The Trial at Nuremberg
During World War II the Allies were determined that both Hitler and the men around him
should be punished for starting World War II and the crimes they had committed while
they were waging it. These crimes included the extermination of the Jewish people of
Europe known as the Holocaust or the Shoah. After some debate it was decided that the
fairest way to proceed was the public trial of the men and organizations who committed
the crimes.
At the most famous of these, the Nuremberg Trial, , and that had been organized to carry
out the Nazi programs, were placed on trial for their crimes. Martin Bormann was tried in
absentia. Additionally Robert Ley was charged as a defendant but committed suicide
before the trial, and Gustav Krupp, who was named in the indictments, was found to be
medically unfit to stand trial. Many of the leading Nazis, such as Hitler, Himmler, and
Goebbels, were not present at the Nuremberg Trial because they has committed suicide at
the end of the war.
The first step was to agree upon the rules for the trial. They adopted a of the four Allies
(the United States, Great Britain, France and the Soviet Union).
The defendants were
given the right to be represented by counsel, call witnesses, and present evidence in their
The Essay on The Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal
... around the concept of aggressive war, its planning and execution, respectively. The Nuremberg War Charter details this as ... the indictment alleges War Crimes, which are defined by the International Military Tribunal for the trial of war criminals as: ... Nuremberg defendants, to prove that each of the twenty-one men involved individually had the requisite intent to conspire to commit aggressive war ...
own behalf. They were not given the right to a jury trial which was part of the law only in
Great Britain and the United States. Finally, after all the evidence was presented, the
defendants were permitted to make statements to the court without being sworn or
cross-examined.
The next step was the , a statement of the charges against each defendant. The Allies
charged the defendants with four types of crimes: conspiracy against peace, crimes against
peace, war crimes, and crimes against humanity. The Allies stated that the Nazis, when
they started the war, had deliberately broken the treaties that Germany had signed. The
Holocaust was included as part of the crimes against humanity. Not all of the defendants
were charged under all counts of the indictment. Doenitz, Raeder, and Schacht were not
accused of participating in the Holocaust.
The trial was held before a panel of judges selected by the Allies called the and presided
over by a British judge named Lord Lawrence. The Allies presented their evidence which
consisted almost entirely of the words and documents of the Nazis themselves. During the
investigation that led up to the trial, the U.S. and British investigators had discovered
literally tons of documents which proved the charges against the defendants. The decision
was made, therefore, to rely on the words of the defendants themselves in the trial. Certain
witnesses were presented to flesh out the evidence. This is especially true in the case
against the concentration camps where witnesses ranging from a member of the French
parliament — who had been imprisoned as a slave laborer at Auschwitz — to an American
army officer who had been imprisoned at Buchenwald testified. Several Nazi officers also
testified about how the Holocaust occurred.
Although the French and the Soviets were originally supposed to present the case on the
crimes against humanity, the Americans and British had presented a lot of evidence about
the Holocaust when they presented evidence. In fact, by the time the Soviets started to
present their case one of the judges, Lord Birkett of Great Britain, was restless because he
The Essay on Due Process Models And Crime Control Models
In America, we have the greatest chance in the world for liberties and rights. Given to us by our Constitution, many of our laws have to coincide with the basics of our founding fathers beliefs in a good, lawful nation. Since the ratification of the Constitution, the first ten amendments made their way into modern law in December of 1791 to further procure our rights. These became collectively ...
thought the testimony was unnecessary — the case had been proven over and over again.
The final phase of the trial was the defendants’ cases. The defendants actually took more
time in the court than the prosecutors. Although the defenses varied most either stated
that they not involved in the Holocaust or did not know it was happening. All of the
defendants testified at length and presented witnesses. One of the most important
witnesses about the Holocaust, Rudolf Höß (or “Hoess”), the commandant of Auschwitz,
was actually called as a witness for the defense.
The judges had a hard time deliberating about whether the defendants were guilty and
what punishments should be meted out to those who were guilty. The French judge,
DeVabres, was not convinced that any of the defendants should be found guilty on the
charge of conspiracy because that concept was not found in French or German law.
In the final , three defendants, Von Papen, Schacht, and Fritzche, were acquitted entirely.
Eleven others were acquitted of some of the charges against them and Hess was acquitted
of the charges of participating in the Holocaust and other war crimes. Twelve of the
defendants were sentenced to death. Bormann was never found and Goering committed
suicide. The others were hung on October 16, 1946.
The Nuremberg Trial was the only trial of Nazi war criminals that was conducted by an
international tribunal. Later, other Nazi war criminals were placed on trial, many in the
same court-room where the Nuremberg Trial had occurred. Each of these trials, however,
was conducted by a single country. The Americans, for example, tried the defendants who
had performed cruel medical experiments on prisoners; the British tried the men who had
run Bergen-Belsen concentration camp.
The trials continued for several years until the American, British,
and French turned the work over to German courts. As late as 1965, defendants were still
being tried in Germany for the crimes they committed during the Holocaust.
The Nuremberg trials were more controversial when they happened then they are today. It
was a new idea and new procedures had to be established. Some were uncomfortable with
The Term Paper on Western Front War French Plan
Introduction The Western Front during the course of World War I was a virtual stalemate. There are a number of reasons for this lack of movement including tacticalunderachievements, technological improvements, and the hindrances caused by massive opposing armies in a small, restrictive area. These, however do not include the very important and often overlooked reason: lack of good leadership. ...
the idea of trying men for starting the war when there had never been a trial like this
before. Others have been bothered by the death sentence given to Julius Streicher and the
light sentence given to Albert Speer. Today there are very few legal scholars who accept
the technical arguments about whether the trial should have been held. Even those
reputable scholars who disagree base their objections on their legal philosophy. All agree
that the Tribunal took its job seriously and gave the defendants a fair trial.
