Daru, the schoolteacher in a remote area of Algeria, is torn between duty and what he believes is the right thing to do when he is suddenly forced in the middle of a situation he does not expect. He must escort an Arabic prisoner to the nearest town. It is not that Daru has much sympathy for the man; in fact, he does not, and actually finds himself disliking the Arab for disrupting so many lives. ‘Daru felt a sudden wrath against the man, against all men with their rotten spite, their tireless hates, their blood lust.’ Unfortunately, Daru loves his homeland, and cannot bear to think of leaving, despite the chaos that is raging around him between France and the Algerian natives. I believe that Daru makes the right choice in letting the prisoner choose his own fate. Daru has reasons to believe that his safety might be jeopardise d, since there is a war going on and he doesn’t really know the Arab to well.
Also, Daru could be avoiding his responsibility to take the Arab to Ting uit, perhaps out of personal weakness, perhaps because he doesn’t want the fate of another man to rest, even partially, on his shoulders. This represents Daru as an existentialist. He sees that his decisions are affected by what society expects. In this case its to escort the Arab to a prison in a near by town. Society expects Daru to see the Arab as a criminal and take him to jail to fulfil his sentence for his crime.
As an existentialist, Daru believes that the Arab should be able to make his own choice. Daru’s feelings seem to change. He is intrigued by the individual and shows compassion while offering the Arab food and drink. Daru’s choice begins to clear up for the reader as he begins to realize he is as much a prisoner and guest as the Arab. Daru does not want this decision to be solely on him because he himself feels like ‘the guest’ to the nation and culture. As Daru takes the prisoner out onto the plateau and gives the decision back to the Arab, he realizes the consequences that may arise of his own choice and comes to terms with the fact that he isn’t going to make any decision in the fate of the prisoner.
The Essay on Albert Camus Daru Arab Prisoner
Discriminating Anarchy A Criticism in Plot of Albert Camus' "The Guest" Who is responsible for whom Is a prisoner the responsibility of an uninvolved individual Can individuals with diverse backgrounds hold the same ideals of the same crimes to identical extents Within the pages of The Guest, Albert Camus presents to the literary world a challenge. The question put to mankind is, again, as it was ...
If Daru had foreseen the note on his blackboard, then I believe he would have let the Arab go free. Considering the note on the blackboard has some threat to it and that Daru basically lets the Arab go free at the top of the hill anyways, Daru would give the Arab to whomever wrote the note. It is clear that Daru doesn’t want to have anything to do with this Arab. He wants the Arab to flee so he doesn’t have to deal with him. “He was amazed at the unmixed joy he derived from the mere thought that the Arab might have fled and that he would be alone with no decision to make.”.
