Various crimes have select penalties in which they are accompanied with. As a part of the American way, fairness and justice is the prime concern in the court of law. However, some specific crimes do not seem to fit the punishment. Although these serious offenses are in fact crimes, their penalties coincide with unlawful acts that effect more people, and therefore should not be of the same punishment.
Examples of these unequal ratios are the comparisons between murder and kidnapping laws to those of drug crimes. These offenses are indeed actions that effect more than one person in a negative way. The victims, along with their families and friends, are impacted dramatically when a person is lost, missing, or even dead. These effects last long after justice is served. But how well is this justice served? Are murderers on the same levels of drug offenders? First degree murder is the most heinous crime with the harshest penalties in the American judicial system. No other offense will allow the same punishments to convicts, which honestly makes perfect sense.
However, second degree murder calls for up to a $25, 000 fine and / or four to twenty years in prison, (Rockton site).
This crime, voluntary manslaughter, is the deliberate and intentional murder of a person. Along with this crime^aEURTMs penalty, there is an equal punishment if the act was drug related. For possessing fifteen grams of cocaine without intent to sell, an offender will be exposed to the same consequences as if they would have shot and killed a young woman in the middle of a crowded building, (Hoffman Estates site).
The Essay on Fyodor Dostoevsky's "Crime And Punishment"
In “Crime and Punishment” one witnesses a murder as it is graphically described by Fyodor Dostoevsky. How, after such a graphic display of evil, can the reader be compassionate towards Raskolnikov? Superficially, Rodion Raskolnikov appears purely evil, but readers become sympathetic towards his character through in a depth scrutiny of his personality. The full presentation of ...
Possession of that amount of cocaine is indeed an offense, but does it equal the loss of a life? If this criminal was selling this amount, the charge should be higher since more people are affected. For example, it would be suicide if one were to overdose on the amount of cocaine, but if an overdose was a result of one^aEURTMs sales, than this action would be dubbed involuntary manslaughter, or the unintentional act leading to a death.
However, this consequence is only of possession, not supplying to another person who could harm themselves. Another example of these extreme penalties is the common link between kidnapping and possession of methamphetamine. Possession of five grams of methamphetamine with intent to sell is obviously a disgusting way of life, but so is the abduction of a person. With intent to sell, possession of five grams of methamphetamine may result in a $250, 000 fine and four to fifteen years in prison, (Lawyers. com /confirmed by M. Peluso).
This is a huge consequence which does not even come close to the penalties for kidnapping. In fact, the kidnapping punishment of $25, 000 and three to seven years in jail is minuscule in relation to the drug crime, (Rockton site / confirmed by M. Peluso).
Beyond that, aggravated kidnapping, the act of kidnapping along with great bodily harm, abduction of a child less than thirteen or if the victim is seriously mentally retarded, the penalty is only $25, 000 and six to thirty years in the penitentiary, (Hoffman Estates and Rockton sites).
The fact that this kind of act is by far less than a methamphetamine charge is sickening. Clegg could have been kidnapping and murdering a little girl and he would be free before a man that sold and / or possessed drugs. A crime should be punished, and justice should be served. The American justice system is very confusing to me in the fact of these offenses of murder and kidnapping change lives forever, yet the sentence is less than or equal to the crime of hurting oneself. America needs to take a serious look at the consequences of these offenses and assess which is more heinous. Is the kidnapping and murder of a mentally retarded person the same act of possessing fifteen grams of cocaine without intent to sell? Some punishments just do not seem to coincide with the crime.
The Essay on Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Hate Crimes Act
‘Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Hate Crimes Act’ Introduction ‘Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Hate Crimes act’ is a federal law against hate crimes which was passed in 2009 after two ruthless preference motivated crimes of murder of James Byrd Junior., an African American man in 1998 and murder of a student Matthew Shepard in the same year. The key provisions of this act or ...
Drug offenders are being punished more than kidnappers and murderers when the acts of crime are very different in its effects on humanity. With these presented facts, it is now clear that the American way is not as perfect as we would all like to think it is.