War can destroy a man both in body and mind for the rest of his life. In “The Sniper,” Liam O’Flaherty suggests the horror of war not only by presenting its physical dangers, but also by showing its psychological effects. We are left to wonder which has the longer lasting effect-the visible physical scars or the ones on the inside? In this story the author shows how location plays a big part in how physically dangerous a war is. Gunshots heard throughout the city are a sign of how close the fighting between the “Republicans and Free States…
.” is to innocent citizens (this is most often the case in civil war).
The sniper’s positioning “on a rooftop near O’Connell Bridge” is very dangerous, for he can see everyone who enters the town, but they cannot see him. .”.. Machine guns and rifles… .” are the weapons of choice in this story; very dangerous, for they are very strong guns that are “true” war weapons. As evidenced above, location plays a big part in how dangerous a war is.
Bullets, of course, are another big danger in war. The author shows with bullets how close you are to death in a war. In the event where the sniper lights his cigarette, he is twice almost killed with the “enemy” sniper’s bullets! The sniper’s own bullets are quite dangerous, too, as seen when he easily kills the tank commander and citizen woman informer. After shooting them, the “enemy” sniper sees him, and “His forearm [is] dead.” This is considered lucky as far as war goes, though, for instead of just having a broken arm he could be dead! The sniper brushes with death again when he throws his revolver down without thinking and it goes off. Bullets make a war very deadly, as they are much more precise than earlier and much simpler weapons (such as swords and muskets).
The Term Paper on War On Iraq Nuclear Weapons
FROM ROB: Ok here is my opinion on this issue that has been thrown out there by a few people. Like has been said it is only that, an opinion, but backed with FACT. So don't write me back flipping out on me and sending hate mail... : -D Fake surrenders, forcing CHILDREN to take up arms or kill them, Mutilate POW by cutting out their tongues and torturing them to there death, supplying your troops ...
The psychological effects of war bring on a very different aspect of horror. The sniper becomes quite fanatical about his job in the war. He gets very excited over the thrill of the kill, turning his job into a game. “His hand trembled with eagerness” as he was trying to shoot the “enemy” sniper, showing the intense excitement he felt. He has such a lust for battle that he even stops eating! The sniper also begins to see all others as “the enemy”- the woman in the shawl, an innocent citizen, is seen as an enemy to him because she tipped off the tank commander (which she probably did for her own safety).
War has psychologically changed the sniper to refer to all others not on his “side” as the enemy.
The sniper develops insensitivity to death during the war. When he kills the old woman, she’s trying to run away and isn’t really a threat. He even “utters a cry of joy” when he finally shoots the enemy sniper. This shows how war can get people caught up in the cat-and-mouse “game” aspect of it and forget what they ” re actually doing-killing people. People get so caught up in the “game” that they don’t think about the repercussions for their actions.
War is dangerous; however it does more than injure you physically. “The Sniper” shows how war’s effects on the mind can be just as if not more harmful than its physical effects. The psychological effects of war can change a man and last a lifetime.
