James C. Davies (1962), a scholar studying the root causes of revolution, developed the J-Curve theory. The latter is the illustration of his hypothesis that “revolutions are likely to occur when a prolonged period of objective economic and social development is followed by a short period of sharp reversal” (Mason, 2004).
Simply put, a prolonged period of social and economic development increases people’s expectations of material wellbeing. When a crisis such as a war brings about a sharp reversal in the level of achievement, popular expectations do not adjust to the latter. The gap between expectations and achievement may widen to the point that frustration, and, later, aggression will ensue.
When frustration is shared by the members of a given society, aggression will manifest itself through collective violence (Mason, 2004).
Aggression, however, crystallizes into revolution (Mason, 2004) when frustration is directed towards the government. Shared frustration over the government’s inability to reverse declining levels of satisfaction brings about a politicized form of aggression. This politicized form of aggression is no other than revolution.
But one limitation of the J-Curve theory is that it operates on the idealistic premise that the government has the capacity to keep up with the rising expectations of its citizens (Glantz, 2006).
In reality, no government can ever do that. Furthermore, a decline in the achievements of the government would also prompt the people to expect less from it.
The Term Paper on Provisional Government Lenin Revolution 1917
1917 Bolshivik Revolution – Lenin's Leadership Essay, 1917 Bolshivik Revolution – Lenin's Leadership How Important Was Lenin To The Successful Bolshevik Seizure Of Power In October 1917? 1 July 1998 Men make their own history they do not make it under circumstances chosen by them, but rather under circumstances directly encountered, given and transmitted from the past. In any account ...
An example which shows the limitation of the J-Curve theory is the War on Terror. Following 9/11, the American public was constantly bombarded with developments such as the Homeland Security Act and the deployment of troops to Afghanistan and Iraq. In the process, they expected the Bush regime to win its battle with Saddam Hussein and the Al-Qaeda. But the American government later started to receive alerts about possible terrorist attacks on shopping malls, airports, hospitals, etc. As a result, the people finally accepted that while the US is winning the War on Terror, its victory is not as fast as they expected.
References
Glantz, M.H. Fragilecologies. (2006, June 1).
Why Americans Don’t Riot: The Davies J- Curve Yet Again. Retrieved March 25, 2009, from http://www.fragilecologies.com/jun01_06.html
Mason, T.D. (2004).
Caught in the Crossfire: Revolutions, Repression and the Rational Peasant. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.