigm in which much of the study on the character of the Pardoner has centered on him as a eunuch and a homosexual. Instead Kittredge examines the Pardoner as an intelligent scoundrel that experiences a internal moral dilemma during the prologue, tale and epilogue.
Kittredge’s work focuses on the consistency of the character of the Pardoner. First, the Pardoner as a hustler is examined.
For myn entente is nat but for to winne, And no thing for correction of sinne: I rekke nevere whan that they been beried Though that hir soules goon a-blakeberied. That is, as Kittredge makes note, the Pardoner is only concerned with his personal financial gain. He has no concern for the reformation of morals or for the truthfulness genuineness of those people attempting to repent. Further evidence of the Pardoner as an immoral swindler is exemplified in his lack of concern for stealing from the poor and starving. Al were it yiven of the poorest page, Or of the pooreste widwe in a village- Al sholde hir children sterve for famine. It makes no difference to him if he is swindling widows or their starving children. Further example of the Pardoner as an amoral character is shown with his denounciation of the seven mortal sins. In keeping with his hypocritical and cynical attitude, he is guilty of all seven. This last portion is generally used to show the evils of the Pardoner but instead another interpretation is made possible by his frank cynicism. The Pardoner is a very humorous character when he has the opputunity to be himself rather than the clergyman that he must pretend to be while conducting his business.
The Essay on A Physicians Tale By Geoffrey Chaucer
A Physician's Tale by Geoffrey Chaucer Summary and Analysis The Physician's Tale is not among the most notable of the Geoffrey Chaucer tales, significantly because it is much simpler in its way of narration and conclusion than other Canterbury Tales. As Titus Livius, the Physician, tells the reader, Virginius, a noble knight of Old Rome, had the most beautiful daughter anyone could imagine: 7 Fair ...
This is best shown in the manner in which he denounces his practise and the reagard in which he holds himself. The humour of the Pardoner also coincides very well with his intellect and wit. This tale shows his intelligence and wit especially in the discussion between the three companions and the old man. “Now sires,” quod he, “if that ye be so lief To finde Deeth, turne up this crooked way, For in that grove I lafte him, by my fay, Under a tree, and there he wol abide: Nat for your boost he wol him no thing hide. In this dialogue the companions are seeking the person of Death, while the old man is instead directing them where they may find their deaths. Now although this is just one example of the combination of humour and intelligence in the character of the Pardoner, his true intelligence is best exemplified by the rest of the story that surrounds this dialogue. It also seems that the intelligence of the Pardoner has become known to his fell travellers. And right anoon thise gentils gan to crye, “Nay, lat him telle us of no ribaudye. Tel us some moral thing that we may lere, Some wit, and thanne wol gladly heere.” His companions do not want some vulgar joking tale, they want an intelligent moral story and the Pardoner readily delivers with the tale of the three companions seeking out Death. His skill as an orator of tales is undeniably fantastic, and we experience him at his best in this tale. His aptitude at storytelling has also allowed him to show his skill as an adept hustler. His business has brought him over a hundred marks in his first year, which at the time was a fair sum of money. The manner in which he gained this money is shown in the epilogue to the Pardoner’s Tale.
The Term Paper on The Irony of the Pardoner Tale
We know from the General Prologue that the Pardoner is as corrupt as others in his profession, but his frankness about his own hypocrisy is nevertheless shocking. He bluntly accuses himself of fraud, avarice, and gluttony—the very things he preaches against. And yet, rather than expressing any sort of remorse with his confession, he takes a perverse pride in the depth of his corruption. The ...
This immoral, unscrupulous, intelligent and humorous character has been psychologized in many other English papers. A common conclusion is that during the Epilogue he is being serious in his request for money from his companions. This interpretation degrades the intelligence and skill of the Pardoner in that he has already told his fellow travellers he is a fraud and to ask money of them at this point would be “superhuman folly”. Kittredge dedicates a large portion of his argument in defence of the Pardoner’s rant during the epilogue. His conclusion is that the tale the Pardoner told has left him in a state of moral dilemma. The Pardoner is confused by his mixed emotions and the seriousness that has overtaken him. He allows his speech to go on for too long to allow some joculiarity into the serious tone that has presented itself. It is clear that the Pardoner is not an easy character to understand. He is at times immoral and quite deceitful. While at others he is honest and humorous. The main division therefore lies in whether the weight is placed on his actions or on his words.
