People try to improve the society human beings live in and the surrounding environment. The community improves the technology in office buildings, factories, and especially in laboratories where scientists test and make new discoveries. In laboratories, scientists experiment specifically on animals to develop more knowledge about human conditions. Though animal testing seems necessary, people push aside the negative effects that cause animals to suffer. As laboratories increase the use of animal experimentation for the study of human health and the cosmetic industry, protesters demand an end to the inhumane practices which cause needless suffering and death to innocent creatures.
Testing on animals show the torture they face as they hopelessly go through pain and suffering during studies for human health. For example, when studying for diseases “[most] medical research based on ‘the animal model of human disease’ maintains that [it will] reproduce spontaneous human diseases, such as cancer, diabetes, Alzheimer’s, AIDS, etc., on healthy, non-human animals” (Martindale).
... (Animal Experimentation 1). Laboratories use animal models to model human conditions by producing ailments in the animals that mimic human problems. ... longer be the original, natural disease (Animal Experimentation 1). Animals cannot get human diseases, so it is impossible to ... models. Other affective alternatives to animal research include studying an actual human being. Volunteers and patients can ...
People thoughts on animal experimentation for diseases on humans helps cure and save many lives, but they do not know the many risks and hazardous mistakes one scientist can make. Many problems occur during these practices and it does not make a difference from testing on humans. Second, when making medicine, “[rats recieve] a heart drug called Milrinone that [increases] the survival rate of the rats; however, when humans acquires the same drug, the death rate [increases] by thirty percent” (Woods 25).
Giving out medicine to either animals or humans do not have the same effect to each other. The outcome shows the unrelability that animal testing has when trying to make medicine for humans. Third, testing on animals influence health risks because “results often [transcend to inconclusiveness] and cannot accurately extrapolate [on] humans; [as] a result, relying on the results of animal testing [leads to] dangerous human health” (Thomas).
Human have a high risk of dangerous health problems because of the mistakes that go on in the lab. Wavering results jeopardizes human lives and may even lead to death. Overall, animal testing for human health exhibits bad effects that cause humans to change their own lives in a negative way.
Next off, the experiments and tests that animals endure for cosmetics products used by people all over the world cause the helpless critters to suffer excruciating pain. In fact, over 175 cosmetic companies alone in the United States use animals testing for their products (“Companies”).
For such a large number of companies it depends upon many more animals to test on. Companies should focus more on alternatives to animal testing rather than increase the numbers of animals put into the lab. Furthermore, “[in] the Draize test, caustic substances placed in the eyes of conscious rabbits evaluate [the] damage [done] to sensitive eye tissues” (“Cosmetics”).
The torment that the rabbits endure leaves them to suffer in misery. They do feel pain but cannot speak their minds because the inability to so they have no choice but to go through the torture. In addition, “[scientists] who oppose the use of animals in research believe that [one cannot] simply compare the reactions of an animal with that of a human being” (Woods 49).
... animal testing is the right way to test products. The fact is animal testing somewhat effects animal but it does not effect humans. In addition, animals ... largely on research with animals. According to fbresearch. com, "research in animals will hopefully someday help scientists find the cure for ... in the past 20-25 years. The highest results for the reduction of animal research ranges from 20% - 50%. ...
People believe that because animals and humans have similar features, testing on animals or humans will produce the same result, but it does not. The body of humans and animals show completely different symptoms and can throw off the results easily. To summarize, cosmetic companies do not need to use animals to test their products on because it will only cause more innocent lives to go through unnecessary pain.
Moreover, as humans continue to hurt animals and bring pain upon them, scientists, in particular, have different theories and beliefs about why one must not test on animals. For example, when “[handling] and caging animals for testing [purposes it] causes so much stress in the animal that test results [may vary]” (Judson 18).
The animals build up so much tension that it will give off misleading outcomes. Inaccuracy in the results will cause risky issues to humans. In fact, “[animal] experimentation prolonged the emergence of many medical cures by relying [too much] on animal research [so] scientists [have] failed to explore other methods” (Thomas).
By relying on animals to use in testing, scientists failed many experimentations because of the unreliable results the animal caused. Alternatives to animal testing will have saved millions of innocent animals and left scientist to discover many other things. Finally, ” ‘Author Peter Singer [states] that animals cannot talk or reason . . . [but] they think and feel in their own way; [this implies that] animals deserve the same consideration as human beings’ ” (Woods 39).
Even though animals do not have the given choice to speak, they still experience different types of emotions like humans. If humans have the right to speak their minds and give their opinions then animals deserve to have the same amount of respect. To sum up, scientists need to realize that animals have the same rights as humans because everyone deserves equal opportunity and chance.
As labs continue to justify the usage of animal testing for human purposes, abolitionists advocate a stop to useless examinations that wound the creatures. Scientists decrease the amount of animals they use because they realize that animals have feelings. They conclude that animals do not give accurate results, so they turn to other alternatives that will give more precise values. Other areas have also started to reduce their usage on animals as they see the burden put on animals. In conclusion, as society further improves the world without the use of animals in testing, they have taken a step to stop abuse everywhere.
... animals when it comes to superiority in life. Ryder also writes, 'Experimenting on humans might well produce far more valid results than do tests ... a lot of good has come out of animal research and animal testing, this does not make up for all the ... that we consider lower than themselves. In Animal Revolution, Richard Ryder writes, 'Scientist frequently justify experiments upon non-humans in terms ...