Jeffersonian Democracy v. Jacksonian Democracy The lives led by Thomas Jefferson and Andrew Jackson were stark in contrast, yet their political philosophies were similar. However, Jacksonian Democracy picked up where Jeffersonian Democracy left off, further enabling rights to the common man as well as new social groups. While Jefferson felt pity for the lower classes, Jackson had more selfish reasons, he saw this group as the big “swing vote,” and idea that would change the polling place forever. Thomas Jefferson was elected President of the United States of America in 1800 and immediately deemed it the “Revolution of 1800.” However, Jeffersonian leadership did bring about a political revolution, one that centered on more responsibility from the lower class. Since the inception of the Constitution, the common folk were not deemed worthy or responsible enough to handle the vote, thus the Electoral College was created. Now, with Jefferson the President, he began to steal saturated rights from the rich and gave them to the poorer classes. A responsibility was given to the masses now, one that said they now had the power of the vote, and in the selection of the next leader of the Free World. Characteristics of Jefferson’s new political thought include reduction of federal officeholders, concentration in agricultural areas and backcountry, no special favors for manufacturers and the preferential treatment towards agrarian communities (Bailey, Kennedy, and Cohen, 206).
Jefferson was known as regarding agriculture the “pillar of our prosperity” (Ellis, 45).
The Term Paper on Liberal Democracy World Western Political
Chomsky is one of the most astute and notorious outspoken critic of liberal democracy that is promoted by the guardians of the world order or simply the western world. He especially direct his criticisms towards the United States and the United Kingdom who seek to establish democracy all over the world in order to have some sort of control over the people either for political or material reasons. ...
