Merciful Killing “Euthanasia”
.George Shell suffered from permanent brain damage at the age of twenty-six, due to a lack of oxygen. This unfortunate and serious mishap was caused by Shell’s own selfish personal decisions (Door).
An accident caused by her bulimia, which left her in a vegetarian state from 1990 to 2005. Doctors gave no optimism in her case, as a feeding tube was the only hope to keep her merely existence. According to her husband Michael, she had previously expressed that she did not wish to be kept alive if she was in such condition (Terri).
A wise choice by Terri, due to the circumstances, if kept alive it would only be selfish, costly, and emotionally draining. Michael fought her parents in court for the removal of the feeding tube and it took fifteen years for the courts to favor Michael’s wishes. Terri died on March 18, 2005, thirteen days after her tube was removed (Terri).
Results after her autopsy showed that Terri was unable to think, feel, see, or connect in any sort of way with her surroundings (Dorr).
Michael’s tough decision to end his wife’s life was proven to be the best one.
Some might describe this as cruel and an egocentric form of murder. However, the correct term is euthanasia. Euthanasia can be defined as an act “to deprive a person of existence by execution or omission for his or her alleged benefit” (Keelan).
The word euthanasia comes from a Greek word in the seventeenth century, eu thanatos (Eu meaning good, and thanatos means death, good death (Dunsmuir).
The Research paper on Euthanasia 32
Euthanasia should be legal in the United States. Euthanasia is the practice of painlessly putting to death people who have incurable, painful, or distressing diseases or handicaps. Although most religious groups believe that it is suicide or murder and immoral, people should still have the right to tell the nurse or whomever to pull the plug. People who have supported euthanasia in the past ...
Euthanasia can be classified in four different categories, passive, active, voluntary, and involuntary (Walker).
passive euthanasia is when medical treatment is a necessary means for human existence, and is removed. The consequences are notably known and expected (Walker).
A great example was Terri Shell’s case. Her doctors, husband, and immediate family knew if the feeding tube were to be removed, she would die. That poor woman was kept alive for thirteen years, yet she was unable to connect with the world. active euthanasia is when drugs are administrated to a terminally ill person in order to cause death (Walker).
The difference between the two is in passive euthanasia you do nothing to save a life, whereas in active euthanasia you attempt to end a life. Ethically, no one has the right to say whose lives are more valuable than others, yet we should have the right to end painful agony brought upon a human being due to a disease or illness. Voluntary euthanasia is when a patient expresses a desire to end their life, due to their particular situation (Walker).
This can also include a do-not-resuscitate form. A DNR is a legal form that is somewhat of a will, requesting no medical means be administrated if additional complications arise (Robert).
Involuntary euthanasia is when the person possibly being terminated has no form of communicating, in which doctors or family members make the hard decision to pull the plug (Walker).
Terri Shell once again falls in to this category. Euthanasia is not murder, cruel, or even unnatural. It is a substantial way to relief someone’s pain and agony. Euthanasia just helps a life takes final journey faster and with less distress. All life, regardless of society or moral beliefs, deserves a chance to leave earth in peace.
Euthanasia should be legal because it relieves extreme and unnecessary pain when a person’s life hardly has a purpose or value. Medical expenses can be outrageously high for family members taking care of an ill and terminal loved one, and euthanasia may be the best choice. In addition, a terminally and incompetent human kept alive for someone else’s selfish emotional demand, may interfere with the medical care of other, possibly healthy patients. We should also have the right to end our own lives or the ones of our loved ones, in extreme, painful, and hopeless circumstances. We determine the value of our lives, and should also regulate how much physical pain and suffering we allow ourselves to go through.
The Essay on Making Life Choices
Making choices could affect you life’s future a lot! Life is all about good or bad choices and you are the one who makes the decisions or choices.There are a lot of choices to make in life.You might make the wrong choices.You never know! Some people just like to make the good choices and getting rewards while others are making the bad choices and getting rewards or consequences.You always ...
The determination and emotional distress it takes to euthanize a loved one or a patient, is a great one. However, is it inhuman to allow a patient to go through agonizing pain, or to ease their pain by euthanization? It is utterly heartless, brutal, and absolutely shameless to allow or watch human beings go through a deadly disease and hopelessly keep them alive (Maisie).
If a person is able to communicate their wishes, then I believe the person should be heard, and their wishes should be met, regardless of what they are asking for. Throughout life people have choices to make. Some choices may be to better ourselves, to change our destiny, or maybe to look for something new, some may be hard choices and some may be crystal clear. The case is we make choices every day, and if ending a life for the benefit of an individual, then the choice should be theirs, loved ones, or medical experts. Every case is and will be unique, and should be treated adequately, but in the end the intentions of euthanization are good ones. I understand that there may be religious factors or moral issues when active euthanasia takes place. However, passive euthanasia allows life’s course to take its place. Death should not be prolonged, for it is vein, and if doctors and families are able to facilitate a less more efficient way of passing, then it should be done (Maisie).
Americans are well aware of medical facilities and their treatments, and with them come great expenses. If a family member became terminally ill or was suddenly put in a vegetarian state, and there was no hope of survival, financially, euthanasia would be a beneficial choice for both parties. A great concern is that insurance companies will take advantage of euthanasia in order to cut their costs and increase their profits (Arguments).
The Essay on So What Makes A Person Attractive?
Beauty defines our culture. It often determines who gets a particular job, who makes the most money, or even who gets the signing contract. American’s typically utilize attractiveness as a tool more than a feature. It has become so prevalent in today’s society that vast markets exist only to supply beauty products. With so much of our civilization thriving on attractiveness, a simple ...
It is better to let go of a loved one then prolong their death. In addition, terminally ill patients, vegetarian patients, and patients that have no desire to live, may take up room, time, facilities, medicine, and resources that could be used for healthier patients and research. Basically, they utilize resources that really don’t do them any good, or bring them back to normal. We all have the right to choose for ourselves and to make wise, intelligent, beneficial choices for others.
Freedom is one of the greatest values Americans have. Despite the fact that euthanasia is not a choice we are able to make for ourselves or others in the states. Oregon is the only state in America that allows euthanasia, however it comes with many restrictions (Legal).
The government shouldn’t be allowed to decide whether a person in agonizing pain should be kept alive or not. If a person is denied the resources to end their pain by euthanasia, they may resort to a painful and monstrous form of suicide. When a person is terminally ill, and has accepted their fatal coming, they should be allowed to leave this earth as they please. Who are we to judge their final decisions? We are no one to place that judgment on others, for the simple fact that we have absolutely no idea how physically and mentally agonizing a disease can actually be.
In 1994, the citizens of Main voted for euthanasia to be legal with certain restrictions (Main’s).
The restrictions are as follows “a person must be terminally ill, have six months or less to live, must make two verbal request for assistance in dying, a single written request to die, must convince two different doctors that they are genuine with the request and it is voluntary, depression may not be a factor, must be educated on other alternatives, and once all of the above has been met, the individual must wait a total of fifteen days before the plan is taken in to action” second chances for the terminally ill to make a final decision.
